News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 Political 
 Andrew Robb's bombshell a long time coming 

Andrew Robb's bombshell a long time coming

26 Nov, 2009 07:41 AM
ANDREW Robb's stunning defection had been a long time coming - even if Malcolm Turnbull didn't see it before it hit him between the eyes.

Well before he quit the front bench last month to seek treatment for depression, Robb had given speech after speech slamming Labor's emissions trading scheme. He never wavered in his preference for an alternative climate scheme - one based on modelling by Frontier Economics for the Coalition and independent senator Nick Xenophon.

When Turnbull wanted to negotiate amendments to Labor's scheme in August, as the bills went to the Senate for the first time, Robb argued forcefully against. The Coalition voted no.

Around that time, some MPs floated the idea of Robb taking on a leadership role as a ''safe pair of hands'' to avoid oblivion at the next election. The putsch never eventuated. In fact, it forced Robb to confront his own demons: the depression that had hung over him like a black cloud every morning for the past 50 years.

The former federal party director knew he could never even consider a leadership role unless he could treat and beat the depression. He sought leave from the front bench to tackle it, and his leader appointed climate convert Ian Macfarlane to fill Robb's role.

Turnbull's instincts to negotiate with Labor could no longer be suppressed. He pressed for Coalition party room authority to negotiate amendments to the Labor scheme - and won. Macfarlane went to work in talks with Climate Minister Penny Wong.

During the weeks that ensued, Robb was still a player behind the scenes. His staff were seconded to the leader's office to work on the negotiation. Robb was given free access to everything by Macfarlane. He was taken into confidences.

But he was growing increasingly frustrated by the deal and how Turnbull had made it a leadership issue - forcing the Coalition to back it or cripple his leadership authority. Robb was tetchy it left no room for people like him - who back a carbon price but not the Labor model - to chart a middle course between the sceptics and the deal-makers.

He was also infuriated by how Turnbull had handled secret research he'd commissioned from Frontier, which found the Labor plan would put a $2.5 billion hole in the budget. Turnbull had shown it to Wong - but not to his own MPs. The decision to keep it from the Coalition also fed Robb's disillusionment.

In the final week, his misgivings came to a head. On Sunday night, he decided to speak out against the Coalition backing the amended scheme.

But instead of warning either Turnbull or Macfarlane, he kept his own counsel - fearing they would try to blunt his impact by bumping him down the speakers list in the party room meeting on Tuesday morning.

He also kept his plans from his staff, not wanting to compromise them.

His speech, when it came, was a bombshell. Both his leader and Macfarlane were stunned. So was everyone else in the room, friend and foe alike. One senior frontbencher described it as ''the greatest act of treachery'' they had seen in 25 years in politics. But others defended his intervention as ''courageous and principled … simply magnificent''.

But the effort of the defiance took its toll. Robb, who is still struggling with his condition and finding the experimental doses of medication variously ineffective and exhausting, was spent. He returned to his office for a kip.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Why would Turnbull see it coming? He is too busy looking at himself in the mirror!
Posted by tigerdicky, 26/11/2009 8:29:30 AM
Yeah and the big losers were the Australian people www.twawki.wordpress.com As Joanne Nova said: "Australia is in the extraordinary position of passing legislation that is known to be based on fraudulent science." And Terry Mc Crann said: "We had a prime minister who declared economic war on his own country. And an opposition leader who spent the rest of the day trying desperately to make it unanimous."
Posted by twawki, 26/11/2009 8:45:31 AM
Malcolm is doomed together with any of the others involved in the cruel live animal trade. Live animal exports and intensive farming have been allowed to happen only because of people in politics and in parliament. So it doesn't really matter which side of politics there are on, soon a name and shame list will be very much out there complete with pictures of the industries some of these people on both sides are involved in - and in bed with.
Posted by Wendy Lewthwaite, 27/11/2009 6:09:39 AM
Why would politicians want to rush through legislation when the facts of the matter are far from clear and change materially with every model presented? If climate change takes place it is a very long process - not meaning we should not want cleaner air or whatever - but does mean spending another 5 years or whatever "under discussion" will not compromise the future of the planet. There is already community pressure for organisations to reduce polution emmissions, which is having some impact other factors aside.
Posted by JayDin, 27/11/2009 8:25:59 AM
Ian Macfarlane needs to take his sinister voice to the movie making sets and Malcolm Turnbull should return to the showers and waves at Bondi. They have no place in rural Australia - the powerhouse of our economy which they are hell bent on destroying.
Posted by Common Cents, 27/11/2009 9:44:36 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Dissenting backbenchers Wilson Tuckey centre top, failed leadership aspirant Kevin Andrews right and Andrew Robb left, in Parliament. Photo: Andrew Meares
Dissenting backbenchers Wilson Tuckey centre top, failed leadership aspirant Kevin Andrews right and Andrew Robb left, in Parliament. Photo: Andrew Meares
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
25 November, 2009
24 November, 2009
POLL
Q: How has the deregulation of export wheat marketing affected your farm's profits this harvest?

Increased profits
(22.1%)

Decreased profits
(56.2%)

No change
(21.7%)

Total Votes: 258
Poll Date: 23 November, 2009
BLOGS
11 November, 2009
19 November, 2009
SPECIAL FEATURES

Most popular articles

ELDERS NEWS MREC FW



The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...