News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 Political 
 Greens join call for population policy 

Greens join call for population policy

15 Mar, 2010 12:03 PM
The Greens will take the first step towards Australia developing a national population policy, a call first made last month by Brisbane's Lord Mayor Campbell Newman.

Greens leader Bob Brown will today call for a senate inquiry into Australia's population.

Mr Brown said Prime Minister Kevin Rudd's vision of a "big Australia" with a population of 35 million by 2050 isn't sustainable.

"We live in a fantastic continent, privileged above all on the face of this planet," Senator Brown told reporters in Canberra on Sunday.

"It's going to take some very wise decision-making to keep it that way," he said.

"I'm saying definitively we do not have the infrastructure or plans for the infrastructure to carry 35 million people by 2050."

The Greens want an inquiry to investigate Australia's "carrying capacity" in terms of population impacts on infrastructure, the environment, health and education. It would report back by mid-2011.

Brisbane's Lord Mayor Campbell Newman raised the need for a national population policy on February 23 and repeated the call in front of Infrastructure Minister Anthony Albanese last week.

He also questioned whether the case had been made for a population of 35 million in Australia.

"Australia must have a national population policy to guide the debate about managing growth in its cities," Brisbane Lord Mayor Campbell Newman said.

He said the policy would set the framework for guiding investment decisions.

"I think all the [South-East Queensland] mayors have said very clearly - and we will be saying at Premier Bligh's growth summit - that there does need to be a national population policy," Cr Newman said.

The Lord Mayor said the federal government needed to make its case for an Australian population of 35.9 million.

"Let's have the debate, let's see why we need a population like that to support the taxbase to ensure that we can pay for people in their old age and hospitals," he said.

"But the case has not been made yet."

A population summit hosted by Premier Anna Bligh will be held in Brisbane on March 30-31.

Senator Brown said ignorance was preventing a rational debate about population growth.

"But there is a lot of ignorance which drives fear of discussing population because you'll be labelled 'racist'."

The Tasmanian senator did acknowledge, however, that calling for slower population growth would be popular.

"I've seen the polls, they don't want it (35 million by 2050)," he said.

"People are concerned about it. It's a debate I get all across the country."

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Bit late now the horse has bolted!
Posted by tigerdicky, 15/03/2010 8:27:28 AM
Sometimes I wonder if Bob Brown really does think he can hold back the tide.
Posted by Qlander, 15/03/2010 9:10:31 AM
Presumably Senator Green is Senator Brown? It would actually be a good idea if he changed his name from Brown to Green-it would be easier for all. My understanding is that the 35 million figure comes from Rudd (and others) saying a few months ago, that on the current settings and without a deliberate policy intervention, the statistics show our population is likely to reach 35 million. This is different to having a "vision" of 35 million for Australia. In any event, it would be reasonable and sensible for Australians to debate the future population issue, with the essential understanding that, as the world population climbs from 7 billion to 9 billion, it is extremely unlikely that Australia will be able or permitted, in splendid, selfish and ignorant isolation, to ignore the extra two billion or so people in the world. 35 million is less than 0.4% of 9 billion-think about it. If we are to have any meaningful control over the outcome, we will have to approach this issue without the usual irrational, racist and totally unrealistic bleatings that will come from the usual suspects, who have their collective heads buried firmly in the sand, totally unprepared for realistic results.
Posted by Bushie Bill, 15/03/2010 10:31:32 AM
Bushie Bill - you get my vote.
Posted by Pickle, 15/03/2010 12:49:44 PM
To Bushie Bill, not wanting to have Australia massively overpopulated where we are all packed together like battery hens is not racist! Why do people like you always say people are racist on issues like this? You ask any everyday Aussie if they want 35 million people in the future, the majority will say NO!
Posted by Get Real, 16/03/2010 1:37:10 PM
Get Real, the one thing I am not doing is calling everyone racist, and perhaps if you read the post without a pre-conceived view, you may conclude that I am saying, firstly, that there will be some commentary on this topic which is pure racism, fear-inspired and xenophobic, secondly, that to make any real progress, we have to recognise this sort of commentary as unacceptable, and dismiss it totally and with contempt, and thirdly, that Australia may decide whatever it wants, hopefully democratically, but in the end, if the nation isn't realistic, the 99.6% world population not Australian may simply decide to ignore us, come anyway, take and do what they want. We cannot, and will not be permitted to, make decisions which are totally ignorant of the anticipated extra 2 billion people in the world. It is you, Get Real, who should get real. You are living in gaga land if you think we can unilaterally and completely insulate and isolate ourselves from the rest of the world. You only have to think for a nano-second to work this out for yourself. Go back and re-read my post, Get Real (that is, if you actually read it in the first place), and begin a process of intelligent thought.
Posted by Bushie Bill, 16/03/2010 6:04:01 PM
No Bushie Bill, you are living in gaga land if you think Australia wants and can handle 35 million people! You say one thing about something like this and a do-gooder, like you, will call people racist. We should not be encouraging the predicted 2 billion then. The world simply can't handle it; our resources are limited and some running out. Anything to do with someone, in fact probably this article, disagreeing with overpopulation you find racist. But I unlike you don’t want to see Australia be turned into India or China, because if you want to see what Australia will look like in the future if a ‘big Australia’ goes ahead that’s what it will be like!
Posted by Get Real, 17/03/2010 12:58:09 PM
You still haven't given any thought to, or perhaps even read, what I have previously posted, Get Real. There is no way you can determine what I think about a future population of 35m or so, or what sort of impact it would have on Australia. The reason you can’t? Very simple, GR-I have made absolutely no comment on the wisdom or otherwise of a population of this magnitude. If you can show I am wrong in saying this, please provide the quote(s) from my posts. Meanwhile, perhaps you should have a nice cup of tea, a good rest on the veranda bed, followed (when you are a little less emotional), by a read of what I did say rather than what you would like to think I said. A good analytical approach, eh?
Posted by Bushie Bill, 17/03/2010 6:23:28 PM
Move to China if you like masses of people around you, in the meantime I like Austs population just the way it is thanks :)
Posted by Get Real, 20/03/2010 12:38:55 PM
Exactly the brainless cop-out I expected from you, Get Real. It is a terrifying fact that you are allowed to cast a vote, but that is democracy for you! It is a redeeming feature of our system that there are more intelligent people in Australia than stupid people.
Posted by Bushie Bill, 22/03/2010 9:45:15 AM
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
12 March, 2010
11 March, 2010
POLL
Q: Do you support the move to introduce an import risk analysis on beef from BSE-affected countries?

Yes
(74.6%)

No
(22.4%)

Uncommitted
(3.1%)

Total Votes: 389
Poll Date: 15 March, 2010

Most popular articles

SPRAY AWARDS NEWS MREC



The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...