News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Noxious weed sold as 'waterwise' 

Noxious weed sold as 'waterwise'

22 Jan, 2009 06:15 AM
A weed blamed for destroying pasture and choking wetlands in the Murray-Darling is being mistakenly sold as a waterwise no-mow lawn.

The lippia species Phyla canescens from Argentina has invaded more than 5 million hectares of the Murray-Darling Basin, but the NSW Government has resisted calls to ban the weed and its less invasive cousin, Phyla nodiflora.

Described by the botanist Matt Macdonald, who did his doctorate on it, as the worst weed west of the Great Divide, Phyla canescens is often wrongly labelled as Phyla nodiflora and sold in nurseries, according to a new manual published online by the National Lippia Working Group.

Sydney Water gives Phyla nodiflora - the less invasive of the two species - the best waterwise rating on its plant selector web pages, and says it is suitable for planting across large areas of the city and the Illawarra.

But Dr Macdonald found the falsely labelled weed at stores and nurseries in NSW and Victoria while working on his PhD at the University of New England last year. He found more on sale in a Perth nursery last week.

He said he had never seen genuine Phyla nodiflora on sale.

The two lippia species were very difficult to distinguish and both should be banned, he said.

"If you haven't looked closely at them, they can be hard to tell apart. Even I have to umm and ahh about some of them."

The Moree cattle grazier Bruce Southeron, who reckons he has lost more than $2million in income over the past decade, also wants both species banned.

In his 30 years on his 4450-hectare property, Old Dromana, 70kilometres west of Moree, he has watched lippia form a knotty killing mat over his paddocks, forcing a reduction in his stock from 2500 to 1500 head of cattle.

Where 1000 breeding cows once ran, only 600 can now thrive, cutting the number of calves he can sell by 400 - a loss of $200,000 in income each year.

The precious publicly owned Macquarie Marshes are also being progressively strangled by the weed, which costs an estimated $1.8billion a year in environmental losses such as erosion.

Mr Southeron described his decades-long quest to get state and federal governments to take action as "heartbreaking."

In November 2007 the NSW Legislative Council's standing committee on state development called on the Government to prohibit "the sale or propagation of lippia in all areas of NSW".

In its response last May, the Government said prohibition "is currently not considered the best way to manage the problems associated with this plant" which was already widespread and had gained popularity as a lawn cover during drought.

"Actions to control lippia throughout all of NSW would require a major redirection of local government resources and be prohibitively expensive," the Government's response said.

However, in response to questions from the Sydney Morning Herald, the Minister for Primary Industries, Ian Macdonald, said that a range of options, including a ban, were being considered for both lippia species and his department was developing a state management plan.

The media manager for Sydney Water, Damian Kelly, said the role of its website plant selector was merely to list common plants' water use, but that it would look into the confusion about lippia species.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Where is the DPI ?? Just shows how out of touch thi NSW Government is. Another show of "No Support" for the Agricultural Community in this State !!
Posted by What the . . . . . , 22/01/2009 11:35:09 AM
Another example of misinformed consevationists from government and elsewhere applying blatant idealism over proven proven fact and experience. Been going on since Whitlam.
Posted by Landholder, 23/01/2009 7:01:18 AM
I have an answer to "Where is the DPI". They are being strangled by a bankrupt NSW Govt, who sent themselves broke, causing Mr Carr to jump off a sinking ship leaving the survivors to disguise the fact. The next worry is: What is the alternative?
Posted by KJ, 23/01/2009 7:08:43 AM
Very pretty picture, but it does not do a thing to help identify the plant. A photo of an individual plant, and perhaps a botanical drawing with notes would help. Or better still, if there is a link with info on how to identify and eradicate this pest.
Posted by Nifty, 23/01/2009 8:27:40 AM
I posted a comment on weeds the other day in reference to the hawk weed being in the national parks. The DPI and others have to stop all plants coming into Australia. A plant that I failed to mention that literally makes see red is the gazannia. The shops are still selling them and they spread very quickly. I can give you a long story on the spread of these in 5 years from a neighbours few plants to virtually devastation in the Riverland of SA. I agree with Nifty on what or how do know what these plants look like.
Posted by Monica, 23/01/2009 9:17:04 AM
Hi everyone, Here is a web address for Weeds Australia, which gives a full description, with photos of the plant Lippia - Phyla canescens:

http://www.weeds.org.au/cgi-bin/weedident.cgi?tpl=plant.tpl& ibra=all&card=H59

You can copy and paste this into your search engine. Hope that this helps.

Posted by Noxious weed sold as 'waterwise', 23/01/2009 9:34:12 AM
Seems to me that only money talks - Close down any nursary or garden centre that supplies these noxious plants. It's wholesalers and retailers in the garden business who should be held accountable - if they don't know the ploblems caused by introduced plants, they shouldn't be in the nursary business. As for DPI - what do you expect from backroom bureaucrats - they aren't accountable for any of their bad decisions - they sit well removed from any situations their decisions create. It seems mostly they just make decisions just to show they are doing something - doesn't matter what the consequences are.
Posted by Gordons49, 23/01/2009 6:16:55 PM
The article stated that the sale of this weed was supported by our organisation. Unfortunately this is based on research which is available on-line which was carried out well over a decade ago. This plant initially seemed to be suitable because of its low water requirements, however the invasive nature of this plant soon became evident. Accordingly, Friends of the Earth has not supported the sale of this plant for many years now and believes it should be banned from sale. Regards, Cam Walker, campaigns co-ordinator, Friends of the Earth
Posted by Cam Walker, 24/01/2009 9:09:32 AM
Editor's note: Cam, our apologies for publishing the inaccuracy. The error has been rectified in the story, and a separate correction has also been published on FarmOnline.
Posted by Michael Thomson on 26/01/2009 8:47:40 AM
I had never heard of Lippia until last year and to see the devastation that it can cause to a landscape is heartbreaking...it looks really pretty as a lawn plant. Water Hyacinth- another pretty plant - combines with l Lippia to cause havoc in the Gwydir Wetlands. The public needs to be educated on the risks these introduced plants place on our biodiversity and ecological systems.
Posted by Melissa Dell, 27/01/2009 11:56:40 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Email Printer friendly version Normal font Large font
Email Printer friendly version Normal font Large font
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
POLL
Q: Should Nationals Senator Barnaby Joyce try a move to the House of Representatives at the next Federal election?

Yes
(51.8%)

No
(42.1%)

Other
(6.1%)

Total Votes: 444
Poll Date: 18 January, 2009

Most popular articles




The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...