THE failure of the Copenhagen talks to reach any binding deal to beat the impacts of climate change has been hailed as vindication of the Opposition's rejection of an emissions trading scheme in Australia last month.
With significant resistance to the scheme being passed before the outcome from Copenhagen was known, the Opposition – which is still recovering from its disastrous split over the issue - says it was right to vote down legislation to deal with climate change because there is now nothing binding the Government to have it.
Opposition leader, Tony Abbott, said Copenhagen was "a very Kevin Rudd kind of agreement".
"It's been much more talk than action," Mr Abbott said.
"Now, I guess good intentions are better than nothing and it's good that there has been an abundance of intention but there has certainly been no binding agreement and it entirely vindicates the Opposition’s rejection of Kevin Rudd’s great big new tax when the Parliament was sitting earlier this month.
"Mr Rudd was very unwise to try and rush Australia in to an ill-considered and premature emissions tax and I hope that he will now entirely reconsider his climate change policy because pretty obviously the best way to go is direct action to tackle climate change rather than a great big new tax that will hurt our exporters without actually doing anything to help the environment."
Mr Abbott said Prime Minister Kevin Rudd needed to go back to the drawing board and accept that he’d got it wrong on climate change, and wrong on his ability to get international agreements for the kind of policies that he liked.
Nationals leader, Warren Truss, said the "spectacular failure" of the Copenhagen Climate Change Conference was a "clear endorsement of The Nationals unequivocal rejection of Labor’s Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme".
"The Rudd Labor Government has insisted for two years that its CPRS had to be passed by the Australian Parliament before Copenhagen," Mr Truss said.
"However, the CPRS was never an issue during the Copenhagen talkfest, and no-one even suggested that a CPRS was the solution to climate change.
"While some advocated a new global tax on financial transactions, and Prime Minister Rudd was apparently a party to discussions about a new tax on aviation and shipping, no-one was interested in Labor’s CPRS."
But Mr Rudd said Australia would still need an ETS so it could reach its targets, which it would commit to under the new Copenhagen accord next year.
"What's required on climate change is action nationally, and action internationally," Mr Rudd said at the close of negotiations in Copenhagen last week.
"Let's just go to the national actions necessary. 34 of 36 of the developed economies represented here at this conference either have or are in the process of developing emissions trading schemes, to give effect to their national targets.
"Therefore in Australia's case, once our national target is determined, we're going to need a mechanism within Australia to make it work."