News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Rural MPs livid Rudd can 'do nothing more' on fuel, food prices 

Rural MPs livid Rudd can 'do nothing more' on fuel, food prices

23 May, 2008 03:17 PM
Prime Minister Kevin Rudd has effectively breached an implied election promise that he would bring down rising fuel and grocery prices.

"We have done as much as we physically can to provide additional help to the family budget, recognising that the cost of everything is still going through the roof, the cost of food, cost of petrol, cost of rents, cost of childcare," Mr Rudd said in Adelaide yesterday.

The statement has angered rural MPs, with Nationals Leader Warren Truss accusing Mr Rudd of throwing in the towell after just six months in the job.

"I was astonished to see that less than six months after he assumed the job of running Australia, Mr Rudd now believes there is nothing more he can do," Mr Truss said.

"This astonishing admission comes only days after Mr Rudd stated that his dreadful first Budget would lead to a 'modest increase' in unemployment.

Mr Truss has written to Mr Rudd with a list of suggestions of what more can be done by the government to ease price pressures in those areas.

"Firstly, follow the Coalition's decisive lead and cut fuel excise by five cents a litre," Mr Truss said.

"Labor has a dreadful record on fuel excise – driving it up 500pc between 1983 and 1996 – but cutting it now will be a relief for household budgets as petrol prices go through the roof.

"Secondly, Labor should dump its plans to increase diesel fuel excise and registration charges for heavy vehicles.

"The Government has admitted these rises will flow straight through to consumers and drive up grocery prices for all families.

"Thirdly, halt the inflationary Budget tax binge that will send up the price of working people's Friday drinks, cars, private health insurance and energy."

Independent MP for the seat of New England, Tony Windsor, says that in theory the government has the capacity to cut more than 50c/litre worth of taxes off the current petrol price.

"In 2006 with reports indicating petrol prices could rise to over $2 per litre, I called on the Government of the day to review the tax system on petrol so rather than looking at how much money could be raised from petrol, how it could stimulate the economy," Mr Windsor said.

"Back then, the Government continued to say it could do nothing to stop it. It was incorrect then and it is incorrect now."

Mr Windsor explained that the Government adds an excise (tax) of 38c/l which raises about $13 billion per year. Of this approximately $2B or 15pc finds its way back onto our roads with the rest going to consolidated revenue for other purposes.

Add to that the GST which is about 15c/l and it means that more than 50c/l is currently Australian tax and has nothing to do with global oil prices.

Mr Windsor says that the government has the capacity - in theory at least - to reduce the petrol prices from $1.60 to $1.10/l but says the government does not appear to have the will.

Mr Windsor is calling for the Government to expand its review of the Australian Taxation system to now include the GST.

"Country people pay more for their petrol with additional freight costs and then pay GST on top of that extra amount too," he said.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Kevin Rudd claimed in the lead up to the election that he was an economic conservative.

If he is as economically conservative as his predecessor, there is no way he will reduce either excise or GST.

The entire rural industry as a block can front up at the bankruptcy court and he will not shift his position one iota.

Posted by Trugger, 24/05/2008 5:38:14 AM
The worst thing Rudd can do is cut the excise; instead why doesn't he allocate that portion towards alternative sources of fuels?

Simply cutting it only puts off the inevitable, increasingly high fuel prices.

Govt needs to look for solutions not band-aids.

That money could help drive research into second generation ethanol production from Australian specific sources.

It could also work to build a CNG or extensive LPG gas network across Australia.

Let's be smart and forward looking, wasn't that the point of the 2020 summit??

All I see is govt failure and a lack of willingness.

How about developing the WA Pilbira to become our food bowl, unlimited water there.

Let's be the smart country again, not the short-cut nation.

Posted by Don't cut but re-allocate, 26/05/2008 11:05:47 AM
What a defeatest attitude.

Rudd's a dud when he has nobody to make suggestions to which he can reply "me too".

You have been there six months now Kev and have done nothing, apart from tripping around the world, so hadn't you better get your act into gear?

Posted by macca, 26/05/2008 8:14:42 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
POLL
Q: How do rate this year's Federal Budget offerings for rural and regional Australia?

Excellent
(1.3%)

Good
(2.8%)

Average
(9.5%)

Poor
(37.7%)

Terrible
(48.7%)

Total Votes: 316
Poll Date: 18 May, 2008

Most popular articles

ELDERS NEWS MREC FW



The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...