News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Why broadband for the bush was crucial to independents 

Why broadband for the bush was crucial to independents

07 Sep, 2010 04:18 PM
A national broadband network (NBN) offers rural Australia a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to put itself on a more equal footing with urban centres: don’t let the chance slip by, a leading telecommunications consultant warns.

Paul Budde, who runs his international consultancy BuddeComm from Bucketty, in the lower Hunter Valley, said regardless of the flavour of the NBN, it is a concept that has tremendous scope for driving development in the bush.

“We’ll only get one chance at this,” Mr Budde said. “It’s not a matter of fiddling around now and letting it go, hoping that in five years time someone will come back with $5 billion to fix it for us.

“In 2005, regional Australia was in the lead, telling Canberra what it needed. Unfortunately, people like Barnaby Joyce and Fiona Nash fell by the wayside, and we lost that momentum for regional broadband. It’s a worry to me, that we don’t have that momentum now.”

To be successful, the NBN “needs to drive fibre as deep as possible into regional Australia”, Mr Budde believes.

“People may say that they don’t want to wait 15 years, and ask for wireless broadband in the interim: I have no issue with that. But the end game should not be a wireless solution for most of regional Australia.”

Wireless is a highly effective solution - Telstra last week ramped up its Next G service to 42 megabits per second - but Mr Budde said the system bogs down if a high number of users are working from the same tower.

The ideal solution, he suggests, is for fibre to service regional population centres, with farms sharing wireless services.

Mr Budde dismissed the Coalition broadband plan, which relies on private enterprise to drive services into the bush, as lacking the necessary scope to create revolutionary change.

However, he said an NBN with a “Coalition flavour” is readily achievable.

Mr Budde also believes that those who dismiss the idea of a nation-building NBN as a grandiose distraction don’t appreciate the power of the idea.

Concepts like “e-health”, where an isolated country GP can talk one-to-one with specialists anywhere in the world, or even provide regular virtual consultations to people confined to their homes, have the potential to dramatically change the nature of rural health services.

It’s ironic, he said, that older generations that have the least interest in the potential of broadband could have a lot to gain from e-health in the last 10 years of their life, typically the most medically expensive years.

Children and teachers in small country schools could get live access to education initiatives from around the world. And a fast fibre network would go a long way towards erasing the rural-urban divide for businesses seeking locations with a lower cost structure.

“People are drawn to living in rural and regional areas; it’s a dream that many have. But fast broadband is critical in making that a reality.”

Innovative thinking will be essential in making the NBN a financial and social success.

In Norway, Lyse Tele has made fibre more affordable to remote locations by allowing households to dig their own trenches - an option that removes about a third of the cost.

Mr Budde said that cooperatives of farmers could easily get together to dig trenches to homesteads, putting a fibre connection within their reach.

“You can skin the cat in many different ways. Just don’t throw the whole thing out and go back to 2005,” he said.

“Something like 400 volunteers have worked on the NBN concept. This is not a Labor or Liberal issue. This is a national issue, and it shouldn’t be killed as the Coalition wants to do.”

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
But what is the timetable for the "role out"? Sometime before the year 3000?
Posted by susan, 7/09/2010 7:05:17 PM
How exceedingly short sighted of this type of thinking: what rural areas need is better roads. Nothing grandiose about having access to earn that dollar. End of story.
Posted by FarmerJo, 7/09/2010 10:50:54 PM
Disappointed with independants on broadband. This is a small side issue compared to the mess the country is in. Maybe for facebook enthusiasts it is, but not the broader community.
Posted by les, 8/09/2010 7:12:21 AM
Regional Australia will attract industry and companies will be more likely to set up in regional Australia if we have those services. We won't be a backwater. People will want to live here rather than leave here. Go the "Bravehearts" Tony and Rob.
Posted by Mike, 8/09/2010 9:02:58 AM
It goes to show how dumb we really are? A few baubles chucked in the mix and there we have it. The NBN is not what the everyday home user will need, ADSL1 or ADSL2 is quite sufficient for home users. You cannot give every house 100Mbps. If you give several million households 100Mbps bandwidth, then you have exceeded the entire bandwidth of the whole internet. We will never receive the 100mb/s due to the contention rate. The other factor is that Australia is connected to the rest of the world using underwater cables that cannot handle the speed being talked about. We now have a Government that proved itself to be the most deceitful government in our history, the most inefficient and incompetent we could ever imagine who have taken us into debt we may never recover from and these independents tell us it's because of a NBN. What a load of cobblers!
Posted by Alan Mears, 8/09/2010 9:35:12 AM
Have any of you lot tried to conduct e-business with businesses in regional and rural Australia? I know I have - I do it for a living. My customers WANT to do business via the net, but they can't because the service they get is so slow. No-one is denying the importance of schools and hospitals (which are primarily a state concern) but the NBN is critical to Australia remaining functional and competitive into the future. No, it's not a load of old cobblers; it's something I deal with for 60+ hours a week, and under the Coalition's half-arsed plan, it could only get worse.
Posted by Digi-Girl, 8/09/2010 12:32:37 PM
Alan Mears, you are spot on.
Posted by yoyo, 8/09/2010 1:59:47 PM
How regional & rural are we talking, Digi-Girl? I live in the far western parts of Qld, & realise that our area would still be regarded as suburban by much of the real rural areas. Can't imagine the day that the fibre will go through our place, with the neighbours to the north 22k away, & 35k to the south. Having said that, with a pretty antiquated computer (& a pretty antiquated operator) we get good, fast enough reliable wireless broadband via satellite to allow us to buy & sell livestock & wool, operate on the share market, shop online worldwide for anything we want, manage our banking & accounting, watch live news broadcasts etc, & do most things we would hope or need to do within our business. With Labor's record, by the time this scheme is rolled out, it will cost twice as much to construct, & the connections & usage will be so expensive nobody will want it.
Posted by a GRAZIER, 8/09/2010 3:03:13 PM
FarmerJo, les, Alan M and yoyo (great name! -as in "up and down like a...?), do you want to live in and believe there is a better future in a declining, stagnating and dying environment losing population, or a thriving, vibrant and expanding environment with a growing population? Which option do you think might bring you the best services and facilities? The difference, in a ten-twenty years view, will be determined by one factor only, and that is top-of the-range communications, and in a country like Australia, with vast geographical size compared with population, top communication is the NBN. It delivers communication at effectively the speed of light, and if you think any new technology can do better than that, I suggest you dust off your old school science and physics books, and reread them (or is it more correct to say read them?). And perhaps when you have done that, you could advise your new-learned knowledge to Tony and the Rabbits, and all the other morons too lazy to think beyond the front gate. For those who think we can’t afford NBN, in reality, we can’t afford not to make this investment (note it is an investment and not a consumption expense) in the country’s future.
Posted by Bushie Bill, 10/09/2010 11:07:50 AM
Just like the greatest moral challenge of our lifetime aye BB? We cannot afford, not, to take action, huh. You make assumptions on who has or hasn't read as if you are the sage of all time. I suggest you take these words in context, "Contention Rate" and research them, stay away from your usual one eyed wikipedia and look somewhere reputable. Then research the current speeds of ADSL1 & ADSL2 and what they can deliver. This NBN is nothing but a socialist plan to create a monopoly on a technology that will be redundant before it is rolled out. As usual you start your childish arguments off like a schoolgirl by attacking those with opposing views with no substance to your arguments. Imagine if you once started an argument by presenting a case rather than attacking a person's character.
Posted by Alan Mears, 10/09/2010 4:57:55 PM
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
07 September, 2010
POLL
Q: Do you believe a minority government formed with the support of the independents can provide a stable and effective administration?

Yes
(23.5%)

No
(70.6%)

Undecided
(6%)

Total Votes: 904
Poll Date: 05 September, 2010

Most popular articles

Advertisement



The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...