News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 Political 
 Humbled Turnbull vows to change 

Humbled Turnbull vows to change

26 Nov, 2009 07:03 AM
MALCOLM TURNBULL'S critics have vowed to keep pursuing him and warned that unless the Coalition's standing in the polls improves early next year, he should expect another leadership challenge.

After days of rancour and division caused by Mr Turnbull's support for an emissions trading scheme, the Opposition Leader survived a leadership challenge by seven votes yesterday, beating Kevin Andrews by 48 to 35.

Mr Turnbull, whose temperament throughout the debate further alienated his detractors and worried his supporters, pledged to improve his manner.

He told the party-room he had been humbled by what had been ''an ugly few days'', acknowledged he could have handled himself better and called for the party to unify.

There was embarrassment for Mr Turnbull last night when a report into the ''Utegate'' affair detailed the high level of collusion between himself, the disgraced Treasury official Godwin Grech, and John Howard's former chief of staff, Arthur Sinodinos, as they attempted to damage the Rudd Government.

Mr Grech and Mr Sinodinos advised Mr Turnbull on how to deal with Labor's emission trading scheme by backing amendments to avoid a double dissolution but then attacking the scheme's deficiencies.

In an email from Mr Grech to Mr Turnbull on June 16, Mr Grech says how he ''spoke with Sinodinos tonight''.

''He very much agrees with my view that we should neutralise the ETS issue ASAP by supporting Rudd's bill but by pointing to those areas that we would fix in Government.

''We can then hold Rudd accountable for job losses etc relating to the deficiencies of Rudd's ETS bill - while reassuring our constituencies that we would fix things if they supported us.''

Mr Turnbull exercised his leadership on Tuesday and directed the Coalition would support Labor's emissions scheme after a party-room meeting lasting almost eight hours. He decreed the majority of all Coalition MPs and senators - both frontbenchers and backbenchers - supported his stance. The rebels said a majority of backbenchers opposed him.

The debate split the party down the middle and Mr Andrews challenged with the threat to withdraw support for the scheme. The ballot reflected the same numbers within the Liberal Party for doing a deal with Labor. Mr Andrews did not rule out running again.

''I believe this sends a very clear message to the Liberal Party that there has been deep concern about the way things have occurred over the last few weeks,'' he said.

Inside the party, there was a consensus Mr Turnbull's leadership had been so badly damaged by the affair his time was limited. One of his key supporters confided that Mr Turnbull needed to turn things around by February or there would be another challenge, this time possibly involving Tony Abbott, Joe Hockey and even Andrew Robb.

Mr Robb shocked and angered Mr Turnbull on Tuesday when he spoke out in the party room against a deal. Sources said last night Mr Robb was again positioning himself as a ''safe pair of hands'' candidate.

The deal with the Government means the Senate must pass the legislation before Parliament rises this year.

The rebels did all they could to show dissent. Three frontbenchers, Brett Mason, Mathias Cormann and Mitch Fifield, all quit and joined up to a dozen colleagues to cross the floor four times in failed bids to delay the legislation until next year.

The Senate leader, Nick Minchin, and his deputy, Eric Abetz, who oppose Mr Turnbull, failed to show for any of the votes.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Yeah and the big losers were the Australian people. At www.twawki.wordpress.com Joanne Nova said: "Australia is in the extraordinary position of passing legislation that is known to be based on fraudulent science." And Terry Mc Crann said: "We had a prime minister who declared economic war on his own country. And an opposition leader who spent the rest of the day trying desperately to make it unanimous."
Posted by twawki, 26/11/2009 8:44:54 AM
I had a look at the TWAKI site and it has nothing fantastic or groundbreaking on it. All I see form both sides is claim and counter claim with no substantiation of fact or merit of science. Every argument has a counter argument. eg scpetics argument - It has been cooling since 2000. AGW argument - 12 of the 14 hottest years on record have been in the last 14. I could go on for hours.
Posted by the lorax, 30/11/2009 3:09:23 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Opposition Leader Malcolm Turnbull.
Opposition Leader Malcolm Turnbull.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
25 November, 2009
24 November, 2009
25 November, 2009
POLL
Q: How has the deregulation of export wheat marketing affected your farm's profits this harvest?

Increased profits
(22.1%)

Decreased profits
(56.2%)

No change
(21.7%)

Total Votes: 258
Poll Date: 23 November, 2009
BLOGS
11 November, 2009
19 November, 2009
SPECIAL FEATURES

Most popular articles

ELDERS NEWS MREC FW



The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...