News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 What does climate hold? 

What does climate hold?

10 Jan, 2011 03:00 AM
Will farmers get a break when the current La Nina subsides?

The Bureau of Meterology's cautious answer is "maybe". Neutral conditions are forecast to prevail for a while after La Nina takes her last bow sometime in late summer or autumn—except that no-one is quite sure what "neutral" conditions look like anymore.

And La Nina may hold more havoc up her damp sleeve before she exits the climatic stage.

The Bureau of Meterology (BoM) continues to run with its prediction of an above-average season for tropical cyclones, thanks to La Nina's strength and the current warmth of the Coral and Arafura seas.

Only one cyclone has made landfall to date, but Andrew Watkins, manager of BoM's Climate Prediction Services, says northern cyclone activity tends to peak in February-March.

La Nina is expected to persist at least until then, with some models putting her demise well into autumn. Normally the event begans to falter in December-January.

In a reverse of the El Nino phenomenon, conditions for La Nina occur when Australia's northern seas are warm, and the eastern Pacific is cool, creating a convection current that streams moist Pacific air over eastern Australia.

La Nina's persistence can be gauged by sub-surface temperatures in the eastern Pacific Ocean, Dr Watkins said. Unlike surface temperatures, which can change relatively quickly, sub-surface temperatures act like a climatic flywheel. Slow to shift to a new temperature, they are also slow to shift back.

Queensland may have had enough of La Nina, but the conditions that generated the event are also contributing to a mirror cycle in the Indian Ocean that has streamed moist air from north-western Australia down to the south-east.

Without that rainfall—albeit often badly timed for farmers—south-eastern Australia might be enduring an extension of its long-running drought, Dr Watkins said.

While the Indian and Pacific oceans have been contributing moisture to the Australian landmass, the all-important Southern Annular Mode (SAM) is in retreat.

SAM describes how the fronts blown around Antarctica shift north and south with the seasons. In winter, SAM moves further north, so the fronts typically contribute winter rainfall to southern Australia's Mediterranean climate. In summer, SAM moves south, and the rain falls out to sea.

SAM has been in an extended positive phase, and its rain-bearing fronts are not making landfall.

For south-west Western Australia, this has contributed to a record-breaking dry spell. South-eastern Australia has been watered largely by events that began in the Indian Ocean.

What is unclear is whether SAM will return to contributing good winter rainfall to southern Australia after La Nina breaks down, when the BoM's models forecast a spell of neutral conditions.

As Dr Watkins explained, "neutral" conditions—when climate isn't pushing strongly toward a dry or wet phase—doesn't necessarily mean "just right" for farmers, especially in southern Australia.

Modelling climate under global warming shows that higher ocean temperatures take SAM further south, so winter fronts make less landfall.

It remains to be determined whether the dryness of southern Australia over the past decade or so is an early harbinger of this phenomenon, or just a phase. Dr Watkins believes that a new "normal" is in the making.

"For much of southern and eastern Australia, the average has become slightly less rain in autumn and winter—we saw that in 2010 for much of the Murray-Darling Basin. It's a little harder to put your finger on 'average' these days."

The BoM is pretty happy with its forecasting leading up to the current La Nina, which it began calling as a strong possibility in June 2010.

In August, the BoM's seasonal outlook for September-November was relatively mild, with only modest chances of exceeding average rainfall in eastern Australia and south-west.

A month later, in its October-December forecast, BoM was predicting a very different picture. It suggested that Central Queensland had a 75 per cent chance of above-average rainfall—a forecast that led to briefings with the Queensland Government on flood preparedness.

BoM's January-March outlook suggests a reprieve from rain for most of Queensland, except the extreme south-east.

This area, with northern and eastern NSW, and the Pilbara region of WA, are predicted to have a 65-70 per cent chance of above-average rainfall as La Nina presumably enters its final phase.

* The Victorian DPI has put together some concise animations of the "climate dogs" that drive weather in Australia's south-east. The clips can be viewed here.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

RELATED COVERAGE

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
THE DENIERS HAVE WON

As a former climate change believer, may I personally apologize for condemning billions of children to death by CO2 for 25 years, “just” to get them to turn the lights out more often?

I had become the fear mongering neocon of CO2 environMENTALism as I issued CO2 death warrants to YOUR family and mine. I apologize for calling cold -warm, warm -hot and for calling all bad weather -Humanity’s fault.

I apologize for splitting responsible environmentalism and dragging progressivism down with it. I apologize for trying to control climates of a planet instead striving to achieve the needed population control.

I apologize for our constant demonizing, fear mongering, our utter hate for humanity and our whacko exaggerations of climate change.

I apologize for not admitting that Climate Change was the END OF THE WORLD, as in “unstoppable warming” and “out of control warming and “runaway warming“. I’m sorry I forgot this MOST important fact: that it was the trusted scientists and their evil chemicals that made environmentalism necessary in the first place.

Posted by mememine69, 10/01/2011 6:45:35 AM
I can tell you that 2012 will be below average rainfall: I can't tell you how much below average it will be.

Every year ending with a 2 since 1892 has been below average rainfall. Sometimes it has been well below average like 1902 and 2002 and sometimes it has been only just below average like 1942.

But in 120 years of records there has never been a year ending with a 2, that has had average or above average rainfall.

Posted by Qlander, 10/01/2011 8:48:26 AM
Qman, I'll bet you also wave a cork on a fishing line over your pregnant livestock, to determine the sex of the unborn. Great system eh? It will never let you down!

Who needs science and other high-falutin gibberish when we have our own ways of foretelling the future. As a matter of interest, what do your arthritic pains tell you to do today? Plow, sow, sleep, buy, sell, go to the pub, whinge?

Posted by Bushie Bill, 10/01/2011 9:16:20 AM
Watch the sun - the quieter it is the colder and wetter it gets. Watch the pacific decadel oscillation - 20-30 years of cold wet. Both known natural climate patterns that the BOM seems to ignore.
Posted by twawki, 10/01/2011 9:19:48 AM
mememine69, anyone who really cares about humanity will look at the science of climate change properly & continue to demand action. If you understood you would not become a denier in the face of a bit of rain & snow. If you do not have 'utter hate for humanity' you will reconsider!
Posted by Cow Cocky, 10/01/2011 10:03:14 AM
It was only 3 years ago that I had to sit patiently while a bunch of DNRM "experts" claimed there wouldn't be any major rainfall events in SEQ for 30 years. That prediction was based on their standard Climate Muddle.

And just a few months back the same Climate Muddle was belatedly predicting the direct opposite from exactly the same inputs. And none of these clowns has lost his job for their role in the SEQ water grid fiasco.

But one thing it did make absolutely clear was the fact that SEQ Labor is quite willing to build useless dams for their own use but won't lift a finger to build one for farmers that would actually pay its way. And now they have the gall to ponce about with fake concern for the welfare of flooded out communities when we all know damned well that none of this would be anywhere near as serious if regional Queensland had enjoyed its own government for the past 20 years. This is a 100% metro Qld disaster and any assistance they provide for the recovery is peanuts compared to what they have denied the regions over two lost decades.

Posted by Ian Mott, 10/01/2011 10:12:39 AM
Prince Motley still carrying about setting up his own little principality eh? You can just imagine it, can't you? Motty with his crown, perched regally on his head, robes aflutter in the aircon, sitting comfortably and confidently on his thrown (provided gratefully by the remnants of the Queensland Nationals), directing his serfs to be off to Timor and bring back slaves to run the Grand Principality of Mottsville's arid acres, at near zero cost; issuing passports and visas, at exorbitant fees, to visit and experience the great wondrous achievements of the brave new state; flogging Chinese-made souvenirs from the principality's overpriced gift shop, and if you visit Mott Cafe, baking you some of those wonderful pumpkin scones that dear old Lady Flo create all those many years ago; issuing invitations to royalty and world leaders to join him for a little kangaroo and wild pig hunting, and later hosting them to grand banquets of bandicoot and old rams, all the time singing the praises of a wonderful democratic system where the agrarian class rules (ALWAYS in the best interest of ALL citizens of the principality, of course) and dreams up new ways to tax the peasants. Dream on Motley.
Posted by Bushie Bill, 10/01/2011 12:57:02 PM
I reckon Qlanders theory is probably no more or less accurate than the crystal ball gazing that seems to eminate from the very well paid professionals around the place, at least Qlanders predictions are most likely based on real events. (its been similar here, the 2's are always crook). Geez, you must be one unhappy camper BB!
Posted by mark2, 10/01/2011 12:58:12 PM
This much bile usually means I was right on the money.

The real tragedy is that there isn't even a need for governments to build dams. Farmers could build their own off-stream turkey nest dams and do it a whole lot cheaper than government boofheads could manage on a perfect site. But the green/left future retardants have made it impossible to even build a bunded paddock.

So they manufacture a problem through their own incompetence and negligence. And then they ponce about grabbing maximum exposure for their fake concern and their compensatory trinkets.

Posted by Ian Mott, 10/01/2011 3:30:15 PM
Bushie Bill; I think you should reread my post, and then reread your post and offer an apology.

I simply made a very conservative prediction, based on a consistent pattern in 120 years of official records.

Exactly what is your problem with that?

I could make you up a computer model showing the pattern, if that will help.

Posted by Qlander, 10/01/2011 5:48:21 PM
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
POLL
Q: Do you think the Murray-Darling Basin Plan should be delayed following the floods?

Yes
(65.6%)

No
(28.9%)

Don't care
(5.6%)

Total Votes: 558
Poll Date: 06 January, 2011

Most popular articles

Advertisement



The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...