News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 Political 
 CSG losing 'social licence' - Flannery 

CSG losing 'social licence' - Flannery

04 Nov, 2011 03:00 AM
THE multi-billion dollar potential of coal seam gas (CSG) has created a modern-day goldrush that is outstripping the pace of regulation, says environmentalist Tim Flannery.

After travelling the length of the Great Divide during a two-month documentary film shoot, Professor Flannery believes some CSG companies are pushing the boundaries of community acceptance to the point that they are endangering their "social licence to operate".

As chief commissioner of the Climate Commission, Professor Flannery sees potential for CSG as a more climate-friendly source of energy than coal - although he says this needs further research.

But CSG can't come at the expense of current landholders, he says.

The only way forward, he thinks, "is better regulation based on good scientific analysis". And once created, such regulation should be rigorously enforced.

The challenge is to get such regulation developed and enshrined at a time when the goldrush pace of change has already overwhelmed the State and Commonwealth legislative process.

Professor Flannery suggests that to accelerate and inform the political process, landholders should form a "community of interest" with environmentalists.

"I don't know that anyone has a quick fix, but I think for that community of interest to have its voice heard is an important first step."

The idea will hit some ideological barriers, he admits.

"I think there is a group terrified of any sort of alliance between environmentalists, like myself, and country people. They will take any opportunity to make sure that doesn't happen."

Professor Flannery hit an unexpected hurdle to his idea of a landholder-environmentalist CSG alliance last week, when The Australian newspaper used a speech he made to the NSW Minerals Council to create a headline, "Tim Flannery backs coal seam gas and mining industry".

"That article headline was beyond belief to me - I've no idea where they got that from," Professor Flannery told Rural Press.

"It bore no relationship whatever to what I said.

"The cascade of emails I've had consequently from really concerned people, some I met in regional Australia and with who I had a really good understanding - it's been incredible."

Professor Flannery posted a clarification of his position on CSG on the Climate Commission website, and employed a lawyer to send a letter to The Australian asking that the article be changed or retracted. Although the article has been altered, the headline remains intact on The Australian's website.

He encountered first-hand the effects on CSG on landholders during a two-month documentary shoot earlier this year with comedian and social commentator John Doyle.

The clash between the CSG industry and landholders is particularly acute on Queensland's Darling Downs, where hundreds of billions of dollars of mining investment are being pumped into energy resource extraction.

"Quite a few farmers had sorry stories to tell of practices that made it practically impossible for them to continue with their business," he said.

On the Downs, he was told of a company that had gained the trust of a respected landholder and operated without fault on his property. The landholder became advocate for the company in the district; but on other farms, "practices changed dramatically".

"We talked to one family who ran a grazing business. Because of the problems they'd had with fences being knocked over and gates left open and trenches in paddocks, they had to virtually destock their property.

"There was nothing in their contracts that gave them any point of redress. You can understand why people are furious in rural Australia."

As CSG joins climate change and structural change among the issues pressuring regional Australians, Professor Flannery argues there has "never been a more important moment for greater understanding" between landholders and the environmental movement, which is grappling with the same issues.

"I appeal to people in rural Australia to open their minds to the possibility that we could work together."

Meanwhile, he will be urging more research into CSG's effects on groundwater and climate.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
"Good scientific analysis" CANNOT be entrusted to either Government of Resource Industries. Mining/CSG being exempt from Water Reform/NWI is evidence of Govts' capture.

East End Mine Action Group's documentation shows that technical assessments by East End Mine/Govt are shaped to fit political decisions

Landholders & their independent experts MUST be properly empowered in assessments & consultations, with local knowledge taken into account

An independent and affordable appeal on the merits would provide necessary accountability.

Posted by Heather, 4/11/2011 7:12:16 AM
Flannery has taken a different appraoch to CSG than he did with land clearing. He seems that he is positioning himself in the middle ground on CSG but lobbied for a total ban on clearing.

What is worse? Cutting down a tree than can be replanted in the future or the soil it stood on to be planted with food growing crops of allow gas to leach into the underground water aquifer. When you can light a bore obviously something seriously is going wrong. A scientific study is not needed. You can see it.

Posted by Brad Bellinger, 4/11/2011 7:40:37 AM
While farmers & the green movement have been at loggerheads for many years here is an opportunity for them to work for the common good.

Please everyone, take Prof. Flannery's words, "I appeal to people in rural Australia to open their minds to the possibility that we could work together", as an oppotunity to change the game.

We do not have the political clout to fight the green movement on NRMs etc. Our only hope is a partnership of mutual understanding.

Posted by Cow Cocky, 4/11/2011 11:51:52 AM
Landholders need the right to say no. The State Govt needs to listen to the concerns of landholders and the community and take action. The Federal Govt needs to step in an take control if the State does not act.

CSG Mining represents a major landuse change - the consequencesare too serious to be ignored. Licences have been granted over vast areas, affecting catchments throughout NSW. We need to continue to apply pressure at all levels to halt this madness. The benefits of selling the gas are not going to power Australian homes - greed is the driver in this new extractive industry.

Posted by Mrs Cackle, 4/11/2011 1:29:11 PM
CSG has never had a social licence. It has only had the innapropriate weight of the Mining Act to force this obscene industry upon regional communities.

The sooner this process is banished to those areas that do not have aquifers the better.

Even the Chinese have said to the Australian Resources Industry that if they continue to pursue this technology, they will poison the water, land and population.

There is no Energy Security in Australia from CSG, the vast majority of it is being exported overseas to the benefit of overseas multinationals and state government coffers.

Posted by Rob in Margs, 4/11/2011 3:31:54 PM
Social Licence??

How can they lose something they never had!!

Nothing the CSG companies have done has shown they deserve a Social Licence. They believed that the status Quo as per the Mining process was going to be layed out for them.

But as Coal Mining has lost most of it's Social Licence through the abuse of the Rural communities destroyed by the loss of land and water the spiders web of lies that is pushing Gas has not been swallowed by the people who can see that both Coal & CSG tell one sweet tale full of half truths & false facts but their actions tell a story of destruction.

Posted by Liesandmorelies, 4/11/2011 5:23:51 PM
Flannery has already lost his edge as a environmentalist by even suggesting both camps can work together when their are far more sustainable energy resources like solar, wind, geothermal, and wave action. Big money does that to the best of em. I,ve lost my trust in Tim.
Posted by Kev, 6/11/2011 3:07:51 PM
Social licence eh,

Who is issuing them ?On whos authority ?

I see the term at lot now in relation to farming, livestock etc.

Are they issued by the Chardonay quaffing investment bankers and latte sipping public servants. Or is it the busybody bored doctors wives club. Maybe it's good old Kellogs issuing them with each box of corn flakes.

Somehow I think it's just code for Political Correctness and an attempt by all the above to control what they don't own and don't understand.

Keep the miners off YOUR land if thats what you want but don't hide behind 'social licence or deal with the devil

Posted by chops, 6/11/2011 10:42:11 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Professor Tim Flannery.
Professor Tim Flannery.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
20 October, 2011
16 October, 2011
26 October, 2011
01 November, 2011
31 October, 2011
POLL
Q: Do you think the Farmer Review will make a difference to animal welfare?

Yes
(18.4%)

No
(42.3%)

Time will tell...
(39.3%)

Total Votes: 272
Poll Date: 31 October, 2011

Most popular articles

Advertisement



The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...