News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 Political 
 ETS: Back me or sack me, says Turnbull 

ETS: Back me or sack me, says Turnbull

02 Oct, 2009 07:12 AM
A THREAT by Malcolm Turnbull to walk away should the backbench defy him over climate change has further entrenched divisions within the Coalition and raised doubts about whether he will be leader beyond Christmas.

Fed up with a group of backbenchers publicly destabilising him over his plan to negotiate with the Government on its emissions trading scheme, Mr Turnbull used three separate interviews yesterday to stress he was not prepared to lead a party that did nothing and said nothing.

"Whether my leadership prevails or not on this issue, time will tell," he said.

"I could not possibly lead a party that was on a do-nothing-on-climate-change platform.

"If the party room were to reject my recommendations to them, that would obviously be a leadership issue. That's perfectly plain - quite clear."

Gambling the leadership is extremely dangerous but Mr Turnbull said he was confident he would prevail.

"I will secure the party room's support," he said.

Climate change has become the internal battleground over Mr Turnbull's leadership and both sides of the argument claim to be in the majority.

One Liberal who believes Mr Turnbull's leadership is now untenable because of the threat told the Herald the leader had put a noose around his neck and stood on a chair.

"All we have to do is kick it over," he said.

An ardent Turnbull supporter said Mr Turnbull had started showing real leadership after realising elements of the party were mired in the past and could not be wooed.

The community was concerned about climate change and the party room rebels were sending the message the Liberal Party did not care.

Mr Turnbull concurred with a swipe at the National Party and rebel Liberals such as Cory Bernardi and Wilson Tuckey.

"Anyone who thinks it is electorally wise to have a do-nothing-on-climate-change policy is not in tune with the mood of the nation or the globe."

Liberals speculating that Mr Turnbull might be gone by Christmas reasoned that Tony Abbott, a conservative, was the only realistic replacement.

The shadow cabinet on Wednesday backed Mr Turnbull's intention to try to amend Labor's emissions trading legislation when reintroduced in November.

If the legislation is blocked, Labor will have a trigger for an early double dissolution. Mr Turnbull argues Labor would win such an election and then pass its scheme unamended using a joint sitting of Parliament. Therefore the Coalition should try to seek a better deal for industry and agriculture.

The rebels are demanding he call Labor's bluff and do nothing until at least next year, after an international conference in Copenhagen, by which time other nations' intentions will be better known.

Mr Turnbull stressed repeatedly yesterday that negotiating next month did not guarantee there would be a deal.

The Coalition's final position would depend on which amendments the Government accepted. "We may well vote against it," he said.

Most Liberals are worried about what to do when this moment arrives as it is likely the party room will still be divided.

"For Malcolm, that's the big call," said one frontbencher.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
I would have thought sacking him would be the logical choice. While we are at, it let's do the same to Rudd. I'm sick of governments issuing climate porn and then ignoring that the world is cooling.
Posted by Paul, 2/10/2009 7:38:15 AM
Time to get rid of him! Anyone pushing climate change is a fraudster.
Posted by mick, 2/10/2009 8:14:05 AM
This bloke has a good enough run! Cull him now and elect Joyce!
Posted by tigerdicky, 2/10/2009 8:59:36 AM
Malcolm who?
Posted by Ringers From The Top End, 2/10/2009 9:36:12 AM
I could not possibly vote for a party hell bent on propping up this fraud of Climate Change by supporting the ETS or any legislation to do with it.
Posted by Alan Mears, 2/10/2009 10:08:06 AM
This is blackmail. Let him leave. If our politicians don't want to support the ETS scam, so be it.
Posted by Archibald, 2/10/2009 11:42:12 AM
Bye Malcolm. Don't let the door hit your ase on the way out.
Posted by Qlander, 2/10/2009 5:55:03 PM
Time for some proper debate not just a knocker approach. If Turnbull wants to stay he should articulate what his strategy is to the voters not the party room. After all these months all that stands out is the impression that he likes an ETS but with some changes...what changes? After the utegate nonsense... throwing a tantrum about partyroom support on one fuzzy ETS position, doesn't smack of a successful political leader representing the city or regional folk. In contrast Barnaby leaves no doubt about his position on ETS, or who he represents with that view... that is leadership... without needing to shake (or spill) the sauce.
Posted by pepper, 2/10/2009 6:39:03 PM
If Malcolm Turnbull continues to insist on implementing an ETS then he ought to go. He seems to want to continue with his role as the former Minister for the Environment in the previous Howard government and does not realise that insisting on an ETS is a turn off to Liberal voters who do not agree with labor's ETS policy. The science in flawed, it's bad for the economy, and we don't need any more true believers. If he doesn't understand that then he ought to go. Who is he supporting anyway: Liberal voters, Labor, or his own misguided views on the causes of climate change? If he doesn't man up then sack him.
Posted by Logical, 1/11/2009 11:34:43 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Opposition Leader Malcolm Turnbull.
Opposition Leader Malcolm Turnbull.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
01 October, 2009
POLL
Q: Should politicians who retire mid-term be fined to help recover the costs of holding a by-election?

Yes
(73.4%)

No
(22%)

Undecided
(4.7%)

Total Votes: 473
Poll Date: 27 September, 2009

Most popular articles

Advertisement



The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...