News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 Political 
 Coalition plan to shield costs to agriculture 

Coalition plan to shield costs to agriculture

19 Oct, 2009 05:46 AM
COALITION amendments to the proposed emissions trading scheme will shield heavy polluting industry from the short-term costs of a carbon price.

The amendments, which were approved by the Coalition party room last night, are broadly in line with several proposals from business groups, such as the Business Council of Australia (BCA), who have been lobbying the Opposition for several months.

The Coalition will hand out $10 billion in compensation for coal-fired electricity generators, who have argued recently that the costs of the Government's scheme would mean they could not meet debt repayments and would have to shut down.

The Opposition will also adopt an "intensity" approach for electricity generators, which would mean they would have to buy less carbon permits than the Government's scheme, which the Opposition argues would limit electricity price rises, shielding small business and households.

Coal-fired electricity makes up about 44 per cent of Australia's greenhouse gas emissions, and is currently expected to receive $3.9 billion in compensation over five years from the Government's trading scheme plans.

The Opposition is also seeking to exclude methane emissions from coal mines and move to permanently ban agriculture's inclusion in any trading scheme.

But other amendments will allow farmers to make money out of an emissions trading scheme by replanting trees and storing more carbon in the soil.

The Government has delayed until 2013 a decision on agriculture, which accounts for 18 per cent of the nation's greenhouse gases.

Another amendment would result in food processors, such as milk and meat producers, receiving free carbon permits.

The Opposition will also give huge concessions to trade-exposed polluting industry, meaning all will receive 94.5 per cent free permits, dropping to 90 per cent in 2015. Those free permits will continue until 80 per cent of the industries' international competitors are faced with a carbon price.

Acting Opposition spokesman on climate change Ian Macfarlane said the Opposition will pay for extra compensation by taking money from the sale of carbon permits from 2015-2025, and reducing household compensation because of lesser electricity hikes.

The focus will now be on Prime Minister Kevin Rudd, Climate Change Minister Penny Wong and their response to the proposed amendments.

Senator Wong said any amendments proposed by the Opposition would have to be financially and environmentally responsible.

The Government has made much of its insistence on including coal mining and electricity generation in its trading scheme, and has so far rejected heavy lobbying by the coal industry for more compensation.

While business groups will be happy if the Opposition amendments are adopted, the Government risks losing the support of a number of key environmental and union allies.

Yesterday the heads of the Australian Conversation Foundation, WWF, Climate Institute, Australian Council of Social Service and the ACTU said they would withdraw support for the Government's policy if Opposition amendments were accepted.

"The Government should reject the Opposition's amendments if they take the scheme backwards and the Opposition is unwilling to change them," Australian Conservation Foundation executive director Don Henry said.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
It is not reasonable that agriculture should experience none of the direct pain - excluded from inclusion in an ETS - but benefit from the economic opportunities through the provision of saleable offsets. This is particularly so as ABARE modelling indicates that 2% of farms would be required to directly participate in the ETS (buy and sell permits). Surely, the only justification for agriculture's direct benefit from the ETS is full participation. On that basis, agriculture would be sharing the costs and the opportunties in line with the rest of the community. Agriculture has an important part to play and it has real opportunties for development. It needs to be part of the process, not just looking to cherrry pick the benefits.
Posted by Tim, 20/10/2009 7:34:01 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
POLL
Q: Who do you think is the best person to lead the Federal Liberal Party?

Malcolm Turnbull
(46.4%)

Julie Bishop
(5.7%)

Tony Abbott
(10.3%)

Joe Hockey
(23.6%)

Other
(14.1%)

Total Votes: 760
Poll Date: 18 October, 2009
BLOGS
15 October, 2009

Most popular articles

Advertisement



The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...