News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 NSW hits out at water buybacks 

NSW hits out at water buybacks

13 Mar, 2009 07:19 PM
The NSW Farmers’ Association has expressed its concern over the Murray Darling Basin water buyback proposal and its potential negative impact on NSW.

President Jock Laurie says the association is particularly concerned about the implications of the buybacks on the future of irrigation in NSW.

“The Commonwealth will purchase $1.9 billion of water from the Murray Darling Basin over the next four years,” Mr Laurie said.

"This includes the $500 million that was brought forward as a result of negotiations around the economic stimulus package

“Our concern is that these buybacks will not be spread equitably across the four states in the Murray Darling Basin.

"So NSW will be burdened with the majority of water purchases.

“Victoria has protected its irrigators from the buyback by installing a 10pc cap on the amount of water that can be traded out of the State.”

This barrier to trade was negotiated by Victoria under the inter-governmental agreement on Murray Darling Basin Reform.

“The 10pc cap restricts the trade of water from Victoria, which, as a result, is likely to see the majority of water purchases coming from NSW,” Mr Laurie said.

The association is calling for a stop to the water buyback process until a level playing field can be established between Victoria, South Australia, Queensland and NSW.

“The sale of water out of irrigation systems has flow on effects to the remaining farmers and agricultural communities,” Mr Laurie said.

“For example, consideration must be given to the long-term viability of shared infrastructure when irrigators sell their water and no longer contribute to maintenance costs.

“Similarly, small businesses, towns and indeed entire communities that depend on the flow-on from irrigation are potentially threatened by the buyback process.”

According to Mr Laurie, while removing trade barriers doesn’t remove the threat to irrigators and communities, it spreads the risk.

“The Federal Government needs to recognise that the buybacks have the potential to decimate rural communities,” Mr Laurie said.

"It is essential that a plan be in place to determine where water is going to be purchased, and how it is to be used, so that the impacts can be spread evenly across the states.

“The association has opposed the water buybacks under these conditions and the association will continue to work to ensure the NSW irrigation industry is treated in a fair manner."

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


No comments yet. Be the first to comment below.

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Jock Laurie: “The Federal Government needs to recognise that the water buybacks have the potential to decimate rural communities.”
Jock Laurie: “The Federal Government needs to recognise that the water buybacks have the potential to decimate rural communities.”
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
11 March, 2009
13 March, 2009
POLL
Q: Do you support SA Premier Mike Rann's High Court challenge to force the removal of water trading caps in the Murray Darling Basin?

Yes
(41.6%)

No
(47.1%)

Undecided
(11.2%)

Total Votes: 490
Poll Date: 08 March, 2009

Most popular articles

Advertisement



The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...