News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 New economic model needed for carbon fight 

New economic model needed for carbon fight

04 Dec, 2009 03:26 PM
Instead of the "development at all costs" economic model dominating world affairs, new pluralist economic thinking is needed if the world is to successfully combat climate change and address inequity.

That’s the broad conclusion of several academic and development economists writing in the report, Other Worlds Are Possible, the sixth report from the Working Group on Climate Change and Development.

"We have the unprecedented challenge of meeting human need in the face of climate change, resource scarcity and a deeply troubled world economy," the report’s introduction says.

"To this upheaval, there is unlikely to be a single other answer."

Chilean economist Professor Manfred Max-Neef captured the outlook of the report in the comment that the search for solutions must start with new models that, "above all else, begin to accept the limits of the carrying capacity of the Earth".

"We need to move from efficiency to sufficiency and well-being … The paradigm shift requires turning away from economic growth at any cost.

"Transition must be towards societies that can adjust to reduced levels of production and consumption, favouring localised systems of economic organisation. We need again to look to the inside."

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
"We have the unprecedented challenge of meeting human need in the face of climate change." Where is the proof of climate change?
Posted by pops, 4/12/2009 3:58:28 PM
There is no proof of carbon forced climate change, only flawed computer models. There is however a significant body of real-world data that disproves the theory of carbon forced climate change.
Posted by Qlander, 6/12/2009 4:49:22 PM
Climate change is coming, no doubt about it. At the present rate of change in about 10,000 years the Arctic will once more be tropical. In about 60,000 to 100,000 years there will be another major ice age over North America. Only fools and those charlatans who stand to make money on global warming fears are still spouting this nonsense about global warming coming next week.
Posted by jaimie, 7/12/2009 5:03:40 AM
This is not just about climate change but finally the realisation that we humans are only one part of this world where ever-increasing demands on energy, water and soil will deplete and exceed the natural capacity to sustain life as we have known it. Ultimately, nature will win and she is already showing her hand with extreme weather events becoming more regular. Is this the future we want for us, our children and their children? Farming within the ecosystem and reducing energy inputs to naturally constrain and sequester carbon is the only way of the future.
Posted by Gerhard, 7/12/2009 5:34:34 AM
Good to see the voice of commom sense making it to the mainstream media. I hope this point of view will be elaborated on even more in the times to come. Unfortunately though, I believe we are more likely to see countries like China take the lead on this model and ditching efficiency in order to move to sufficiency and well-being... They have the authoritarian governments which can take the lead and move the nation towards the success... And most western so called democracies don't have the Leaders with the capital "L" but bunches of clowns leading them towards the economic and environmental disaster and future misery.
Posted by Andrew, 7/12/2009 7:52:34 AM
This report is typical of the parasitical scientists running the population bomb theory once again.
Posted by Len, 7/12/2009 8:08:38 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
02 December, 2009
03 December, 2009
POLL
Q: If an election were held next weekend, for which party would you vote?

Labor
(13.8%)

Liberal
(31%)

National
(34.5%)

Greens
(12.7%)

Family First
(1.3%)

Independent
(4.3%)

Other
(2.4%)

Total Votes: 1267
Poll Date: 29 November, 2009

Most popular articles




The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...