News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 Political 
 COP 15: We were right to vote down ETS, say Libs 

COP 15: We were right to vote down ETS, say Libs

23 Dec, 2009 11:02 AM
THE failure of the Copenhagen talks to reach any binding deal to beat the impacts of climate change has been hailed as vindication of the Opposition's rejection of an emissions trading scheme in Australia last month.

With significant resistance to the scheme being passed before the outcome from Copenhagen was known, the Opposition – which is still recovering from its disastrous split over the issue - says it was right to vote down legislation to deal with climate change because there is now nothing binding the Government to have it.

Opposition leader, Tony Abbott, said Copenhagen was "a very Kevin Rudd kind of agreement".

"It's been much more talk than action," Mr Abbott said.

"Now, I guess good intentions are better than nothing and it's good that there has been an abundance of intention but there has certainly been no binding agreement and it entirely vindicates the Opposition’s rejection of Kevin Rudd’s great big new tax when the Parliament was sitting earlier this month.

"Mr Rudd was very unwise to try and rush Australia in to an ill-considered and premature emissions tax and I hope that he will now entirely reconsider his climate change policy because pretty obviously the best way to go is direct action to tackle climate change rather than a great big new tax that will hurt our exporters without actually doing anything to help the environment."

Mr Abbott said Prime Minister Kevin Rudd needed to go back to the drawing board and accept that he’d got it wrong on climate change, and wrong on his ability to get international agreements for the kind of policies that he liked.

Nationals leader, Warren Truss, said the "spectacular failure" of the Copenhagen Climate Change Conference was a "clear endorsement of The Nationals unequivocal rejection of Labor’s Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme".

"The Rudd Labor Government has insisted for two years that its CPRS had to be passed by the Australian Parliament before Copenhagen," Mr Truss said.

"However, the CPRS was never an issue during the Copenhagen talkfest, and no-one even suggested that a CPRS was the solution to climate change.

"While some advocated a new global tax on financial transactions, and Prime Minister Rudd was apparently a party to discussions about a new tax on aviation and shipping, no-one was interested in Labor’s CPRS."

But Mr Rudd said Australia would still need an ETS so it could reach its targets, which it would commit to under the new Copenhagen accord next year.

"What's required on climate change is action nationally, and action internationally," Mr Rudd said at the close of negotiations in Copenhagen last week.

"Let's just go to the national actions necessary. 34 of 36 of the developed economies represented here at this conference either have or are in the process of developing emissions trading schemes, to give effect to their national targets.

"Therefore in Australia's case, once our national target is determined, we're going to need a mechanism within Australia to make it work."

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
The Universal Solution of Climate Change– The United World. The United World. Solution all in one. Solution all in built. Knowledgeable new born. Flying lovers Copenhagen. Roaming climate romance. Curiously lost the track. Open battle game war. Traps/tricks counter act. Wisdom voice back track. How to open the heart? Where, the natural love. What some would say? Lost that your mind. Found free and fresh. Memory access upgrade. No hang up No disk crash. Sectors arranged all intact. No pressure no sugar. Smartly moving graphs. Revision Report short vision. Simplicity too evident. Complexity un-designed. Sure insure yes we can. Change the world even. Climate lovers Copenhagen. Climate lovers earth around. Found the magic lamp. Solution all in built. Solution all in one. The United World.
Posted by hari kotadia, 23/12/2009 4:17:51 PM
You were totally right to reject the plan. Primary producers have to pay enough to remain on the land without another Rudd tax.
Posted by High Country Gent, 24/12/2009 8:25:14 AM
Rudd is the kind of person who would willingly join a club that would have Mugabe, Chavez and numerous other thugs as a member. The developing world's elites all enjoy a higher standard of living than the average Australian and have the CO2 emissions to match. And they will be allowed to continue with that carbon intensive lifestyle for as long as they maintain a continuous supply of impoverished slum dwellers to keep their national average emissions per capita very low. Indeed, under the IPCC framework, the more slum dwellers they produce, the lower the per capita emissions and the more UN handouts the thugs will get and the more emissions they will be allowed to make. The only constant in all this is the fact that everything the green/left gonzos touch will turn to crap. It is like North Korean equality. It is the last thing anyone needs.
Posted by Ian Mott, 24/12/2009 8:36:01 AM
Ian, are you telling me that the Copenhagen talk-fest was only about giving more money to dictators and murderers? Is that what the UN wanted? Is that the reason that KRudd wanted his "Money Making" scheme passed before Cop.? KRudd cannot be that bad, he would not tax the Aussie and then give the money to Mugabe, would He?? What a Cynical attitude................
Posted by Peter Carabot, 24/12/2009 9:15:49 AM
I must be remembered that the whole carbon dioxide demonisation is based on complete lies. Carbon dioxide is a beneficial gas. It makes plants grow. It is being used as a tool to try and bring in a one world government. This failed in Copenhagen.
Posted by Len, 24/12/2009 12:03:06 PM
A one world government???? This is a new tack on things! There is not a single country whose way of government would meet the needs or requirements for governing the whole world. Unless, of course, it is of a dictator type where choice would be a thing of the past. Let's keep our nations as separate nations dealing with the needs of their own peoples and then seeking common ground to meet with other nations.
Posted by towardswellness, 26/12/2009 12:31:26 PM
Oh yes he would Peter, if thats what it takes to get a good job in the UN.
Posted by R, 27/12/2009 3:31:31 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Federal Opposition Leader, Tony Abbott.
Federal Opposition Leader, Tony Abbott.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
21 December, 2009
23 December, 2009
POLL
Q: What will be the centre piece of your Christmas feast?

Beef
(9.4%)

Lamb
(8%)

Ham
(26.2%)

Turkey
(20.8%)

Seafood
(18.1%)

Vegetarian
(7.8%)

Other
(9.6%)

Total Votes: 562
Poll Date: 18 December, 2009

Most popular articles

Advertisement



The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...