News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 Political 
 Cowboy Katter rides into Canberrra 

Cowboy Katter rides into Canberrra

25 Aug, 2010 12:50 PM
NORTH Queensland's most powerful cowboy rode into Canberra on Tuesday night where the horse trading begins between a gang of three rural Independents and the two major parties scrambling to form Government after the weekend's election resulted in a hung parliament.

And on top of maverick MP, Bob Katter's negotiating agenda will be the survival of rural Australia – a point he was hammering home during preliminary discussions with the Prime Minister, Julia Gillard, and Opposition leader Tony Abbott, in Canberra yesterday.

Tagged one of Australia's three most powerful men at the moment, Mr Katter said he's not spooked by the negotiations to take place over the weeks ahead.

Listen to Independent Member for Kennedy Bob Katter here

He said all he's after is the right for the areas he represents to survive.

"We're not surviving in rural Australia, we've been declining for 25 years, our industries are all collapsing, our populations are all going, and business can look forward to less and less income every year," Mr Katter said on his arrival to Canberra.

He said it was no secret that ethanol was a big issue for him, and said Australia's trade approach was also hurting rural communities.

"We've been under a paradigm where yes, we can free market, yes we can have no quarantine restrictions, anything can come into Australia," he said.

"The apples were allowed in recently….I mean everything can come into Australia.

"We told them if you bring in prawns, you'll bring in diseases.

"Now the Great Barrier Reef, which I represent, is being venomously attacked…"

Mr Katter said he wouldn't make any presumptive statements one way or the other about who he should or should not support in forming government.

"Tony's mob was in there for 12 years, and at the end of the 12 years there was a farmer committing suicide every four days.

"If they were good for the bush I'm a Martian astronaut.

"Whether the ALP has turned anything back in the last three years then I'm not too sure."

Asked whether he would accept a ministry in a new government Mr Katter said "I'm not in the business of being conned".

Mr Katter said the adversarial nature of Australian politics, which he described as the "Woolworths and Coles model", had been dreadful for Australian politics.

"People on Saturday rejected a Woolworths and Coles political system outright.

"The ranks are growing with those with complete disgust for the mainstream parties.

"Australia's political system as a primitive two-party system which Australia needs to break away from.

"That doesn't mean instability, it means democracy."

Mr Katter said he was not deterred by the perceived power he has in the coming weeks of political negotiations.

"I wielded great power in the State of Queensland…I've wielded power before, I come from a family that has had a lot of power for about five generations in Australia.

"I'm used to power and I feel comfortable with it."

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1


comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
This hero of the Australian people should be given the keys of Australia to be allowed what he wants to do!
Posted by tigerdicky, 25/08/2010 1:22:02 PM
The country would be set back a century if that happened, tiger, and our GDP would be decimated.
Posted by Bushie Bill, 25/08/2010 2:11:29 PM
Bob might not be spooked, but I bet that the people who have to negotiate with him are.
Posted by Qlander, 25/08/2010 2:41:46 PM
This is no simple country hick, he is a very experienced politician and he knows how the system works, he can't be bought off with trinkets or appeals to higher authority. They can attempt to insult him, belittle him, or demean him and it will be water off a duck's back. He knows what he wants, and he knows that he has a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to get it.
Posted by Qlander, 25/08/2010 2:50:06 PM
Bushie Bill: You have to remember that we're all dumb old rednecks here, so you will need to use your towering and superior intellect to spell out exactly how. Maintaining and developing our non-urban infrastructure, encouraging people to set up businesses away from the major cities, and putting our agricultural industries on an equal footing with the rest of the developed world is going to set us back a century and decimate our GDP.
Posted by Qlander, 25/08/2010 5:07:36 PM
Ok, Qman, I will do whatever I can to continue to help you poor backward people out, but god knows why; I rarely receive any thanks for my wisdom. Here is the first instalment: TMH is talking subsidies and market protection for agricultural industries, a step backward to a time when political graft and corruption was endemic (the time of your Black Jack), and a step guaranteed to distort markets and reduce economic efficiency, and therefore the standard of living for the Australian people at large, artificially boosting the standard of living for a minuscule percentage of the population at the expense of all citizens (taxpayers and consumers). Subsidies and protection are simply a means of transferring income and resources from the efficient to the inefficient, and ensuring intellectually lazy and intellectually corrupt politicians buy the votes of the beneficiaries. Your description of the Mad Hatter @ 1:50:06 PM sounds exactly like a description of Old Joh, and what a disgrace he was for democracy! By his own admission, he had no idea of the concept of separation of powers. The brown paper bag courier service industry is likely to have a high growth rate for a while.
Posted by Bushie Bill, 25/08/2010 7:17:58 PM
I will also ask bushie bill to expand on his comments. As I see it, most of our GDP is made up of including taxes in the price of goods and services. That’s why things are expensive in Australia. If taxes were removed from the cost of goods and services, the price, hence inflation would go down, so yes the GDP would follow. Oddly enough, much business would find this environment to be very good for expanding business, a real GDP increase, not a tax and regulation driven one as we have now. Tell us your way BB.
Posted by dunart, 25/08/2010 10:41:29 PM
Bushie Bill: You could write a book about the problems with international farm subsidies. But the fact is that is the way the developed world has moved. Australia has tried to stand against the tide for 4 decades and the result has been nothing but decimation for agriculture. People can either pay the true cost of food individually at the checkout or they can pay collectively via their tax. That is the option the rest of the world was chosen and there is nothing that we can do about that. We can either join them or allow our agricultural industries and rural communities to collapse completely. Joh lost office over 20 years ago, and the fact that his legacy is his abuse of power, and not his good economic management is a lesson for all politicians. I had to Google who ‘my’ Black Jack is, and as near as I can work out he is pre-World War II, you know the full-scale shooting war that we had with Japan which is now a major ally in trading partner. You are either a seriously old bastard or you are simply regurgitating stories of past perceived injustices that you learned at your grandfather's knee. Class warriors like you are brakes on the wheels of progress.
Posted by Qlander, 26/08/2010 10:16:10 AM
As far as Bob Katter goes he is not going to turn things around in 3 years what will take at least 30, but if he can get the debate centred back onto the real issues facing rural Australia then he will go have done his job. We can no longer afford a statesman-like attitude; the situation is desperate and what we need is a berserker to lead an all or nothing charge.
Posted by Qlander, 26/08/2010 10:18:20 AM
Bushie can cobble together the form of an economically literate commentary but without any of the substance. "Economic efficiency" indeed, Bushie, so what do you mean by that? You seem to believe that most primary production is consumed in Australia when the facts are that 80% of our produce is exported. So it would take an awful big subsidy to make a scrap of difference to the total value chain. Worse is your moronic assumption that global markets are not already distorted. And worse still is your ignorance of the lack of competition, and resulting serious market distortion, in the domestic retail sector. Most countries have both consumer protection legislation and trade protection legislation but here we only have half the deal because the lack of trade protection favours the urban consumer at the producers' expense. It is classic urban hypocrisy. You have no qualms about buying cheap imported products made in sweatshops or using third world labour but you expect farmers to compete in the same market with local labour who don't even want the job anyway. We can't move our farms offshore like urban businesses do every day but you won't let us have guest workers either.
Posted by Ian Mott, 26/08/2010 10:44:30 AM
1 | 2 | 3 | 4  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Independent Member for Kennedy Bob Katter.
Independent Member for Kennedy Bob Katter.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
25 August, 2010
24 August, 2010
POLL
Q: With which major political party should the independents and Greens side in order to help form a minority Government?

Labor
(21.2%)

Coalition
(78.8%)

Total Votes: 816
Poll Date: 22 August, 2010

Most popular articles

ELDERS NEWS MREC SJ



The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...