News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Single-desk carbon trade could earn billions: Flannery 

Single-desk carbon trade could earn billions: Flannery

31 Jul, 2009 06:24 AM
THE former Australian of the year Tim Flannery has proposed a single Australian Government trading desk – similar to the former wheat desk – to sell carbon credits to the United States.

The government-operated desk could ensure Australia up to 10 per cent of the 1 billion tonnes of carbon offsets the US would buy offshore a year if legislation to establish a US emissions trading scheme passes the US Senate later this year, he said.

Mr Flannery backed the Coalition’s proposed amendment to the Government’s emissions trading scheme which would allow carbon credits to be created by farmers who store carbon in their soil. He said these would be the primary carbon credits sold to the US through his proposed trading desk.

Green carbon, such as biochar – a type of processed charcoal used to store carbon in soil – is not included in the Australian emissions trading scheme or any international agreements.

Under the Government’s proposed emissions trading scheme, Australian carbon credits can only be generated through revegetation of trees to avoid deforestation.

"The Government could then buy a certain amount of permits from farmers for carbon soil storage … at, say, $15 a tonne and sell them on to the US at $20 through the desk," Mr Flannery said. "If we could get 10 per cent of the US market at, say, $20 that would be about $2 billion a year coming into Australia and [would] help Australian farmers expand carbon storage projects."

Under the single-desk plan, government assessors would be sent to evaluate carbon storage to ensure they were legitimate projects before the Government could sell them. Mr Flannery’s proposal would require Australia to lift a temporary ban on selling carbon credits internationally – except to New Zealand – currently included in the emissions trading legislation before Parliament, and require green carbon’s inclusion in an international climate change agreement.

Mr Flannery recently returned from New Zealand where he proposed a similar idea to the country’s climate minister.

On Wednesday the Agriculture Minister, Tony Burke, cast doubt on the likelihood of biochar and other soil-based carbon storage being used to create permits in an Australian scheme.

Malcolm Turnbull, the Opposition Leader, said yesterday the Opposition would vote down the Government’s emissions trading scheme when it came to the vote in the Senate next month unless the Government accepted nine broad changes to the policy outlined last week, including the inclusion of biochar.

But speaking to the Sydney Morning Herald yesterday Mr Flannery hit out at the Liberal Party, saying the "rump" of climate sceptics in the party were marching it to electoral defeat based on a flawed climate-change policy.

"That is just stupid and they need to move on … Malcolm is trying to move them on, though not as effectively as we would like to see," Mr Flannery said. "How stupid could you be? They will lose at least 20 seats if there is a double-dissolution election."

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Here we go. The real reason behind the climate change hysteria - money.
Posted by Archibald, 31/07/2009 8:56:57 AM
What's this bloke think he is - a guru?
Posted by tigerdicky, 31/07/2009 9:06:55 AM
It is any financial benefit to carbon trading for farmers, the US will be giving it to their farmers. They have a long history of looking after their farmers, and there is no way they be spending their money on our farmers.
Posted by Qlander, 31/07/2009 9:50:10 AM
Follow the money trail. Those who push the ETS have sold their souls to the green devil - and ignore the cooling environment at the same time
Posted by Sam, 31/07/2009 1:00:19 PM
If we wheat producers weren't allowed to retain a single desk for wheat marketing, there shouldn't be one for carbon.
Posted by cannona, 31/07/2009 1:16:57 PM
Well, well, well! Ain't it marvellous! And, Sam, they haven't just sold their souls. They sold ours too. The universities call it socialism.
Posted by Ted O'Brien, 31/07/2009 3:00:36 PM
It has been said that: "Bipartisan is a way of political life in which too many mouths defend the decisions of too few minds until central opinion gives birth to corrupt & absolute power." With the labor-liberal bipartisan agreement to embody a hidden, carbon sin tax in the cost of goods & services now a fait accompli but for crossing the t's. Tim Flannery's proposal to centralise sin tax certificate trading in a single desk system will ensure corruption flourishes ie 'the fewer you have to bribe the greater the profits that will flow from the GW prophecy based, economic scam. Strange how leopards never change their spots nor serpents their stealthful ways.
Posted by jock, 1/08/2009 1:16:38 PM
Participating in such a scheme may pose significant risks for farmers. For example, farmers might be able to increase levels of soil carbon when crops and pastures grow when it rains. However, in times of drought levels of soil carbon generally declines. Would farmers have to pay for these losses? It's not all upside.
Posted by suzzie lee miketon, 1/08/2009 4:01:58 PM
Well that's what it's all about, the mighty yankee dollar, man made global warming of smart moneys bank accounts.
Posted by john, 3/08/2009 7:52:00 AM
It's just inspiring to see how many bloggers are getting the message. A system of carbon trading based on Kyoto Rules will decimate farmers and livestock producers. Increases in productivity are slow and hard won in agriculture. This can be seen in the declining terms of trade. Kyoto Rules are all about permanent transition to some other form of production. The only growth sector that will result from carbon trading will be those who administer and speculate in the market.
Posted by phil-_oc, 3/08/2009 8:49:43 AM
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Tim Flannery ... estimates benefit of $2 billion a year. Photo: Simone DePeak
Tim Flannery ... estimates benefit of $2 billion a year. Photo: Simone DePeak
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
30 July, 2009
29 July, 2009
POLL
Q: Has the Federal Government got the balance right between water buybacks and investment in more efficient irrigation infrastructure in the Murray Darling?

Yes
(3.8%)

No - there should be more investment in infrastructure
(73.8%)

No - there should be more emphasis on water buybacks
(13.7%)

Undecided
(8.7%)

Total Votes: 416
Poll Date: 26 July, 2009

Most popular articles

Advertisement



The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...