News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 Political 
 Why should we suffer over carbon emissions, asks India 

Why should we suffer over carbon emissions, asks India

08 Jun, 2009 10:55 AM
INDIA says it will not accept anything less than the right to lift its greenhouse gas emissions per head to Australian levels.

Addressing a minerals conference in Canberra last week, India's high commissioner, Sujatha Singh, spoke bluntly.

"You cannot have an agreement whereby countries that reach a certain standard of living, a certain level of development, turn around and tell the rest of the world that, 'That we have we get to keep; that what we have, you can't even aspire to'. That would be what a restriction on India's emissions would amount to," she said.

"We are telling you that we need to grow if we are going to give our 600 million people who live on under $2 US a day a decent standard of living. Our per capita emissions will increase, there's no doubt about it.

"But I am assuring you that they will never increase to what you yourselves are emitting.

"So you have an incentive to bring it down. Bring it down, we'll match it, we won't exceed it."

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
This is exactly why an ETS is flawed beyond redemption. Our government must rethink the issue from the ground up.
Posted by John Michelmore, 8/06/2009 9:21:59 AM
We are wasting our time! 20 million versus over 1 billion. So we reduce to "x" level based on 20 million head of population, India increases to "x" based on 1 billion head of population. We suffer, they enjoy!
Posted by Gecko, 9/06/2009 5:32:19 AM
India is clearly a major part of the emissions problem and their criticism of Australia's emissions allowance under Kyoto is facile. The root cause of global environmental damage is exponential population increase. India needs to get it's breeding problem under control before it starts making wild pronouncements about bringing the standard of living of their plague of humanity up to western levels.
Posted by Brucemc, 9/06/2009 8:25:56 AM
Which is a timely notice that people who live in glass houses should not throw stones. Furthermore, if emissions are to be calculated on a per capita basis, to date I have seen no attempt to calculate how much of Australia's emission is undertaken on behalf of other countries. If there is a liability for emissions from the production of export goods then the liability is exported with the goods.
Posted by Ted O'Brien, 9/06/2009 8:42:38 AM
Do Rudd and Wong need any more indications that the so called developing world is just laughing at our ETS or Fresh Air Tax. China will ignore it, Mexico (which has the most polluted city in the world) will ignore it. Most African countries won't know it exists and India is already telling us to get stuffed. Wong is hell bent on destroying the source of Australia's wealth and it's time the rest of the government started to realise this. Australia depends on what grows on the land and is mined from beneath it, always as and always will, if common sense prevails.
Posted by Woolman, 9/06/2009 10:18:58 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
02 June, 2009
03 June, 2009
POLL
Q: Should the Senate reject the federal Government's proposed Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) legislation?

Yes, reject it: the Senate should vote against the legislation passed last week by the House of Representatives.
(62.7%)

No, vote for it: the legislation should be passed by the Senate.
(11.6%)

Postpone it: Senate should wait till after Copenhagen Summit.
(25.7%)

Total Votes: 723
Poll Date: 08 June, 2009

Most popular articles

Advertisement



The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...