News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 Political 
 Coalition tries to silence climate rebels 

Coalition tries to silence climate rebels

30 Sep, 2009 05:50 AM
THE Opposition emissions trading spokesman, Ian Macfarlane, has tried to quell a rising internal revolt over climate change by emailing every backbencher with a copy of the policy the Coalition took to the last election.

As the Opposition Leader, Malcolm Turnbull, arrived home last night after a week abroad, he faced reports the majority of his back bench opposed his intention to negotiate a deal with the Government, and assertions from within that an emissions trading scheme was never Coalition policy.

The Coalition legislated for such a scheme in its final months in power and took it as policy to the last election. The scheme was designed by a team led the former chief public servant Peter Shergold.

But yesterday climate change rebels Cory Bernardi and Ron Boswell articulated the growing view internally that the policy, devised by John Howard and Mr Turnbull when he was environment minister, was never run past the party room and was therefore questionable.

"I have no recollection of it. I understand there was an agreement between the prime minister and Mr Turnbull," Senator Bernardi said. "It was announced unilaterally just prior to the election and, of course, we did what we thought was in the best interests of the party."

To dispute this, Mr Macfarlane emailed every backbencher with a copy of the policy the Coalition took to the last election as well as the speech Mr Turnbull gave to Parliament in 2007 when he introduced the legislation.

"Everyone was aware of Shergold; everyone knew what it said," he told the Sydney Morning Herald.

The frontbencher Helen Coonan said she recalled the Shergold scheme going to the party room, but another former cabinet minister said it was presented as a fait accompli.

There had been one cabinet discussion about the scheme. Mr Howard had wanted it kept secret so it would not spoil his announcing it at the Liberal Party federal council meeting in July 2007.

"There was never a detailed internal discussion," the former minister said.

Mr Macfarlane met departmental officials in Sydney yesterday seeking more information on Labor's scheme to help him draft amendments.

Specifically, he wanted to see the regulations which will outline crucial detail, and he also sought a report by Morgan Stanley which is believed to have found the Government's scheme will be detrimental to electricity generators.

The Government is refusing to release the report, saying it contains "sensitive commercial information".

Mr Macfarlane said the meeting was "very amicable'' but not very helpful. He said he would press ahead with the amendments regardless and base calls for exemptions and extra compensation on what industry and agriculture was telling him.

"It makes the process difficult and less precise, but it doesn't stop the process," he said.

The shadow cabinet will meet in Adelaide today, and Mr Macfarlane aims to have a framework for the amendments when it meets again next Wednesday. He said they should be finished in time for the resumption of Parliament on October 19.

The Government will reintroduce its legislation in November and if it is rejected by the Senate the Government will have a trigger for an early, double-dissolution election.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
In silencing the rebels they are silencing the populace. In silencing the populace they are showing they have no right to govern.
Posted by Paul, 30/09/2009 8:07:00 AM
This mob is going up in smoke! Why don't they all just blow away!
Posted by tigerdicky, 30/09/2009 8:53:26 AM
Bring on a double dissolution election! I'm ready to vote out the Coalition climate dinosaurs once and for all! I can't wait until 2010!
Posted by Annoyed youngster, 30/09/2009 9:41:41 AM
After 6 years of scientists requesting the data that the climate alarmists use to base their global warming theory on it has finally been released - only to reveal the complete opposite - that the world has cooled and not warmed! http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/
Posted by Paul, 30/09/2009 3:03:54 PM
It is time for the Coalition to stand up for the people who vote for it, and for the rural and regional areas of Australia, who will be decimated if the ETS goes through in its current form. I've always thought the Libs were a gutless lot - please prove me wrong.
Posted by Concerned Northerner, 1/10/2009 5:46:27 AM
I hope they all tell Macfarlane, "so what". They went to the election with a bad policy. How long do they go on before they change it? Come on.
Posted by Bob, 1/10/2009 6:34:46 AM
The Nats must stand their ground. With reports showing that the world will have trouble feeding itself, putting Australian food producers out of business is sheer lunacy.

The Lib voters, like Labor, don't seem to have any idea what goes on outside metropolitan boundaries.

If Australian farmers can't produce the food it will be imported from the countries that don't have emission restictions on primary products.

Our socalled leaders can't be that stupid, so there must be some other smelly agenda.

Posted by R, 1/10/2009 8:06:28 AM
Could someone explain to Macfarlane that most voters at the last election still believed that the stock market would continue to rise indefinitely. Reality intervened, circumstances changed and policies have been adjusted.

No amount of posturing on climate was ever going to alter voting intentions so to claim that the policy is set in stone only highlights Macfarlane and Turnbull's tenuous appreciation of the situation.

It is time to give the voters a clear choice on climate sleaze and force them to accept responsibility for their choices.

It may mean some short-term pain but all this fence sitting only provides the voters with a comfortable cop-out and delays Rudd's inevitable rendezvous with electoral reality and the roosting chooks.

Posted by Ian Mott, 1/10/2009 9:01:26 AM
Paul, do you realise that Jennifer Marohasy works for the Institute of Public Affairs, a right wing think tank funded, among others, by the mining industry and other corporate interests who sell fossil fuels? She does not represent the interests of The Land readers, many of whom depend on the ongoing viability of our rural regions (indeed as we all ultimately do), and it really amazes me that The Land continues to give her a voice.
Posted by George, 1/10/2009 9:35:23 AM
I challange Ian Mott to say anything positive about anything.
Posted by the lorax, 1/10/2009 9:42:39 AM
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
29 September, 2009
28 September, 2009
POLL
Q: Should politicians who retire mid-term be fined to help recover the costs of holding a by-election?

Yes
(73.4%)

No
(22%)

Undecided
(4.7%)

Total Votes: 473
Poll Date: 27 September, 2009

Most popular articles

Advertisement



The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...