News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 Political 
 Turnbull to get green light on climate changes 

Turnbull to get green light on climate changes

15 Oct, 2009 05:45 AM
Malcolm Turnbull is set to win party room support on Sunday for negotiations with the Government on the emissions scheme, but it will be only the start of the toughest month of his difficult leadership.

Opposition sources say getting the go-ahead for the amendments that spokesman Ian Macfarlane will put to the party room is now not a big issue.

The Nationals have agreed to support the negotiations. Their Senate leader, Barnaby Joyce, when asked if he was happy for Mr Turnbull to negotiate with the Government, said yesterday: "Well, he has to try and turn the volume of this ridiculous scheme down."

Liberal sources say the crunch point for Mr Turnbull has moved beyond Sunday's meeting to the outcome of the negotiations and how the Opposition should react to that.

If the Government accepts some changes while rejecting others, the Opposition will have to make an on-balance judgement on the legislation.

Mr Turnbull at the weekend appeared to be laying the ground for the negotiations to fail and the Opposition to vote down the legislation. But some sources said he seemed to think a deal might be reached.

Senator Joyce reaffirmed that "at the end, I cannot see how any of these amendments are going to get passed and I would put the house on it that we will be voting against" the scheme.

The Nationals have made it clear for months they are headed to voting against the legislation.

The scheme was "a disaster for our nation, so at the end of the day we have to vote against this tax", Senator Joyce said.

Climate Change Minister Penny Wong, in Beijing, hit back, saying Senator Joyce's approach was not in the spirit of "good-faith negotiations".

"I'm sure that that would be very clear to many Australians," she said. "He suggested that the tactic from the National Party, from his perspective, is that you put up amendments, but even if they are agreed to, you won't pass the bill."

Senator Wong also raised the bar for the Opposition's amendments, saying it was critical they were fiscally responsible.

"These negotiations don't occur in the abstract," she said. There was a cost associated with making more significant concessions to industry sectors.

"They are going to have to be more responsible than just simply putting forward the latest wish-list from some aspects of industry," she said. "If you exempt more industries from contributing to climate change, that increases the cost of the scheme to the economy."

The amendments would give more protection to energy-intensive, trade-exposed industries, the coal industry, electricity generators and agriculture.

"We are willing to have a good-faith negotiation, but if Mr Turnbull says he is going to be economically responsible, then the party room amendments should be similarly economically responsible," Senator Wong said.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
One must always have dialogue with the governing party and Turnbull should offer up alternatives based on their policies. It is a natural process then to negotiate and make compromises to lessen any impact but let us not be fooled - it is the governing political party with the numbers that will decide what the baseline will be in the lower house and those in opposition do not usually get their proposals through.

So the focus should reside with what the ALP is putting forward and not what may be (put forward) by the opposition.

We should then concentrate on what the Senate committee's recommendations are and what it rejects and why. Then comes the compromising and negotiations, not threats of double dissolutions. That's how our democracy should work, but we have a Labor Government not interested in compromise - only a bullheaded approach of their way or no way.

Posted by Alan Mears, 15/10/2009 7:28:39 AM
It's amazing! The Liberals have finally made a decision on something!!
Posted by tigerdicky, 15/10/2009 7:31:16 AM
And at the same time he's lost the faith of the populace. Who wants to vote for a leader who can't stand up to bully Rudd, meaning the rest of us will cop the biggest tax in the history of the world.
Posted by Paul, 15/10/2009 7:35:47 AM
Oh, Paul, you can't stop a train by standing in front of it - you have to push the driver out and take over the controls. The Coalition needs to get elected before it can govern for the populace - the only way it can do that is to tell them that the majority have been misled into believing what they want to hear.
Posted by AJ, 16/10/2009 8:15:37 AM
The population knows that the whole scheme is based on fraudulent science. It is good to see Barnaby Joyce standing up against this complete uneccessary attempt to tax the people for no benefit to climate.
Posted by Len, 16/10/2009 10:24:48 AM
I just can't wait to see how big the sceptic vote is in the by-elections. And someone should ask Wong how anyone can "negotiate in good faith" with people who rely on fraudulent science, negligent risk analysis, and improper exercise of power.

And someone should explain to Turn-bull, and his jellyback-Liberals, that it is usually minor parties with a balance of power that are left to tinker with fundamentally flawed legislation. And they should then explain to him that it is the role of oppositions to provide a practical alternative and then have the bottle to stand by their alternative approach.

It is time to stop letting the voters cop-out of a necessarily hard choice. Put it right back on them and make it clear that they will get exactly what they deserve if they make a poor choice.

Posted by Ian Mott, 16/10/2009 10:35:59 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Opposition Leader Malcolm Turnbull.
Opposition Leader Malcolm Turnbull.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
12 October, 2009
13 October, 2009
14 October, 2009
POLL
Q: For which levy rate will you vote at this year's WoolPoll?

0%
(43%)

1%
(9.9%)

2%
(32.2%)

2.5%
(4.5%)

3%
(10.5%)

Total Votes: 314
Poll Date: 11 October, 2009

Most popular articles

Advertisement



The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...