News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 New push to 'green up' farm practices 

New push to 'green up' farm practices

17 Sep, 2009 07:39 PM
A PUSH to make Australian agriculture part of the environmental solution, rather than being considered the problem, emerged from what may prove to be a historic meeting at the weekend.

About 80 people, including farmers, scientists and consultants, met at the invitation of former Governor-General Major-General Michael Jeffery at Batemans Bay, NSW, for a discussion on the future of food, farming and agriculture's role in land restoration.

The dicussion will progress toward action via Outcomes Australia, a group chaired by Maj-Gen Jeffery that "takes the business of problem-solving outside the square".

"We gather together very capable people to work pro-bono to look at certain issues, and to use their intellect and resources to find solutions to particular questions," Maj-Gen Jeffery said.

The General plans to establish Outcomes Australia teams to address a range of issues, from the tangle of State and Federal environmental legislation to use of soil microbiology and the impacts of chemical-based farming.

He believes the core of the solution to many of Australia's environmental issues lies with the Natural Sequence Farming methods developed by Peter Andrews.

"We're not saying we have the total answer to all the problems in regenerating the landscape, but we have a pretty good indication of what needs to be done," Maj-Gen Jeffery said.

"I've spent the past six months visiting properties in many parts of the country and, for example, have seen what biological fertilisers can do for soil fertility and carbon sequestration."

"My main conclusion has been that Peter Andrews' ideas are applicable in a holistic sense across much of the country, supported by bio fertilisers and other measures."

Mr Andrew's ideas hinge on the understanding that 200 years of misinformed land management have dehydrated the landscape, with implications for stream flows, soil fertility and fire risk.

Adjunct Professor David Mitchell of Charles Sturt University's Institute for Land, Water and Society disagrees with Mr Andrews on certain details, but not on the general principle.

"Water is critical," Prof Mitchell said.

"Without knowing it, we have been drying out this countryside. A lot of our water resources were not in pools, but in soil and vegetation. When it rains those reservoirs start filling again, and there's less water for us. The current dryness is not just lack of rain."

Prof Mitchell applauds the General's initiative. "We have to bring together everyone who has a good idea on this issue," he said.

While few will quarrel with the ideal of restoring landscape health, not everyone is likely to be in favour of the approaches endorsed by the General.

He hopes that within a decade a third of Australia's farmers - and eventually all of them - will have stopped using artificial fertilisers, dramatically boosted vegetation species, substantially reduced or ceased irrigation and adopted a more holistic approach to farm management.

He also wants water to be recognised as the nation's most valuable asset, owned by the people and managed by the Federal Government.

"Our water has to be controlled at the national level with a value attached to it that equates to its importance," General Jeffery told the Batemans Bay gathering.

"Unless we can address the threat to world-wide water and food security, we stand to see conflict on a scale unknown since WWII."

Similar discussions have been held around the fringes of mainstream agriculture for many years, but this is the first time that such a radical overhaul of agriculture and landscape management has had the backing of a leading public figure.

And in a clear sign that this is more than just a talk-fest, the Batemans Bay meeting was sponsored by Federal Departments of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts and Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, CSIRO and NSW Industry and Investment.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
single page


RELATED COVERAGE

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
The Governor General's motives may be noble, but his proposed method is not. Total Govt. control is not the answer. If it is imposed, you WILL see a conflict unequaled since WWII!

The market will determine producer participation. Start paying us properly for what we produce, and production won't take the cheapest alternative with the short term view.

Posted by Brindi, 17/09/2009 9:40:28 PM, on The Land
Any 'look' at farming practices must be welcomed. The 'dry continent' must store water when and where it falls...this commodity can then be moved to where it is needed. There is another question of where, and how water is used.

Tasmania, the smallest state but blessed by fertility and a propitious climate and a higher than average rainfall, is cursed by a group of 'green' dreamers, who want the world to be the way it should be. But, it is not!!

And we are further 'cursed' by a group who have an agenda of getting attention rather than solving problems of a growing human population using a scarce water resource.

Posted by Sanders Frith-Brown, 18/09/2009 6:35:11 AM, on The Land
I hope the Qld government and bureaucrats are prepared to listen to this. After all, they wouldn't listen to traditional owners who recommended a similar approach to land management...that is, see the land and its use from a holistic viewpoint.
Posted by bushie, 18/09/2009 6:51:42 AM, on Queensland Country Life
When are we going to throw off the hair shirt and stop looking at everything as bad? Most producers are doing the right thing already and are well aware of their responsibilities to a sustainable environment. They also need to meet market demands and make a living.

Twelve years of below average rainfall have caused much of our problems, and we are learning how to adapt to shorter growing seasons.

If the last 200 years have been a problem, what about the previous 40,000 years, when burning destroyed all fire susceptible species of trees and made Australia an open savannah environment?

Let's stop the blame game, and encourage productive and sustainable practices. The world desperately needs our food. Without phosphorous and water, we produce very little.

The increasing global population will not give us the luxury of selfishly turning Australia into a continent of trees instead of a food bowl.

Posted by Practical Farmer, 18/09/2009 9:37:29 AM, on Stock & Land
General Jeffrey may well have been a very competent soldier but he is neither a farmers, nor an environmental stewards' armpit.

If everyone in the Murray-Darling basin did what Peter Andrews suggests, then not a single drop of water would ever make it to the sea. And if Mr Jeffrey was serious about perceptions of farmers he would be working to get us recognition for all the ecological benefits we already deliver, free of charge.

He may see himself as a friend of farmers but Sun Tsu might also have had someone like him in mind when he said, "my most feared enemy is a foolish ally".

Six months exposure to one perspective and he thinks he has mastered the brief? Give us a break, fella, you got 90pc of the learning curve ahead of you yet.

Posted by Ian Mott, 18/09/2009 10:43:03 AM, on Queensland Country Life
This meeting championed by Maj-Gen Jeffrey and the foundation of Outcomes Australia is a fantastic breakthrough for looking at our water and food security needs in harmony with the way our natural system works, and will contribute greatly to mitigating the effect of global warming.

We need to observe and imitate how the natural system operates to build our depleted natural capital of our landscape.

This need not be done in isolation of modern technology, but use our technological skills to assist the natural process not dominate them.

Posted by concerned, 18/09/2009 11:07:26 AM, on The Land
My understanding of Peter Andrew's method of farming is that he is interfering with the flow of water in creeks and gullies. I did not think this was allowed in Qld.
Posted by mac, 18/09/2009 11:59:24 AM, on Queensland Country Life
Love it!!! People in the city have the worst environmental habits and just because cows fart that means the farmers get most of the blame.

You dont see many trees or nature areas in the city.

What about all of the crops, trees and natural habitats in the country that soak up the citys CO2 emissions. I am fairly sure the emissions on farm are nowhere near the amount that they would capture.

How about they focus more on the habits of urban areas than pointing the finger all the time at farmers!

Posted by Farm girl, 18/09/2009 12:28:43 PM, on Farm Weekly
With regard to Brindi's comment saying: "The market will determine producer participation. Start paying us properly for what we produce, and production won't take the cheapest alternative with the short term view."

It's a hard ask to want both market forces and 'being paid properly' in the same proposition. My understanding of the Jeffery's Taskforce is that it champions shifting resources from the city, where most carbon is emitted, to the country where most carbon is sequestered.

It's not about telling farmers how to ply their trade. It's about rehabilitating the rural landscape, ecologically and socio-economically. Everyone wins.

Let's not argue over the fine print before the draft is put out for discussion.

Posted by Paul Cockram, 18/09/2009 5:39:13 PM, on The Land
Hurrah! At last a "big picture approach" to bridging the divide between city and country. Well done Michael Jeffery. By the way (for those who might have been on this planet for be less than about 40 years), most of the rural landscape in this country is in much better condition now than it was 50 or 100 years ago, thanks to continuous improvement in farming practices and technology, much of it driven by a need for sustainability of production. We need to keep these improvements moving steadily. NB: we don't need interference by agriculturally-unqualified bureaucrats. We also need to reinvigorate conservation and agricultural research and extension services working closely (directly) with farmers, like we had in the 1950s to 1990s, agronomists, livestock officers and soil conservationists - in the agencies which our governments have since then progressively dismantled or neutered.
Posted by AJ, 19/09/2009 11:13:14 AM, on The Land
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Former Governor-General, Major-General Michael Jeffery, hopes that within a decade a third of Australia's farmers - and eventually all of them - will have stopped using artificial fertilisers, dramatically boosted vegetation species, substantially reduced or ceased irrigation and adopted a more holistic approach to farm management.
Former Governor-General, Major-General Michael Jeffery, hopes that within a decade a third of Australia's farmers - and eventually all of them - will have stopped using artificial fertilisers, dramatically boosted vegetation species, substantially reduced or ceased irrigation and adopted a more holistic approach to farm management.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
15 September, 2009
17 September, 2009
POLL
Q: If a federal election were held this weekend, for which party would you vote?

Labor
(13%)

Liberal
(30.8%)

Nationals
(35.4%)

Greens
(8.1%)

Family First
(1.6%)

Independent
(8.6%)

Other
(2.6%)

Total Votes: 1073
Poll Date: 13 September, 2009

Most popular articles

Ray White Rural NSW Beef Spectacular
 
Photo Library
 
Land Subscriptions
 
Horse Deals Australia
 
The Land Facebook
 
The Land Twitter


 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...