News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 No ETS, so doubt on $800m clean energy plant 

No ETS, so doubt on $800m clean energy plant

29 Apr, 2010 05:39 AM
THE indefinite delay of emissions trading will halt the cleaning of Victoria's energy supply, with Santos confirming it will not build a proposed $800 million gas power plant while there is uncertainty over a carbon price.

The oil and gas producer is investigating the feasibility of a 1500-megawatt, gas-fired power station at Shaw River, north of Port Fairy.

Proposed in 2008, the plant would be built in stages before reaching the size of a Latrobe Valley coal-fired station in 2020. It is estimated it would emit 70 per cent less greenhouse gas and use less than 1 per cent of the water of a brown-coal generator.

Santos chief executive David Knox said yesterday that a carbon price was needed to put gas-fired power on a level playing field with coal.

''It's very important for businesses such as ours to have certainty; we won't invest unless we have certainty,'' he said. ''Obviously we don't have that now with carbon pricing.''

The savings from deferring the emissions trading scheme and putting a price on carbon will be much less than the $2.8 billion predicted by the government last year, according to Treasurer Wayne Swan, but he would not say what they would be.

Sources say the cash amount available to the government will be ''substantially'' short of the figure in the mid-year budget forecasts. The gap is due to different accounting methods.

The savings had been seen as an important windfall for a government trying to get the budget back into surplus as soon as possible.

Going into damage control against a barrage of criticism of the decision to put the scheme on ice at least until 2013, Prime Minister Rudd said the government would speed up its rollout of its renewable energy plan.

''There is a truckload of work about to happen when it comes to renewable energy plans for the entire nation,'' he said. ''These projects will be rolled out one by one.''

The projects include the $1.5 billion large-scale solar flagship program, a shortlist for which is expected mid-year, and the $100 million smart grid project. Both were in last year's budget.

Mr Rudd also said two other projects would be announced soon that would generate 53 megawatts of power.

He said the government ''remains absolutely committed to the principle of a carbon pollution reduction scheme and its implementation''.

The government's commitment to greenhouse gas reduction targets remained unchanged. What had changed was the pathway to a scheme.

Renewable energy company Pacific Hydro said the ETS delay underlined the importance of proposed changes to the government's 20 per cent renewable energy target being passed by the Senate in the winter session.

The government has promised to fix flaws that promoted domestic technology at the expense of large-scale projects.

Pacific Hydro general manager Lane Crockett said the renewable energy target was ''the only thing keeping us here''.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
There is much dodgy goings on with these people. More about making money than anything to do with climate. They need continuance of the hoax to keep going.
Posted by Len, 30/04/2010 11:45:01 AM
As the article says, consistent carbon pricing is necessary for long term investments in GHG reducing technologies. An ETS is shown by the European experience to result in volatile carbon pricing. They commission the Garnaut report and dont take any notice of it? Not rocket science so why doesn't the government get it? Lobbying by banks etc who get a commission on trades by facilitating an ETS? Incompetence? The benefits of huge investments in GHG reducing technologies are being lost. The Chinese may be burning the coal but they are also way ahead in investments and creating industries to become a leader in technologies to reduce GHG gases. Australia as usual will just have to import the technologies developed from overseas.
Posted by terry, 30/04/2010 12:57:33 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
28 April, 2010
26 April, 2010
POLL
Q: Do you think Prime Minister Kevin Rudd's record in honouring election promises is any better or worse than his predecessors?

Better
(4.4%)

Worse
(79%)

About the same
(16.6%)

Total Votes: 687
Poll Date: 25 April, 2010

Most popular articles




The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...