News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Nation ill-equipped for green future 

Nation ill-equipped for green future

14 Sep, 2009 05:44 AM
AUSTRALIA is in the weakest position of any industrialised nation to compete in a clean-energy world, a new report has found.

Despite high levels of wealth and education, the nation's heavy-polluting coal-fired electricity, its energy-intensive exports like aluminium and its high levels of car ownership make it one of the developed countries least able to generate prosperity in a future marked by drastic cuts to greenhouse gas emissions.

The report, commissioned by the Climate Institute and the European environmental group E3G, compared the performance of the Group of 20 countries, including Australia, the US, China and India, as their leaders prepared to meet in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, this month.

Climate change and clean energy investment will be high on the agenda at the G20 meeting, on September 24-25. G20 economies account for almost 70 per cent of the world's carbon emissions.

The report, G20 Low Carbon Competitiveness, placed Australia as the "lowest ranked" major industrialised country in terms of its ability to generate material prosperity for its people in a world that limits greenhouse gas emissions. China, Russia and Turkey outranked Australia.

The only G20 countries to sit below Australia were Indonesia and Saudi Arabia.

France topped the list of nations able to compete in a clean energy world. The report found that while the French and Australian economies are broadly similar in size, France gets three times as much gross domestic product for each tonne of its carbon emissions as Australia.

"I didn't think we would be as far behind as this," said John Connor, chief executive of the Climate Institute. "Many of our trading partners are moving faster than us, and we risk missing opportunities for investment, jobs and profits in emerging clean-energy industries."

Yesterday protesters converged on Australia's most heavily polluting coal-fired power plant, Hazelwood, in the La Trobe Valley, calling for it to be shut down and replaced with renewable energy.

A heavy police contingent moved in when demonstrators began to scale the fence around the plant to present a "community decommission order" to its owners, the British company International Power.

A spokeswoman for the protest, Louise Morris, said police arrested 22 people, including doctors, teachers and scientists, and charged them with trespass.

The Prime Minister, Kevin Rudd, will attend the G20 meeting in Pittsburgh, at which leaders will also discuss the Copenhagen climate negotiations and the fallout from the financial crisis.

Next week Mr Rudd will attend a summit of world leaders in New York hosted by the United Nations Secretary-General, Ban Ki-moon, aimed at revitalising the global climate negotiations.

The New York summit will be the first opportunity for the US President, Barack Obama, to make a big pitch on climate change. He is expected to urge developed and developing countries to invest in clean energy. He is also expected to press the US Senate to pass a clean energy bill by the end of the year that aims to limit US greenhouse gas emissions.

Last week, his special envoy for climate change, Todd Stern, told Congress the effort to reach a new climate agreement in Copenhagen was about the development of clean energy, too.

"Countries that would cling to the old developing world adage that development must precede the environment make a fundamental error,'' he said. ''In the world we inhabit now, the only sustainable development is low-carbon development."

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
France has a low carbon ratio because they use nuclear power which is the cleanest and most efficient form of generation.

France does not play around with wind and solar that clearly do not work. If Australia wants clean power, stop mucking around and giving taxpayers money to useless industries.

Posted by mick, 14/09/2009 7:25:24 AM
The climate institute is funded largly by renewable energy companies, and, contrary to what its name implies, it not a institute, but a lobby group.

Anything these people say should be taken with a grain of salt - if they had their way none of us would have electricity as we would be relying on the wind for it. What a disaster that would be!

This is just another contrived report to try to convince the government to give them more subsidys for wind farms.

Posted by alan, 14/09/2009 10:39:19 AM
. . . and soil farmers haven't received billions of dollars in subsidies and other support from the government over the years, have they?
Posted by Marc, 15/09/2009 8:43:59 AM
I am sure America, China and India are more than us!
Posted by tigerdicky, 15/09/2009 8:51:13 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
11 September, 2009
13 September, 2009
POLL
Q: If a federal election were held this weekend, for which party would you vote?

Labor
(13%)

Liberal
(30.8%)

Nationals
(35.4%)

Greens
(8.1%)

Family First
(1.6%)

Independent
(8.6%)

Other
(2.6%)

Total Votes: 1073
Poll Date: 13 September, 2009
BLOGS
09 September, 2009

Most popular articles

Advertisement



The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...