News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Time to plan: Era of cheap food over 

Time to plan: Era of cheap food over

05 Oct, 2009 05:42 AM
A DIVERSE coalition of community organisations says the era of cheap, accessible fresh food may be almost over, and that integrated planning is needed to ensure future supply.

The Sydney Food Fairness Alliance coalesced around a number of issues that affect the city's food security, including the drought, climate change, population growth, urban encroachment on agricultural land and concerns about the health impact and embedded costs of industrially produced food.

One suggestion is the creation of a state-level ministry of food which would have oversight of all relevant food production, supply and distribution issues.

The alliance, founded in 2006, will host a summit on October 22 and 23, called Hungry for Change, at which it plans to weave together these concerns into a food charter that might form the basis of future government policy.

"It has been left for a long time to market forces, and the food system really requires much more long-term and integrated planning than has been there to date," said a summit organiser, Elizabeth Millen, of the South West Sydney Area Health Service.

Ms Millen also noted the huge public costs of diet-related problems such as type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease.

London, Vancouver and New York have adopted food policies in the past two years, and Toronto has had one for 10 years.

"We can't grow all our food locally: those 100-mile diets and so on are interesting experiments but they're not replicable in the city," said Russ Grayson, vice-president of the alliance, which includes health workers and nutritionists, researchers, local government, environmentalists, chefs, permaculture advocates and social justice groups from churches.

"But it's obviously sensible to have as much as we can grown locally … especially for a city coming up to 6 million by 2025."

Part of the summit's aim is to highlight grassroots steps already being taken around Sydney, such as backyard and communal gardens and "community-supported agriculture", where a group of city residents subscribe for a weekly box of produce from a small group of farmers.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Has anyone told our supermarkets all this mumbo jumbo? They control and manipulate our food prices and the farm gate prices. If you believe all this food stuff you're wrong. I've been on the recieving end of supermarket chains and I know what they do. They are powerful monopolies.
Posted by pete, 5/10/2009 10:48:38 AM
Consumer food (especially fresh food) prices really do not need to change, however for Australia to have successful, safe, reliable and clean food supplies the distribution of earnings from food production needs to be evened out. Major supermarkets=mass profits. World market=mass depreciation. Farmers=break even sometimes. Doesn't add up does it? Before hoisting prices at the consumer level, have a look at the value adding throughout the food production processes...
Posted by Rebecca Dance, 6/10/2009 7:32:59 AM
One of the main concerns is to ensure the Australian farmers, especially the family farms, get a fair price for their product so that they continue to exist. Otherwise the only farms we will have will be large scale multi nationals who will produce whatever they need to fill world markets at the greatest profits and have little concern for the precise needs of the local population. Then we will be left with whatever imports are available and with no controls over food safety issues.
Posted by Cynical farmer, 6/10/2009 7:33:51 AM
Before you go suggesting a state ministry of food to control production have a look at China (and every other communist country) and see how spectacularly their centrally controlled agricultural systems failed.
Posted by bec, 6/10/2009 8:28:14 AM
Bec, what century you've been living in? China is exporting more and more of their ag products to Australia these days and about to take over the major fertiliser manufacturer in Oz. Give existing system a few more years and you'll find all food on your table comes from that "communist failure" and our farmers are going on the doll.
Posted by Andrew, 6/10/2009 10:32:22 AM
I can see cattle and sheep grazing in those community gardens as we speak! I totally agree with "Cynical Farmer". The international market is not an even playing field and we need to look after our farmers.
Posted by AW, 6/10/2009 10:37:29 AM
Obviously we need to look at history and reject or change the parts that aren't working now and do not change for change's sake. As a retired farmer I know farmers are VERY efficient or they don't survive. John Howard tried to push the efficiencies further along the chain. Socialists got rid of him. Who finances socialists and what is their agenda? The definition of a fool is someone who has said in his core belief "there is no God". As a society we want the benefits of the Kingdom of God but we reject his word, light, truth and King, Jesus the Christ or annointed one, and as a result we whinge about the benefits of serving king Lucifer who comes to rob, kill and destroy. The answer is sooo simple. Blessed is the nation whose God is the Lord. Jesus is Lord to the Glory of God the Father. So think carefully who you chose to serve for it is your life and the life of those you love at stake.
Posted by Richie 10, 6/10/2009 10:47:08 AM
It is interesting isn't it. While the supply of food greatly exceeded demand and prices were ridiculously cheap, it was all "let the free market rein". As soon as things move the other way and the price of food looks like going up, it's "Omygod we will have to regulate".
Posted by Qlander, 6/10/2009 10:48:30 AM
Ok Let's start from the top - which is the bottom - our soils's investment into food production. This is given to us by planet Earth for nothing - that's how all life on earth has been underwritten. Our job is too renew and replenish these soils where ever possible and NOT SQUANDER them on producing food that is not healthy for us, that is part of the trillions of tons of food that is thrown out each year or that is just empty 'filler' for our stomachs. So let's move to cost of food production. All food that is wasted (including foods that fuel obesity) adds to the cost of the food that is needed. All food that requires multiple energy efforts at farm level will cost more. All food production that is totally vulnerable to drought/flood/disease/pests adds to the costs of those foods that get through these natural events to end up in a packet, at your grocers. All food that requires multiple post-farm processing including all health safety protocols, chill management, dessication mangement, packaging, transport and all the hundreds of hands involved from harvest to purchase will cost more - and too often deliver less nourishment than the original raw product. So by raw save money.
Posted by deb, 6/10/2009 11:05:42 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
02 October, 2009
01 October, 2009
02 October, 2009
POLL
Q: Should the Liberal Party follow Malcolm Turnbull's lead and push for amendments to Labor's emissions trading scheme (ETS)?

Yes - an amended ETS is needed
(39.7%)

No - they should flatly oppose the ETS
(51.9%)

Other
(8.5%)

Total Votes: 567
Poll Date: 04 October, 2009

Most popular articles

Advertisement



The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...