News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 Political 
 Hockey in hot seat; vote on Tuesday 

Hockey in hot seat; vote on Tuesday

28 Nov, 2009 07:56 AM
LIBERAL PARTY powerbrokers are trying to dump Malcolm Turnbull for Joe Hockey in a bid to unify the party and block the emissions trading scheme - a move that will give the Rudd Government a trigger for a double dissolution election.

With the party imploding, Mr Turnbull told colleagues they would have to blast him out after they signalled yesterday he should stand aside voluntarily and be replaced by Mr Hockey.

A defiant Mr Turnbull told the Herald late yesterday that no one had asked him to quit and he had no intention of doing so. ''I will not step down,'' he said.

He rejected rebel demands that he hold a partyroom meeting at 9am on Monday and instead scheduled it for Tuesday at 9am, the usual time. It would be the second leadership spill against him in a week. The extra day will pressure the Senate to pass the emissions legislation on Monday, a deadline the Government set yesterday as it began positioning for an early election.

The rebels also overlooked the fact that some MPs, including Mr Hockey, would not be in Canberra on Monday.

Powerbrokers were confident Mr Turnbull was finished. They said his support base was dwindling and he would be rolled on Tuesday if he did not quit.

Mr Hockey, who is being pushed as a unity candidate, does not want to challenge and would take the job only if Mr Turnbull stood down and if Mr Hockey's wife, Melissa, agreed. The couple have three children aged under five.

Mr Hockey would run with Peter Dutton as his deputy and Mr Abbott would become shadow treasurer.

With Mr Turnbull digging in, pressure will be put on Mr Hockey over the weekend to challenge. If he resists, and Tony Abbott challenges, sources said Mr Abbott would win. Mr Turnbull was disputing this and telling people he had the numbers. Mr Turnbull has been told he can save himself if he bows to the rebels and agrees to delay the legislation until February.

One of his supporters, Scott Morrison, visited him yesterday. Mr Morrison would not say what transpired but others say he told Mr Turnbull to accept the offer of a delay and save his leadership. Mr Turnbull refused.

Mr Abbott opposes the ETS but Mr Hockey has supported it.

But under the plot being hatched by the powerbroker Nick Minchin, Mr Hockey would have to agree to delay the bill until February if he became leader.

Mr Hockey began walking away from the emissions trading scheme and Mr Turnbull yesterday and signalled he was open to change by posting the following message on Twitter:

''Hey team re The ETS. Give me your views please on the policy and political debate. I really want your feedback.''

Government sources said if the scheme was delayed it would never be passed and the Government would have an excuse for an early election. ''This is starting to look like a mess. We might have to step in and take control,'' a senior figure said.

The scheme was defeated in August and a second defeat would provide a trigger.

The acting Prime Minister, Julia Gillard, would not be drawn on an early election but warned that the Liberals had made a deal with the Government to pass the emissions legislation.

The Liberals welshed on an agreement to have the Senate complete the amendments by 3.45pm yesterday and Ms Gillard gave them until Monday.

''The issue for Monday is we will be here, ready to act in the nation's interest. We expect the Liberal Party to honour its agreement and to be here ready to do the same. If they fail to do so it will be clear they have been conquered by the sceptics and deniers in their ranks.''

Mr Turnbull said the Coalition would be ''wiped out''' in a double dissolution.

He said that since Thursday night, when 10 frontbenchers quit, his office had received 850 emails, of which 750 supported his position on the legislation. Someone malicious had also leaked his mobile phone number and he was receiving hate calls.

Mr Abbott said the only way to change the party's ETS policy was for either the party to change leader or for Mr Turnbull to ''come to his senses''.

''The last thing we want in the party room at the moment is to have another leader's blood on our hands, so to speak, but the most important thing of all is to get this policy changed.''

Senator Minchin said: ''The matter's in Malcolm Turnbull's hands.''

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Bring it on !!!! ETS =TAX
Posted by Dx, 28/11/2009 9:42:08 PM
I have to say that the Liberal party is displaying a level of courage and integrity on this that I no longer thought possible of politicians. They have absolutely nothing to gain by bringing on an election it will be almost impossible for them to win. Yet they are saying to the Australian people "An ETS is a major realignment of Australia's economy that will affect us for decades if not generations. We want you to have a good look at this and then decide for yourselves if you wish to vote for it." Essentially they are placing their trust completely in the hands of the people. Turnbull and Rudd on the other hand are saying, "We know what's best, and you are going to get this whether you like it or not." The last election was not fought on an ETS. An ETS was simply a part of the background noise.
Posted by Qlander, 30/11/2009 10:00:38 AM
I wonder how much support the Liberals will have after an election and they do not have the same numbers in the Senate and the ETS does NOT have an exemption for farmers because they did not honour the current deal!! Even worse if the Greens have enough numbers to pass the bill without support from the independents and they will want higher emissions reductions.
Posted by Farmer Dave, 30/11/2009 10:33:14 AM
Farmer Dave should give sceptics and deniers, who seem totally incapable of thinking through any issue that has any moving parts, something on which to cogitate. It is not a question of an ETS or not an ETS. The only decision to be made is what sort of program we will adopt to reduce emissions. The Australian people have said and clearly continue to say that nothing less than an effective control process will be acceptable. The way this debate, if it can be laughingly called a debate, is going, the Government should be perfectly happy to pull on a double dissolution, which can only result in it achieving a larger majority and a clear mandate. Why wouldn’t they legislate for inclusion of agriculture, which would be poetic justice for those whose political vision is zero?
Posted by Bushie Bill, 30/11/2009 5:51:15 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
The man most likely ... Joe Hockey
The man most likely ... Joe Hockey
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
27 November, 2009
POLL
Q: How has the deregulation of export wheat marketing affected your farm's profits this harvest?

Increased profits
(22.1%)

Decreased profits
(56.2%)

No change
(21.7%)

Total Votes: 258
Poll Date: 23 November, 2009
SPECIAL FEATURES

Most popular articles

ELDERS NEWS MREC FW



The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...