News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 Political 
 Nats climate fear tactics will hurt farmers, says Burke 

Nats climate fear tactics will hurt farmers, says Burke

12 Nov, 2009 10:35 AM
AGRICULTURE Minister Tony Burke says the Nationals' campaign against emissions trading will have some resonance with farmers.

He accused the party of fear mongering and ignoring the threat to agriculture from climate change, saying the Nationals' staunch opposition to emissions trading would find some support, he told The Australian Financial Review.

"What the Nationals are doing, though, is something that no farmer ever does, and that is saying the option is to not engage in risk management. I don't know any farmer who chooses that option, but that's essentially what the Nationals are advocating."

He said he had met farmers who were sceptical that climate change was caused by humans but still supported action to curb emissions in case they were causing dangerous change that could jeopardise the future of agriculture.

The Nationals Senate leader Barnaby Joyce yesterday repeated his view that emissions trading would be a "massive new tax" that would not change the temperature of the globe.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size


comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
The assumption that the ETS is the great white hope for Australia’s climate change solution is incredibly naive. The thing is the Labor party has made its bed with it and now has to sleep in it!

If the Labor govt. wants to really do something constructive about carbon dioxide output, just go nuclear, there will be no regressive aspects to it as with an ETS

Posted by ken, 12/11/2009 3:44:31 PM
Farmers are very familiar with the climate and climate change. So Tony Burke's fear campaign was never going to get much headway with them.
Posted by Qlander, 12/11/2009 6:21:04 PM
'Tony Burke's fear campaign'... I don't follow. Advocating risk management is a fear campaign?? Qlander, are you suggesting farmers should just carry on as they have for the past decades? And if droughts do continue or increase in length or severity they should simply suck it up? Good luck... As a farmer and businessman I think risk management is just common sense.
Posted by GT, 12/11/2009 10:25:07 PM
GT, so when you insure your house, you pay its full value in premiums every year do you? Risk management is first of all making an accurate assessment of the risk. And then taking an economically sensible action.

I am already moving my management options in line with the changing climate. It would make my life a lot easier if I don't have to factor a massive tax in as well.

Posted by Qlander, 13/11/2009 1:19:43 PM
Kevin is out there stirring the fear campaign well and truly. “With only weeks to go, time is running out, time is running out for us all, time is also running out for the planet,” Mr Rudd said.

Unfortunately, GT, if Kevin gets his way with the TAX, the droughts will still be there and the money Kevin rakes in won't help farmers.

Posted by jerangle, 13/11/2009 2:44:41 PM
Great Scott, GT, try to keep up will you, CO2 is just a minor trace gas and plant food. IT'S NOT HEATING THE PLANET.
Posted by Loc Hey, 13/11/2009 4:02:05 PM
Now we have the new fear campaign that by the turn of the century all seaside dwellings as well as Sydney and Brisbane airports will be flooded. Kevin and Penny will stop this with their TAX.
Posted by jerangle, 14/11/2009 9:27:08 AM
Loc Hey, keep up will you, 1% of the atmosphere is GHG and it keeps the planet warmer than it should be. No matter what is happeneing in the naturual cycle humans are increasing the amount of GHG in the atmosphere. It is not just CO2, it is a range of gases. CO2 does act as a fertiliser for crops but it will increase yield and then decrease protein, according to the CSIRO. CO2 may be a trace gas but it is a bloody important one. Try messing with the amount of phospherous in your body, small amount but bloody impratant. Seriously I am surprised some of you people know how to use a computer.
Posted by the lorax, 16/11/2009 12:14:25 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Tony Burke says he has met farmers who are sceptical that climate change is caused by humans but still support action to curb emissions in case they are causing dangerous change that could jeopardise the future of agriculture.
Tony Burke says he has met farmers who are sceptical that climate change is caused by humans but still support action to curb emissions in case they are causing dangerous change that could jeopardise the future of agriculture.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
12 November, 2009
11 November, 2009
POLL
Q: Has the emissions trading debate changed your voting intentions?

More likely to vote Labor
(10.5%)

More likely to vote Coalition
(47.2%)

Less likely to vote Labor
(12%)

Less likely to vote Coalition
(3.2%)

No change
(21.8%)

Other
(5.4%)

Total Votes: 685
Poll Date: 08 November, 2009

Most popular articles




The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...