News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Wong excludes ag; ETS a 'done deal' 

Wong excludes ag; ETS a 'done deal'

15 Nov, 2009 04:05 PM
AUSTRALIA is likely to have an emissions trading scheme locked in by the end of next week, with the Government caving in to a key Coalition demand to permanently exclude the farming sector.

In a significant concession, and a huge win for the farming lobby, a senior Government source revealed Labor will this week agree to exclude agriculture from the scheme "indefinitely" - knocking out a key sticking point in negotiations with the Opposition.

In a further concession, the Government will also examine giving farmers the opportunity to earn cash by selling carbon offsetting credits on the open market, including Opposition Leader Malcolm Turnbull's favoured "biochar" method of storing carbon in soil.

"This is all about us showing how serious we are in getting the Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme through the Parliament this fortnight and is obviously the biggest move we have made in the negotiations," the source said.

Labor had previously signalled the farm sector would likely be included in the scheme in 2015, after a review in 2013.

The backdown has significantly increased the odds that amended legislation will be stamped into law before Parliament winds up for the year at the end of next week. Even if a majority of Coalition senators opposes the bill as expected, the scheme will still pass with Labor only needing an extra seven votes.

This would allow Prime Minister Kevin Rudd to present Australia's plan to the Copenhagen climate summit, which begins on December 7.

The scheme, which will require businesses to hold saleable permits for the emissions they produce, would begin in July 2011, lifting prices for energy and most consumer products.

Critics, including Coalition MPs, say it will hurt the economy by lifting costs for consumers and businesses, while doing nothing to halt climate change.

But international research released today shows Australians are more likely to support paying for the cost of climate change through higher petrol and electricity prices than almost any other developed country.

The World Wide Views on Global Warming project, which surveyed 4000 people in 38 countries over one weekend in September, found Australians wanted the Federal Government to take tougher action on climate change at home and a strong position at the international negotiations next month.

But critics of the Government's scheme who already believe it does not go far enough and has been overly diluted by huge concessions to incumbent power producers, exporters and mining companies, will be dismayed at the farming exemption.

A deal would represent a significant victory for Mr Turnbull, who has staked his leadership on the issue by declaring he is not prepared to lead a party not as committed to climate change as he is.

But in an ongoing political nightmare for Mr Turnbull, the Coalition remains hopelessly divided on the issue, with dissenters such as Opposition Senate leader Nick Minchin and Nationals Senate leader Barnaby Joyce openly hostile to his efforts.

A recent analysis of likely Senate voting intensions showed an agreement would severely test this authority, with 23 out of 37 Coalition senators deemed likely to either vote against amended legislation or fail to vote.

Government leader in the Senate Chris Evans has written to the Opposition, the Greens and the minor players informing them that the next two weeks will be almost entirely dedicated to the bill.

The letter warns the Government will "seek to extend the sitting hours and days if required", with debate on the legislation set to begin on Tuesday.

"The Government is committed to ensuring the CPRS is debated by the Senate in a thorough and comprehensive way, and voted on this year to provide Australian business with much needed certainty," the letter says.

It follows the release of a report by the Government yesterday warning rising sea levels triggered by climate change could damage or destroy 247,600 buildings valued at $63 billion.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
What! This IS ridiculous.
Posted by Britt, 15/11/2009 4:57:08 PM
4000 people in 38 countries. That's not ridiculous, it's a TOTAL JOKE. I haven't met 1 Australian who wants an ETS.
Posted by Reg, 15/11/2009 7:11:40 PM
Why is it so "ridiculous" Britt? We are the ONLY sector to have cut emissions in the last decade. There is an increasing NEED for food, and decreasing amount of land to use for food as people like to expand the cities onto good farming land. There was way too much variation in the figures that were produced in the science of calculating the emissions, and there was no research into how much carbon was taken in. You cannot only go at it one way. It is a good decision, there is no way that ag should have been included in the first place.
Posted by Bruce, 15/11/2009 7:17:12 PM
I don't want a ETS. All it will mean is higher energy prices for no benefit. We will not have secure power when Labor closes down coal-fired power stations. Then how will the greenies watch their plasma big screen TVs.
Posted by PeterT, 15/11/2009 11:02:52 PM
Excluded at the moment.
Posted by shaun, 15/11/2009 11:05:24 PM
I've heard that the whole global warming thing is a hoax fueled by the world banking system - any wonder they are not taking any notice of true science and are pumping us full of propaganda like "the sea will rise 1 Metre". It's not about the enviroment at all. It's about greed and control of people.
Posted by Melisa, 16/11/2009 6:20:00 AM
Although it's great that farming is excluded, I get the feeling this is just being rushed through so Kevin can say what a good boy he is at Copenhagen.
Posted by Darren D, 16/11/2009 6:47:45 AM
The ETS is total nonsense, Turnbull is playing the stock broker again, selling and buying things that don't exist (I think that caused the global crisis - or could be wrong). Australia should not even turn up at Copenhagen. There will be 20,000 delegates attending, 90% of them talking crap - how can they change any thing? Certainly not the weather.
Posted by Woolie, 16/11/2009 8:07:33 AM
Well done Malcolm for holding out on such an important issue for we country folk. I dare say amendments for betterment of any issues will arise from this and that can only be a great thing. I defy anyone to tell me that the people on the land are not the best people to look after their holdings and I have seen remarkable adjustments to management in all manner of agriculture since the start of the drought particularly, but fail to see any changes in the way the mining and power generators, city drivers and manufacturing polluters have changed their practices.
Posted by krakkatinny, 16/11/2009 8:23:41 AM
"But international research released today shows Australians are more likely to support paying for the cost of climate change through higher petrol and electricity prices than almost any other developed country." Did anyone ask Australians?????
Posted by jerangle, 16/11/2009 8:36:46 AM
1 | 2 | 3 | 4  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Ian Linklater's farm in Gol Gol will be spared an ETS. Photo: Simon O'Dwyer
Ian Linklater's farm in Gol Gol will be spared an ETS. Photo: Simon O'Dwyer
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
12 November, 2009
13 November, 2009
POLL
Q: Do you believe your farm business can profit from an emissions trading scheme?

Yes
(20.3%)

No
(70.1%)

Undecided
(9.6%)

Total Votes: 606
Poll Date: 15 November, 2009
BLOGS
11 November, 2009

Most popular articles

Advertisement



The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...