News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Senate slams failure to invest in Murray modernisaton 

Senate slams failure to invest in Murray modernisaton

02 Jul, 2009 05:00 AM
A SENATE committee investigating the long-term impacts of water management in the Murray-Darling Basin has attacked the Government for failing to invest in the modernisation and upgrades of irrigation infrastructure ahead of water buybacks.

A new report tabled by the committee, which comprised a majority of Coalition Senators, found that a higher priority needed to be placed on the "replumbing" of rural Australia through both on and off-farm infrastructure projects.

It has also called for an economic and social impact statement on the strategy guiding water buybacks.

Evidence to the inquiry included a telling statement from the CSIRO's Dr Tom Hatton who told the committee that the Government might get "better for your buck in the water purchase if you invest some of your financial resources into infrastructure".

Not surprisingly, Government Senators involved with the committee have written their own dissenting report, arguing the Government is on the right track to deliver major reforms and return large volumes of water to the environment after what they say were "years of inaction" by the previous Coalition Government.

The Greens, too, did not agree with the report and completed their own minority report which found the Government should not put off further water purchases for the environment, however called for the protection of agricultural lands for the purposes of food security.

The committee investigating the matter, chaired by Nationals Senator Fiona Nash, recommended "careful consideration" be given to the impact of the acceleration of the water buybacks when infrastructure projects had not been completed or even commenced.

It said the Government "must hasten both on-farm and off-farm infrastructure spending where it delivers water savings and increased environmental flows while enhancing both food security and the viability of regional communities".

It also called on the Federal and NSW Government to immediately sort out a secure water supply for Broken Hill and re-engineer Menindee Lakes to reduce evaporation.

It called for more work by State Governments to reduce urban reliance on the system, with calls for water recycling and desalination in Adelaide and a halt to the controversial North-South Pipeline in Victoria.

Labor Senators Glenn Sterle and Kerry O'Brien wrote that whilst some in the community would argue the pace of the Government's basin reforms was too slow, others – including some Opposition Senators – argue that the pace is too fast.

"Government Senators believe that the Australian Government has got the balance right," the Labor report reads.

"The Australian Government recognises the urgency of the current water crisis in the Basin, and does not believe that further delay on action such as investment in irrigation efficiency and infrastructure, and purchase of water from willing sellers, is warranted.

"…given that very little happened in the years prior to the Rudd Government to restore the balance between consumptive and environmental water needs and to address the threat of climate change, to delay action any further would be irresponsible."

They said, however, that the process of developing a new basin plan "cannot, and must not be rushed".

While Greens Senators said they agreed with many of the recommendations in the majority report they disagreed with the position on water buybacks.

"We cannot support putting off purchases of water when they become available," the Greens report said.

"We urge the Government to put more resources into community planning and not rely on the ad hoc patchwork process that is occurring in the basin at present."

The said food production and security remain vitally important issues, and a "strategic approach" was needed to ensure the most productive lands in agriculture were kept.

"At the same time we must face the reality of the fact that the system has been over-allocated and we will need to push on with improving the efficiency of our irrigation infrastructure and returning more water to the system to ensure our levels of water extraction are sustainable for the long term."

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1


RELATED COVERAGE

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Where is the logic in upgrading irrigation infrastructure on farms that will later sell their water licences to the Government?

Broken Hill already has a secure water supply - it is called Menindee Lakes. We have heard so much nonsense about evaporation from Menindee Lakes. Since 2002 the two largest lakes have been dry, and now only Lake Wetherell has water in it.

That lake is not only Broken Hill's water supply, but it is the supply for the lower Darling and one of the few remaning wetlands in the Darling basin.

What used to be called the Menindee Lakes has now moved upstream to the ring tanks of the cotton growers. Cubbie's dams for example are three quarters the size of Lake Menindee. If you want to look at evaporation losses, look at the losses from the enormous shallow ring tanks of the cotton growers.

The sooner they disappear the better.

Posted by Barney, 2/07/2009 11:47:32 AM
There is little point in just improving infrastructure on farms unless it can be clearly identified as a long term benefit.

Just look at the wastage of at least $8m in Govt. upgrading of the swamp irrigation blocks downstream from Murray Bridge. Most farmers there have sold their water and ceased irrigating.

Posted by Richard, 2/07/2009 2:51:19 PM
Agree with you entirely Barney, and when will the government read the research of Keith Potts, presented to them Feb 2008 entitled 'Aerosol Plumes The Cause of Droughts and El Nino Events By Regional Dimming"?

Ask the Indonesian government to put out the fires which are now burning in 15 meter deep peat. Go another step and offer assistance.

We are not the only country suffering because of these fires. The effect goes as far as East/central Africa. I'm getting bloody tired of trying to get this message about.

Posted by Will, 2/07/2009 6:01:45 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
POLL
Q: Has the 'ute-gate' fake email affair in Federal Parliament changed your voting intentions?

Yes - I am more likely to vote Liberal/National
(22.8%)

Yes - I am more likely to vote Labor
(10.9%)

Yes - I am less likely to vote for either major party
(11.3%)

No - it has not affected my voting position
(55%)

Total Votes: 906
Poll Date: 28 June, 2009

Most popular articles

Ray White Rural Northern Beef Week
 
MON0152
 
IRRIGATION CONFERENCE 2010
 
Photo Library
 
Rural Bookshop
 
Land Subscriptions
 
The Land Facebook


 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...