News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Not one cent for soil carbon in new climate research fund 

Not one cent for soil carbon in new climate research fund

10 Jul, 2008 04:19 PM
Despite the Federal Government announcing an extra $46 in funds for climate change research for agriculture, nothing can be spared for measuring soil carbon on Australian farms.

The Government will dedicate $46.2m over five years to research that will help reduce greenhouse pollution from agriculture, improve soil management and adapt to climate change.

Agriculture Minister Tony Burke said specific projects could include research to reduce methane emissions from livestock.

But despite significant holes in the measurement of soil carbon holding back the farm sector from being part of an emissions trading scheme, Mr Burke said the research money would not go towards measuring soil sequestration.

The National Farmers Federation has welcomed the research boost, and hopes there will be a significant focus on the carbon "life-cycle" of agriculture and its role not just as an emitter or polluter, but also recognise the potential contribution agriculture can make to reducing Australia's emissions.

Greens Senator, Rachel Siewert, who is heading up a Senate Inquiry into the effects of climate change on agriculture, said this week that the capacity of regional communities to adapt to climate change was being undermined by the Federal Government.

"With drought and drier periods becoming the norm rather the exception we urgently need new ways to assist farmers to deal with climate variability and manage seasonal risk," Senator Siewert said.

She said evidence to the Senate Inquiry into Agricultural Adaptation to Climate Change last week highlighted that we would need to deal with the impacts of climate change of agriculture at a regional level, and that regional capacity would be fundamental to our ability to adapt.

She said Environment Minister, Peter Garrett was undermining Australia's ability to respond by slashing funding to regional NRM groups and Landcare networks through Caring for Our Country.

"There are some real success stories out there of farmers and researchers developing profitable systems that are more resilient to climate variability – but unless we maintain and extend our regional networks we won't have the capacity to get the message out and make these systems work at a local level."

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size


comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
I could well imagine that because the technology is so simple [and it seems to work, from the cases Soil Carbon's website put forward] there is very little in it for Big Business, so it won't receive any funding. Apparently [so we are told] we need a massive injection of new technology to combat climate change, and NOT plain simple ideas and changed ways of living!
Posted by physhure, 10/07/2008 5:46:51 PM
Once again Australia's rudimentary understanding of general agronomy fails us!!! In warmer climates I think you will find that Methane denatures and reverts back to water in the atmosphere. In the colder climates the methane addition is far more potent. The real problem for Australian agriculture lies in the fact that the government does not understand that SOIL CARBON IS THE PLUG FOR THE BATH that we are all trying to hold water in in this Carbon debate. Once again the farmers that understand the very nature of what needs to be done will be so far ahead of the legislation! In fact they are now!!
Posted by MICHAEL, 11/07/2008 10:38:24 AM
The system is about carbon EMISSION trading and that is the problem. Soil carbon storage has been ignored along with biocarbon storage elsewhere in the ecosystem e.g. in native forests.

The other big problems is to ensure all the money collected for research under the carbon tax is actually spent on reducing our emmissions in the future and is not used to compensate huge profitable foreign corporation that own Australian coal mines and power stations.

Posted by Macca, 11/07/2008 12:48:25 PM
I'm amazed. What can I say? The soil is the planet's major terrestrial store of carbon. Carbon in soil makes up more than the carbon in the atmosphere plus the standing biomass (e.g.trees and plants) -- 1.5 times as much (from memory). We have declining soil carbon problems in cultivated land -- all round the globe. So there is a lot of room for advances, and the science is just starting to get a handle on the carbon cycle in soil. Now is the time to invest to make the difference! It is not as simple as ploughing in some manure -- but we can be certain, that there must be a way -- since natural systems support much higher carbon contents. Can't believe this decision. How do I find out more about it?
Posted by max, 14/07/2008 9:29:47 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
POLL
Q: How do you rate the effectiveness of the current exceptional circumstances drought assistance program?

Excellent
(8.1%)

Good
(17.2%)

Average
(17.7%)

Poor
(24.7%)

Terrible
(32.3%)

Total Votes: 344
Poll Date: 06 July, 2008

Most popular articles

ELDERS NEWS MREC SJ



The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...