News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Why Barnaby said thank you to Penny 

Why Barnaby said thank you to Penny

02 Dec, 2009 09:44 AM
BARNABY Joyce started his response to the final debate on the emissions trading legislation with a big "thank you" to Penny Wong and the Government last night.

Thank you, said The Nationals leader in the Senate, for uniting the Coalition.

While it was a sarcastic quip that got a few laughs at the end of a bitterly divisive week, Senator Joyce was getting at something deeper – the fact that the two conservative parties were now strangely at one in opposing the emissions trading scheme, which The Nationals had done from day one.

The ETS might have torn apart Malcolm Turnbull's career as leader of the Liberal Party, but the turmoil has strengthened the resolve and vindicated the long-held position of The Nationals that the proposed carbon pollution reductions scheme (CPRS) will only be "a massive new tax that will do nothing to reduce the temperature of the globe".

Party Leader Warren Truss admits The Nationals were even starting to do quite well out of all the Liberal turmoil stemming from its initial position to support the legislation.

"We believe the scheme was bad, we came to that conclusion early in the piece, we've been strong and united in that regard and obviously the public of Australia have responded," Mr Truss said.

"What the Liberal Party experienced was a grass roots revolt. People ringing up their offices saying they wanted the scheme opposed.

"We were getting the same calls, the same letters.

"We were getting people calling us to see how they could form Nationals branches; how they could back candidates.

"There was a very strong response from the public about any suggestion we might be supporting this scheme.

"It's been an experience to be strong, to be forthright, and the public respect that."

Mr Truss said his party still wanted something to be done about global warming, but in a completely different way to that proposed.

"We came to the last election with a policy to reduce carbon emissions; we supported the renewable energy targets. We supported the targets Kevin Rudd will be taking to Copenhagen," Mr Truss said.

"Our difference is the way in which you achieve that.

"We believe you need to do practical things that actually reduce CO2 emissions but a new tax doesn't do that.

"Selling pieces of paper doesn't reduce the climate; doesn't reduce the CO2 emissions. You need to undertake actually practical measures.

"If you sell a piece of paper, you haven't done anything to reduce C02 emissions."

Mr Abbott also quickly moved to tighten ties with The Nationals, telling his first press conference as leader that he "always thought that a Liberal is a city National, and a National is a country Liberal".

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size


comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
I knew along this bloke was a closet socialist!
Posted by tigerdicky, 2/12/2009 9:51:53 AM
It’s a relief that the ETS has been flushed down the dunny where it belongs, a taxation burden in the place of good policy making was always a nerdy stupid thing to do as a solution to co2 emissions.
Posted by ken, 2/12/2009 12:33:19 PM
My oppositions towards the ETS is exactlly as Warren Truss has said. Just about all people recognise there is a major issue effecting our climate. Someting has to be done. The process needs to be more consultative (I have no idea what form the ETS would take) moving to incentive to reduce or capture carbon and other "greenhouse" based emissions. Agriculture will ultimately be the greatest provider of carbon capture and the world just gets hungrier and hungrier. Why K.Rudd and P.Wong could not wait till the rest of the world showed their hand was to me offensive. The Liberal party should have looked hard and fast at the consequences of the Liberal Governments desire to be first at the "level playing field" of global trading. Australian agriculture gets shafted on the world stage because trade barriers where never lifted and farm bills and subsidies have more recently been reinstated. Fantastic ideals with no substance.
Posted by Lincoln, 3/12/2009 6:11:30 AM
Yes, Lincoln, the people who gave us the obscene "Cheese Mountain", "Milk Lake" and "Trade Bull$#@t" which ripped the guts out of global agricultural markets are the same clowns who are now gathering for Copenhagen to stack the deck in their own favour again. And isn't it just curious that our exports are carbon intensive while theirs are not. So they can import products made from our aluminium but we get stuck with the carbon bill? And isn't it curious how they can import all their paper products without registering the related emissions? And isn't it curious that the countries that import our food don't get the carbon footprint that comes with it? If carbon is to be properly accounted for then it must follow the product to the ultimate consumer. At the moment many countries are not debited for the carbon emissions embodied in their imports and this produces a grossly distorted picture. Does the world community seriously want us to stop feeding the worlds poor? Obviously not. So why does their accounting system encourage exactly that.
Posted by Ian Mott, 3/12/2009 6:56:36 AM
Barnaby should be promoted to the new opposition Agriculture Minister. He would do us proud. John Cobb is lost in this job. Come on Tony give us the right person for the job. Kay Hull and Fiona Nash should be promoted as well. They are both outstanding politicians with their fingers on the pulse of what Australians need and are not afraid of a fight.
Posted by Hopeful, 3/12/2009 6:59:11 AM
It is still hard to believe that common sense has prevailed, at least temporarily. Good on you Barnaby for your grit and providing that leadership. Pity we won't have a double dissolution to get rid of some of the disgraceful and disgusting rabble in the lower house, and change the government.
Posted by denis, 3/12/2009 7:46:57 AM
We were all wondering what happened Warren Truss - never heard a word from him in anything that we saw. Good on the Nationals though.
Posted by SuzieQ, 3/12/2009 11:14:07 AM
I like Barnaby. He is a common sense politician. They are extremely rare.
Posted by High Country Gent, 3/12/2009 11:30:13 AM
I prayed for you Tony & Barnaby on Tuesday and I could not believe my prayers were answered. I say thank you God that truth has prevailed over greed, corruption and ignorance. We need more prayer to see this one through to the end. Then we need to rebuild this country with production - not tax production out of existence.
Posted by Common Cents, 3/12/2009 3:36:38 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Nationals Senate Leader Barnaby Joyce.
Nationals Senate Leader Barnaby Joyce.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
01 December, 2009
POLL
Q: If an election were held next weekend, for which party would you vote?

Labor
(13.8%)

Liberal
(31%)

National
(34.5%)

Greens
(12.7%)

Family First
(1.3%)

Independent
(4.3%)

Other
(2.4%)

Total Votes: 1267
Poll Date: 29 November, 2009
SPECIAL FEATURES

Most popular articles

Advertisement



The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...