News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Water buyback can't wait: Wong 

Water buyback can't wait: Wong

07 Oct, 2009 10:38 AM
Federal Climate Change and Water Minister Penny Wong said the government did not have the luxury of waiting until a plan for future water use in the Murray-Darling Basin was finalised before starting to spend $3.1 billion buying water rights from farmers.

The Australian Financial Review has reported that the Productivity Commission said in a recent issues paper that because the government was buying water before the plan was finalised in 2011, there was a risk that it could "end up purchasing the wrong amount or distribution of entitlements".

But Senator Wong said it would be irresponsible for the government to wait until then to reduce water use in the Murray-Darling, as scientific research had shown repeatedly that the river system was in poor health.

"If we were starting this 10 years ago, you might have your plan and then you might work to it. But we don't have that luxury; we have to act now," she said.

"We don't apologise for purchasing water for the Murray-Darling Basin. It is the quickest way to assist in restoring the health of the Murray."

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size


comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Urgency is one of the most common defenses offered by decision makers who lack the knowledge, experience and foresight to meet the challenges they face. But what if the urgent action makes the situation worse? Premature action is rarely a good idea. A doctor who starts using the knife without a good grasp of the real causes of a patient's health can't really offer urgency as an excuse when the patient dies. A builder who starts building a house without proper plans can't really be taken seriously if urgency is the excuse provided when the house falls down. The Canberra bureaucrats managing the water buy-back are actively damaging the efficiency of the nation's major irrigation systems. In some situations they are taking water from rivers that should stay in the rivers. If they were buying water rights and tearing them up Ms Wong's argument could possibly be justified. Unfortunately they are not. They are merely transferring the ownership. The ill-conceived water market that enables them to buy a megalitre of water upstream and then transfer it downstream (without any deductions for losses due to evaporation, leakage, or consumption) further exacerbates over allocation.
Posted by Bill Williams, 7/10/2009 7:53:56 PM
The Darling River Action Group fully supports Penny Wong's view. And plenty of irrigators have realised the present level of extractions is unsustainable.
Posted by Barney, 8/10/2009 8:35:18 AM
To purchase the right to use water from a source high in a catchment and then to transfer that exact amount to be extracted from the same system further down actually INCREASES the total water extractive load on the catchment. It fails to take into account leakage and evaporation in the system as water travels down the river system. The short term quick fix is to improve the efficiency of irrigation and water distribution systems in the lower reaches of the catchment. This can be done quickly and is a permanent saving. It does not preclude other longer term options. Relocating water licences using taxpayer money to buy water licences from farmers high in the catchment and transfering them to urban use low in the catchment is very counter productive and wasteful of resources.
Posted by feathers, 8/10/2009 10:13:41 AM
When will people learn that buying allocation water that is only available when it has rained and is in the dam is crazy because when it has rained the water won't be needed. It would be far better to take away all high flow pumping and water harvesting rights as this is the water that comes into the river systems with the volume and power to flow right to the rivers end and flush the system.
Posted by Jim Gunn, 9/10/2009 10:50:17 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Water Minister Senator Penny Wong
Water Minister Senator Penny Wong
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
POLL
Q: Should the Liberal Party follow Malcolm Turnbull's lead and push for amendments to Labor's emissions trading scheme (ETS)?

Yes - an amended ETS is needed
(39.7%)

No - they should flatly oppose the ETS
(51.9%)

Other
(8.5%)

Total Votes: 567
Poll Date: 04 October, 2009
BLOGS
30 September, 2009

Most popular articles

ELDERS NEWS MREC FW



 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...