News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Scientist admits to Heartland Institute ruse 

Scientist admits to Heartland Institute ruse

22 Feb, 2012 07:25 AM
A PROMINENT scientist and author has admitted duping conservative US think tank The Heartland Institute into releasing sensitive documents about its budget and its payments to climate-change sceptics.

Peter Gleick, a widely published US scientist and water researcher, said he emailed a staff member at the institute pretending to be someone else and was sent a set of eight documents that included the names of hundreds of companies that had donated to the institute, details of the group's strategies and a list of payments to bloggers and scientists, including an Australian, James Cook University adjunct professor Bob Carter.

Dr Gleick published a statement on the internet yesterday apologising for obtaining the documents by deceptive means. He claimed to have been sent an anonymous memo apparently outlining the institute's strategy. Heartland has subsequently claimed the memo was fake.

After receiving the memo, Dr Gleick says he tried to verify it. ''In an effort to do so, and in a serious lapse of my own and professional judgment and ethics, I solicited and received additional materials directly from The Heartland Institute under someone else's name,'' he said in his statement.

''The materials The Heartland Institute sent me confirmed many of the facts in the original document, including, especially, their 2012 fund-raising strategy and budget … I made no changes or alterations of any kind to any of the Heartland Institute documents or to the original anonymous communication.''

Dr Gleick's statement was issued after the institute had already described him as ''a true enemy'' and ''a committed alarmist rent seeker'' who was a prime suspect in their investigation.

The disclosure of the confidential information, which first appeared online last Wednesday and was reported in the following day's Herald, proved acutely embarrassing for the institute, which publicly apologised to the donors, to whom it had promised anonymity. Several donor companies, including Microsoft, issued apologies of their own.

The strategy documents obtained by Dr Gleick showed millions of dollars being spent on a range of projects designed to create uncertainty about climate science in schools, newspapers, on television and the internet.

A senior Australian scientist, David Karoly of the University of Melbourne, wrote to the institute with other leading climate researchers on Friday asking it to stop attacking climate scientists.

''Whether Peter Gleick's actions were justified … I cannot say,'' Professor Karoly told the Herald. ''My view is that the information about the funding used by The Heartland Institute should be out and available to the public.''

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

RELATED COVERAGE

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
So much for left wing ethics.

It will be very interesting to see if the good Dr is fired by the Pacific Institute and disowned by his fellow-travelers in the environmental and NGO movements.

I am not holding my breath.

I would also expect that the left wing version of free speech will visit all sorts of grubby pay-back on those organisations who had the temerity to contribute to Heartland.

Posted by Dexter, 22/02/2012 8:30:52 AM
Better get a lawyer son, better get a real good one.
Posted by Loc Hey, 22/02/2012 9:58:56 AM
Poor old Gleicky, damned by his own words, pwned by himself:

Well back in 2006:

"Gleick opened the forum by describing the many ways in which the scientific process can be abused, including attacks on scientists, falsifying or suppressing research data, manipulating reporting of scientific research and bullying scientists by threatening their professional status, funding or research."

http://www.gazettetimes.com/news/local/scientists-debate-censorship-of-data/article_f38e0dac-5cbf-5ea7-ac58-eb466772b5e7.html

Posted by Bill Pounder, 22/02/2012 10:19:36 AM
Notice how Cubby only ran Gleicks side of the story as to whether documents were altered. Did he bother to ask the Heartland Institute if they thought the so-called strategy document had been altered? No.

And did he bother to contact Bob Carter as a logical counterpoint to David Karoly? No.

Same old Cubby unprofessional climate retard MO.

Posted by Ian Mott, 22/02/2012 10:58:24 AM
"Gleick claims he committed this crime because he believed The Heartland Institute was preventing a “rational debate” from taking place over global warming... Heartland has repeatedly asked for real debate on this important topic. Gleick himself was specifically invited to attend a Heartland event to debate global warming just days before he stole the documents. He turned down the invitation. "

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/02/20/statement-by-the-heartland-institute-on-gleick-confession/

Posted by Bill Pounder, 22/02/2012 11:46:07 AM
Just the tip off the iceberg and far as funding climate change sceptics.

Energy companies have billions to throw around to confuse guliable brain dead people, that the science is wrong on climate change.

Money well spent in this forum!!!

Posted by holisticmick, 22/02/2012 12:27:47 PM
It appears, according to the left-wingers, that forging documents, identity theft and wrongful assertions against individuals and corporation are victimless crimes. Whatever happened to the left’s self-proclaimed moral superiority in victim support advocacy.

Knock…….knock Mr Cubby…………is anybody home, or did you leave the lights on purposefully ??

Posted by PAYG, 22/02/2012 1:05:35 PM
HM how much have Govt spent in funding to try to prove a link between C02 and runaway global warming ? 100 billon ? And have not proved anything, all the evidence proves no case to answer that C02 is doing anything dangerous at all. Just feeding the plant life and has a mild logrithermic warming effect on the atmosphere. Look in the mirror if you are looking for the biggest of the gullible brain dead idiots. The facts are now clear HM, except to the brain dead, your version of the climate change science is frisby spin science that has no empirical evidence to back it up at all.
Posted by Loc Hey, 22/02/2012 1:19:01 PM
Get up to speed, Loc Hey, here's the connection you're looking for:

http://www.woodfortrees.org/plot/esrl-co2/from:1982.25/offset:-343/plot/esrl-co2/from:1982.25/to:1997.25/trend/offset:-343/plot/rss/from:1997.25/scale:75/plot/rss/from:1997.25/trend/scale:75/plot/esrl-co2/from:1997.25/trend/offset:-343

Whoops! once again THERE"S NO CONNECTION. What are we going to do? Arck, arck, the sky is falling! (repeat )

Posted by Bill Pounder, 22/02/2012 1:52:17 PM
The leaking of Heartland documents raises several questions. Pott of course harrumphs that they were faked, but Heartland in a prepared statement on February 15 confirmed that they had been emailed in error, and just one of them had been altered.

Most of the comments I have seen from scientists condemn Peter Gleick, but note that he did accept responsibility. Can we expect a similar confession from the hacker who stole emails from UEA?

And (Dexter) in what way is the leaking of documents "left-wing"? Possibly criminal ... thought I don"t know what law was broken.

Posted by nico, 22/02/2012 1:53:21 PM
1 | 2 | 3 | 4  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Dr Gleick published a statement on the internet yesterday apologising for obtaining the documents by deceptive means.
"Dr Gleick published a statement on the internet yesterday apologising for obtaining the documents by deceptive means".
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
POLL
Q: Who is your preferred Prime Minister?

Julia Gillard
(5.5%)

Kevin Rudd
(7.8%)

Tony Abbott
(30.9%)

Malcolm Turnbull
(25.2%)

Warren Truss
(2.3%)

Barnaby Joyce
(7.4%)

Bob Katter
(7.2%)

Yourself
(9.3%)

Other
(4.4%)

Total Votes: 1371
Poll Date: 20 February, 2012

Most popular articles

Advertisement



The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...