News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Incitec posts $614m profit, but seeks $1.17b in new capital 

Incitec posts $614m profit, but seeks $1.17b in new capital

12 Nov, 2008 02:55 PM
Incitec Pivot is embarking on a $1.17 billion capital raising program despite today posting a record $614 million net profit after tax for the full year to September 30.

IPL's profit result marks a whopping increase of $409m or 199pc on the previous year.

"This is an outstanding result based upon a strategy which we are confident will continue to deliver value to our shareholders in the years ahead," IPL managing director and chief executive, Julian Segal, said.

A final dividend of 19.5 cents per share fully franked will take the total dividend per share for the year to 29.7c, an increase of 98pc.

Mr Segal said he expected the company to continue enjoying "earnings momentum", despite the volatile financial environment.

"We expect the strong long-term mining and agricultural industry fundamentals to continue," Mr Segal said.

"For our fertiliser business, world food stocks remain at low levels and this will create demand for agricultural nutrients."

Despite its success, the company is still embarking on a massive capital raising offer, comprising $819m in institutional entitlements and $351m in retail entitlements.

The purpose of the fund raising is to refinance the $2.4b bridging facility IPL entered into in May to pay for the cash component of its acquisition of explosives maker Dyno Nobel.

"Additionally the capital raising secures our strong balance sheet and positions us for future growth in our key fertiliser and industrial explosives markets while maintaining our uncompromising financial discipline and credit metrics which we believe to be consistent with an investment grade credit profile," Mr Segal said.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Profit at the expense of who? If rural sector sales decline, they can flip to mining. This is gouging the farm sector.
Posted by Ando, 13/11/2008 10:39:37 AM
Where's the ACCC now?
Posted by Screwed, 13/11/2008 9:37:04 PM
(canegrower) who side is the accc on? definitely not on the agriculture side. $1304 a ton for urea, two and a half times the price we paid last year, at presant the price over seas is $343 a ton.--still paying $1304 a tonn. why did we shoot ned kelly? he was an angel, rob the rich give to the poor. he was an australian??????
Posted by chrismaryloi, 16/11/2008 6:19:46 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
POLL
Q: Will farmers be better off if agriculture is included in a carbon emissions trading system?

Yes - selling carbon will make us more profitable
(23%)

No - carbon taxes will increase our costs
(46%)

Undecided - We need more information
(31%)

Total Votes: 574
Poll Date: 09 November, 2008

Most popular articles

SPRAY AWARDS NEWS MREC



The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...