News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Push for emission loophole alleged 

Push for emission loophole alleged

09 Dec, 2009 05:49 AM
AUSTRALIA and other industrialised countries have been accused of pushing for the introduction of a loophole in greenhouse accounting that would ''hide'' millions of tonnes of emissions released during plantation and other forestry.

Rule changes for measuring forestry emissions proposed at the Copenhagen climate summit are estimated to allow wealthy nations to release an extra 236 million tonnes of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere from burning fossil fuels while still meeting their emissions reduction targets.

The shift involves changing the baseline year against which current emissions are measured. By using a higher baseline figure - a prediction of average annual future forestry emissions - they can emit more while still meeting their target.

Sean Cadman, a forest and climate consultant working for the Wilderness Society, said the wealthy were trying to ''disappear'' huge real emissions from greenhouse gas accounts by manufacturing a false baseline. It meant Australian could emit an extra 6 per cent of emissions based on 1990 levels while still meeting its target.

''This would weaken the effort that is required to reduce emissions from fossil fuel use and the land sector,'' Mr Cadman said. ''The critical thing is these are policy choices - Australia could instead protect native forests and have a real saving of emissions.''

He said the world only knew the impact of the proposed changes because the G77 bloc of developing countries had demanded data be released.

''Hopefully now we have the opportunity to have this particular loophole closed,'' he said.

Environmentalists said the loophole was another example of Australia fighting for treatment of forestry emissions that minimised the effort it had to make to meet a target.

Under the Kyoto Protocol the so-called ''Australia clause'' allowed Canberra to earn credits for the massive drop in emissions from land-clearing after 1990.

It means it may meet its Kyoto target of an 8 per cent increase in emissions between 1990 and 2012 despite fossil fuels emissions increasing by about 30 per cent.

Australian Conservation Foundation climate change campaigner Tony Mohr said Australia's position on land and forestry emissions was under scrutiny.

''The Australian Government needs to make a clear commitment that they won't try and get a last-minute fiddle on the rules that gives us a free kick on land-use emissions,'' he said.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
This is hypocritical and is designed to keep poor countries poor and starving! Not very Christian but then again I guess climate change believers are that full of themselves they do not believe in God and His Almighty power anyway!
Posted by Common Cents, 10/12/2009 8:47:34 AM
What a croc of proverbial from the greens. As a past member of the AGO's consultative panel on Land Use Change & Forestry I can confirm that the IPCC accounting methodology for forest and landscape carbon is in need of very drastic reform. It doesn't even recognise the fact that the wood in your house and your fence posts still has its carbon intact. And it was the green movement that corrupted this methodology in the first place to pretend that this carbon, and the carbon in my 80 year old tree stumps, has already been released. And it was the greens who manipulated the system so the carbon released from Japanese newsprint was measured as an Australian emission. And it is the green movement who now cry foul when partial reforms might make life a little easier for Australian families. The fact is that the whole IPCC framework is riven with fraud, corruption and, indeed, treason. The world needs to start again from scratch to ensure that all relevant principles of fairness, equity and data integrity are applied.
Posted by Ian Mott, 10/12/2009 9:23:09 AM
This whole carbon dioxide vilification is a vehicle to bring in control over people and their lives. Not one bit to do with good of the planet.
Posted by Len, 10/12/2009 10:51:54 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
07 December, 2009
08 December, 2009
POLL
Q: Which do you think is the best method for reducing Australia's carbon emissions?

Emissions Trading Scheme
(8.7%)

Carbon Tax
(11.7%)

Laws regulating behaviour
(7.7%)

Direct Govt investment in renewable energy
(42.9%)

Direct Govt payments for emissions reductions
(5.2%)

None of the above
(23.8%)

Total Votes: 762
Poll Date: 06 December, 2009

Most popular articles

Advertisement



The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...