News 
 National Rural News 
 Cotton 
 General 
 Will US cotton growers continue to pay for crop technology 

Will US cotton growers continue to pay for crop technology

09 Jan, 2010 04:00 AM
Nearly three-quarters of the cotton consultants and extension personnel at the 2010 Beltwide Cotton Conferences expect United States' acreages to increase by at least 10 per cent.

Nearly a quarter of them expect acreage to increase by at least 20pc.

That said, more than one-third of the 200 or so attendees believe technology fees are the greatest input cost and most believe they need to be lower.

However, none of the speakers want to go back to the days before Bt and Roundup Ready cotton.

Roger Carter, of Agricultural Management Services Inc., Clayton, Louisiana, is one of those who doesn't want to grow cotton without seed traits.

However, Carter wondered: "Have we reached the point where we're paying more than we're getting out of it?"

The audience's answer was a "yes".

In the survey, 26pc say the technology is priced much too high and another 37pc believe it's a little too high.

"When we put so much money into the front end of the crop we don't have much to work with later on," Carter says.

On the other hand, Louisiana State University AgCenter entomologist Rogers Leonard sees seed traits as valuable risk management.

With Bt cotton and, especially, varieties with stacked traits, Leonard says growers know what their putting into a crop and have a good idea of what they'll get out of it.

With unpredictable pest pressure and weather conditions, those who grow conventional cotton don't have that security, he said.

"It becomes quite a more variable system," Leonard said. "It increases risk."

The difference in the attitudes regarding tech traits in cotton largely lie in whether the discussion is about insects or weeds.

Insect resistance prior to the introduction of Bt cotton bolstered it's value.

Weed resistance issues in recent years make that technology less valuable.

"In my state, Flex cotton doesn't bring anything to us in terms of weed control," University of Georgia Extension weed scientist Stanley Culpepper said.

"We can't wait to spray until fifth or sixth leaf. We need to spray at two or three."

Ultimately, Arkansas consultant Bob Griffin said: "When the producer doesn't think it's worth it anymore, he'll go back to growing conventional cotton. I don't want to go back."

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
If Monsanto et al get their way over here with GM crops (it will be an uphill battle for them!) then we can expect the same situation of escalating seed and input costs, and lower returns for already struggling farmers. GM cotton is only one example of the stranglehold Monsanto has over agriculture. They do not care for the farmer, or the public - only maximising their dirty profits at any cost.
Posted by brett sanders, 9/01/2010 8:09:05 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
08 January, 2010
POLL
Q: Do you believe your farm business will turn a profit in 2010?

Definitely
(10.4%)

Probably
(16.2%)

Maybe
(17.8%)

Break even
(15.2%)

Probably make a loss
(40.4%)

Total Votes: 512
Poll Date: 04 January, 2010

Most popular articles

SPRAY AWARDS NEWS MREC



The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...