News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Irrigators' incomes on the slide 

Irrigators' incomes on the slide

10 Nov, 2008 10:05 AM
An ABARE survey of 900 irrigation farms across ten regions in the Murray-Darling Basin has revealed that returns for all irrigators were affected by drought, lower than normal water allocations and higher input costs in 2006-07.

The survey sought information on irrigated agricultural production, the financial situation of irrigators and the issues faced in maintaining farm profitability.

The report states that irrigated horticulture farms realised an average rate of return to capital and management of 1.8pc compared with 0.5pc for broadacre farms and minus 0.3pc for dairy farms.

Overall, the survey results show a wide variability in financial performance across irrigation farms in all regions and industries in 2006-07.

"There is considerable diversity between irrigation farms across the Basin, in terms of area operated, the degree to which farms rely on irrigation, and the extent of on-farm investment in irrigation infrastructure," ABARE's acting executive director Karen Schneider said.

Despite receiving lower than normal water allocations in 2006-07, dairy farmers were able to irrigate nearly three-quarters of the area established for irrigation on their farms.

Horticulture producers irrigated around 70pc of the area set up for irrigation, while broadacre producers irrigated around 31pc of the area established for irrigation in 2006-07.

Ms Schneider said that prior to this survey there was little comprehensive or consistent information across the Basin on the economic characteristics of irrigators.

"This report provides economic and physical profiles of irrigators by region and industry for the 2006-07 financial year," she said.

"The current and likely future water situation in the Basin has focused attention on a range of challenging water issues.

"This report is an important step in addressing the issues facing irrigators, with the results providing a basis for examining future trends in industry performance."

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Heh Heh Hee Hee Soon there won' t be any of them left neither. With carbon trading, buy back and waterstealing we' ll get rid 'o 'em. Can always buy food from overseas, y' know. The chinese make wonderful fresh green peas from fresh p...! No quality standards, see fatal fresh milk, protein-boosted too! They don't and will never have, carbon trading rubbish and will laugh at us. They won't have to buy us, just walk right in and sit right down. Penny Wrong ..er.. Wong
Posted by zulu, 11/11/2008 8:11:56 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
POLL
Q: Will farmers be better off if agriculture is included in a carbon emissions trading system?

Yes - selling carbon will make us more profitable
(23%)

No - carbon taxes will increase our costs
(46%)

Undecided - We need more information
(31%)

Total Votes: 574
Poll Date: 09 November, 2008

Most popular articles

Advertisement



The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...