News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 Political 
 Carbon cuts will 'create 4m jobs' 

Carbon cuts will 'create 4m jobs'

19 May, 2010 07:04 AM
BIG CUTS to carbon emissions and heavy investment in green technologies will create 3.7 million jobs across Australia by 2030, economic modelling commissioned for unions and green groups shows.

The ACTU and Australian Conservation Foundation will today launch the modelling project, which has been six months in the works, in an effort to show serious efforts to tackle climate change will create jobs even in areas dominated by the mining and electricity industries.

The modelling breaks Australia into 65 regions and suggests that just one - far-western NSW - will lose jobs if Australia adopts a 25 per cent emissions reduction target by 2020, sets up an emissions trading scheme and makes significant investment in green technologies and energy efficiency.

Other areas across Australia, including those dominated by coal mining and energy industries like Gladstone and Rockhampton in Queensland and the Hunter Valley in NSW, will see job growth in the region.

The report finds that overall jobs will increase by 36 per cent across Australia in 20 years.

''The report shows regional areas, even those which produce coal and generate electricity, will have more jobs if we take strong action to cut pollution, but only if we act now,'' ACTU president Sharan Burrow said.

Along with an emissions trading scheme and a 25 per cent emissions cut, the modelling assumes the Australian government will invest directly in targeted regional industry planning, electric cars, public transport and reducing household emissions, among others.

The programs assumed under the modelling would require an investment of on average 2.5 per cent of GDP over the next 20 years. The report finds that if investment is made households will be 10 per cent better off by 2030, and GDP growth would average 3.2 per cent to 2030.

The modelling was conducted by the National Institute of Economic and Industry Research. It does not model jobs growth with no climate policies because it says that scenario is unlikely given the global push to decarbonise economies.

The institute's Ian Manning told the Herald that the modelling also reinforces the position of the International Energy Agency that ''procrastination'' on investment in a low-carbon economy will increase costs and hurt job growth.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Will they be real jobs or just greek jobs .25% of their work force are govt jobs no wonder they are one of the pig economies.Govt spending in the bush,when has this ever happened ?Modelling based on flawed assumptions is just short stroking .
Posted by THE FARMER, 19/05/2010 8:55:47 AM
This study is a modelling project only. In other words, garbage in-garbage out. A study by the University of Madrid earlier this year found that for every green job that had been created in Spain, 2.2 real jobs were destroyed.
Posted by Arden, 20/05/2010 7:29:24 AM
What a joke, i heard these clowns on the radio, they had no idea! They want to build more renewable energy that doesnt work, like wind. People are sick of constant pushing for things that will make someone money, but cost the rest of us. Cut out all government handouts to the renewable energy industries that dont work, give the money to those that will work.
Posted by mick, 20/05/2010 7:49:16 AM
Arden; it's not just Spain, right across Europe the economic folly of the carbon fantasy is crashing home. From the corruption and loss of confidence in the carbon market. To the realisation that windmills were an incredibly expensive mistake.
Posted by Qlander, 20/05/2010 8:48:31 AM
The unions + Greenies + economists+ carbon traders=DISASTER. Its time some one told these people where to go.Try creating real jobs for the ones they destroyed over the years.Victorian coal reserves are good for another 100 years, no doubt Queensland is the same.Why change a winning formula or like Keudd try to tax it out of existence. Wheres Wong these days has some one put her out to grass.?
Posted by Woolie, 20/05/2010 9:01:53 AM
Warning, Will Robinson, shonk alert. These people treat government investment as if it were an injection of new funds but the reality is that governments must take funds from one sector to deliver funds to another. And of course, the sector that the funds will come from is the ordinary consumer who will get higher taxes and lower quality health, education, police and defence services. And these reduced services will flow through to the entire business sector and produce a reverse multiplier effect that, in credible economic models, will offset the boost in the favoured sector. And not having examined the detail of the models, it is almost a certainty that the results for regional Australia hinge on vast tracts of land converted to imaginary forests, growing at imaginary growth rates, sequestering imaginary carbon and producing imaginary profits for the local region. The reality will be the usual urban spivs using tax funds to ruin catchment water yields, destroy contributive farm land and whip all cash flow back to the city before it gets anywhere near the region they claim it will help. Get real, folks. It is climate crap, of course it's bull$hit, it couldn't be anything else.
Posted by Ian Mott, 20/05/2010 9:21:59 AM
"Create 4million jobs' hahahaha hahaha hahaha hahaha hahhahaha - ooh my stomach hurts - hahahaha hahahaha hahaha hahaha. Oooh stop. Flies in the face of the European experience, especially Spain. Sure... green, usually subsidised, jobs were established but the displacing of efficient jobs in other industries means nett job losses. Modelling... hahahahah hahahaha hahaha. ohhh.. my tummy.
Posted by DMS, 20/05/2010 9:26:32 AM
Mick, and agriculture hasn't and doesn't receive any subsidies and support from government does it!!!! Interesting that often the term clowns is reserved to those researches and that research that produces results that don't align to what you want to hear. A common ailment in this forum.
Posted by marc, 20/05/2010 10:29:30 AM
What are you saying marc? It doesnt make sense! Climate crap and subsidies are a bad joke, and since when was any farmer in this country subsidised? why do you need to resort to telling lies to try to promote what is a total farce. I bet you have a finger in the pie somewhere?
Posted by mick, 20/05/2010 11:26:54 AM
Hmmm, interesting retort mick, however quite typical of this forum's banter: one eyed, emotive, most often baseless and unsubstantiated and reflecting poorly on rural and regional Australia. In reference to your question regarding subsidies; diesel rebates, exceptional circumstances support, the NHT/Caring for our Country programs and government funded rural/agricultural R&D immediately come to mind.
Posted by marc, 20/05/2010 11:50:09 AM
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
POLL
Q: What should the government's priority be when considering the future zoning of agriculture lands?

Protection of existing peri-urban farmlands
(29.1%)

Encouragement of new agricultural enterprises in rural areas
(31.6%)

Striking a better balance between urban development and farming
(39.3%)

Total Votes: 351
Poll Date: 17 May, 2010

Most popular articles

Advertisement



The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...