News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Live export trade not undercutting Australian jobs, says Mackinnon 

Live export trade not undercutting Australian jobs, says Mackinnon

22 Mar, 2010 12:53 PM
AUSTRALIAN Livestock Exporters chief executive Lach Mackinnon has questioned the validity of the Australian Meat Industry Employees Union’s (AMEU) claim that the nations’ live export industry is the cause of thousands of meat processing workers losing their jobs.

He says the rising Australian dollar and shrinking livestock supply was more of a contributing factor.

As an unlikely alliance of the AMEU and animal welfare groups met last Wednesday at Sydney’s Parliament House to take part in a forum led by Sydney’s Lord Mayor Clover Moore aimed at shutting down Australia’s live export industry, Mr Mackinnon said it was disappointing the two groups had banded together to undermine live trade when the sector had funded a large amount of money to improve animal welfare practices in its overseas markets.

In comments that are likely to intensify the already strained relationship between the animal welfare groups and the live export industry, Mr Mackinnon claimed comments that the Australian government was subsidising its industry were completely unfounded, which is being pushed by World Society for the Protection of Animals (WSPA) program manager Emily Reeves.

“What they are saying is completely untrue, as the reality in regard to last six months with abattoirs closing down and shifts being cut back is it is due to the high Australian dollar and exchange rates in the markets’ high quality meat goes into,” Mr Mackinnon told Rural Press.

“We obviously feel for the people who lost their jobs but it has got nothing to do with us.”

The leaders of several animal rights groups – including WSPA and PETA, were joined by members of AMEU, at NSW parliament house to petition the government to step in and end the live trade.

In the forum, the union members and animal activists warned about the implications of continuing live trade, saying the “inhumane” activity should be replaced by sending chilled or frozen meat products to export markets.

They also pushed for a “fair chance” for Australian meat processors, claiming that up to 40,000 jobs had been lost in the sector in the last 35 years due to live trade taking away its market share.

“Our view is that it’s not only an inhumane trade, but live export trade takes jobs from Australian workers,” AMEU federal secretary Brian Crawford said.

“We believe we have the capacity to perform those jobs in Australia to further value add and protect the local industry.”

Mr Crawford said he believed the live export sector was the most serious threat confronting the future viability of the processing sector.

“If both state and federal governments can’t accept there’s a problem by the time they wake up it might be too late,” he said.

But Mr Mackinnon dismissed this allegation, saying price fluctuations in a commodity spot market were just part of every day life.

“Sheep is now an expensive commodity because they are in short supply – that’s the reality of a spot market,” he said.

Australia's live exports last year were worth $994 million.

The mounting tension over live export came as Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry Tony Burke announced last Wednesday a boost of around $1 million to fund three projects aimed at improving post-arrival animal welfare by upgrading animal handling infrastructure and providing training for those involved in animal handling and transport in the Middle East and South East Asia.

“Our involvement in the livestock export trade and our international leadership in animal welfare allows Australia to influence conditions for animals in overseas markets,” Mr Burke said in a statement.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Any one who believes that PETA and WSPA really want want the livetrade replaced by sending chilled or frozen meat products to export markets must be dreaming. PETA and WSPA want to close down farming, nothing less. Even today PETA in the USA are going after Mike Tyson (the boxer) over his interests in racing pigeons! No sane individual could back this ridiculous marriage of convience between the union and the People Against the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA).
Posted by Tom, 22/03/2010 4:09:27 PM
Shrinking livestock trade? There are tens of thousands of sheep and cattle in Australia, all impacting on grazing and waterways. The jobs should stay in Australia, not go overseas. This is what the live export trade is doing, poaching jobs from Australians. Why should we bow to some silly "religious" fetish about having to kill their own "meat"!
Posted by Vivienne, 22/03/2010 8:21:09 PM
Well said Lach MacKinnon. Prices paid by live exporters for both cattle and sheep mean the difference betwween profit and loss for many farmers. For those processors who support the move by Clover Moore and the AMEU they should instead concentrate on lobbying government to cut regulatory cost burdens to allow packers to compete with the live exporters. Clover Moore has just increased the gap between the city and country that has already become a chasm. Clover and the AMEU have just poored petrol on the political division between Labour and Farmers I thought we had progressed in the last 120 years obviosly not. Where does Steve Whan sit on this issue.
Posted by Brad Bellinger, 23/03/2010 6:40:53 AM
Although Vivienne infers livestock are the reason for land and water issues, people like her seem to naively believe that, if the "farmed" livestock are taken away nothing would replace them. Wrong. Wild animals of all sorts, some destructive, would fill the void as and when feed allowed. Further, the "food gap" would have to be filled by other foods (crops) which would be (a) more input intensive, and (b) impossible to grow in many areas where livestock are farmed.
Posted by JayDin, 23/03/2010 7:21:06 AM
Keep jobs in Australia. Let overseas countries breed their own livestoc and create their own jobs. Live export does impact on local jobs. How can it not? The more animals that go overseas the less that are processed here. Keep jobs in our country.
Posted by mjm, 23/03/2010 7:44:32 AM
Our wild animals are not destructive! Our wildlife have evolved here over millions of years, and we have one of the most rich countries in the world in terms of biodiversity. They are perfectly adapted to live harmoniously in our land, and their grazing pressure is minimal compared to livestock. In fact, they actually add value to the land. There are many native potential crops that could be grown and harvested, but this is being ignored by our agriculturalists. Livestock is a very inefficient for of food production. The live export trade is cruel and unethical, and stealing local jobs.
Posted by Vivienne, 23/03/2010 8:06:02 AM
I find it incomprehensible that anyone in their right mind would question the fact that over 5 million animals being taken out of Australia to be processed elsewhere wouldn’t have an impact on our local meat processing industry. In regards to the subsidies Mr Mackinnon, did or did not the Government spend several millions on a road to the Townsville port for the live export industry? This road goes straight past abattoirs and straight past Australian families that are now jobless due to this trade. And great to see Tony Burke continuing to spout his rubbish. Funny that just two days after the Sydney forum he decides to put in a measly million bucks – for what exactly? If the live export trade is worth 1.8 billion as claimed then that’s a mere 0.06% of that figure, or like others have pointed out just 22 cents per animal. What can you buy for 22 cents? Certainly not animal welfare. A good bit of government spin? Perhaps. And I love how Peta gets dragged into this - they had nothing to do with the forum. It was WSPA and AMIEU reps only, get your facts straight!
Posted by Justin Medcalf, 23/03/2010 9:31:07 AM
When I saw the video on people losing their livelihoods because of this trade, that was it for me. Live export needs to be phased out and now. A recent study shows that farmers needn't suffer any losses either, there is a way that everyone can win. To say the industry isnt taking jobs away is just so untrue. Government should give the abattoirs a level playing field by not subsidising the live export industry and actively promoting chilled products overseas.
Posted by Judy, 23/03/2010 11:25:21 AM
@vivienne Your ignornace is astounding - to state "Our wild animals are not destructive!" shows either you view the world through rose coloured glasses or you are deliberately distorting reality - i suspect it is both! Having witnessed first hand the destruction kangaroos in plague proportions can do to native pastures in far western NSW your assertion that 'our wild animals are not destructive' rings hollow. The six thousand acre paddock had been destocked for three years and had a good body of feed both annuals and periennials. Thousands of roos moved through it and in less than a fortnight had chewed off every blade of grass below ground level - you are right that have been here for thousands of years and evolved to an extraordinary level, however like anything that needs to eat to survive it can be extremely destructive. Vivienne instead of spouting your mantra and hatred of of Australian farmers why dont you name these mythical crops? Further given your comments will you support the efforts of farmers and others to establish a viable 'chilled meat' market for roo meat for human in the middle east and other countries we currently export animals too?
Posted by tom, 23/03/2010 11:36:48 AM
The live export trade is sickening - not only because it is incredibly cruel and around 40,000 sheep didnt even survive the journey last year, but because it is literally taking jobs away from Aussie families. Some of these meat workers are struggling to feed their kids, and the exporting companies really dont seem to care. It is time to bring this trade to an end. The fact that animal welfare groups and the AMEU have formed this unlikely alliance should show just how urgent this matter has become.
Posted by Vanessa, 23/03/2010 11:51:38 AM
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
21 March, 2010
18 March, 2010
POLL
Q: Should any of the three AWI directors criticised by Italian manufacturers earlier in the month resign?

Yes - all three
(64.6%)

Yes - but only Olssen and Sheil
(2.7%)

Yes - but only Modiano and Olssen
(0.4%)

Yes - but only Modiano and Sheil
(0%)

Yes - but only Olssen
(1.9%)

Yes - but only Sheil
(0.8%)

Yes - but only Modiano
(0.8%)

No
(29%)

Total Votes: 525
Poll Date: 21 March, 2010

Most popular articles

Advertisement



The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...