News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Hunting ferals: Good for the environment or just gets your goat? 

Hunting ferals: Good for the environment or just gets your goat?

20 Oct, 2008 05:44 PM
In the early-morning mist, a herd of feral goats moves cautiously along a bush track in an area of state forest called Pennsylvania, near Blayney in Central Western NSW.

Two hundred metres away, Brian Boyle, a veteran hunter and the chief executive of the Game Council of NSW, dons a camouflage suit and face mask, and picks up his hunting bow.

"We're upwind - I'm going around them," he whispers.

Boyle is doing what he loves but what happens next sharply divides the rural community.

The Game Council has overseen the creation of over a hundred new "conservation hunting" reserves on public land in the last two years. The NSW Government announced another 92 new hunting zones in the Riverina on Friday.

The idea is to regulate hunting by allowing enthusiasts to target non-native "pest" species such as pigs, goats, deer and wild dogs.

But some environment groups and bush users believe hunting for sport is bloodthirsty and inhumane, and an inefficient way of keeping invasive species at bay.

There are about 1 million to 3 million feral goats roaming Australia, descended from a few thousand farm escapees. The herd in Pennsylvania State Forest is about 20 strong.

Boyle stalks in a wide, silent arc around the herd. The goats seem aware of a presence but continue to amble along the bush track, pausing regularly to chew leaves. Long minutes pass.

Then a faint thud. For one goat standing apart from the herd, the days of wandering the forest are over. Boyle, who has worked in an abattoir, expertly dismembers the carcass. Ten minutes after it was having breakfast, the goat is somebody else's.

"I don't understand people who oppose conservation hunting because the environmental benefits are enormous," Boyle said. "Hunters are some of the best conservationists around because they know the land and they have an understanding of animals and their behaviour. They are around to observe at times of day when no one else can."

Conservation hunting is big in the US, but is a more recent innovation in Australia. Under Game Council regulations, licenses are granted if volunteers meet skill and safety criteria, and revoked if rules are broken. About 6000 hunters are licensed under the scheme, and the council is keen to recruit more.

The organisation's meticulous post-hunt scorecards record the termination of 6436 rabbits, 3012 goats, 2478 feral pigs, 1507 foxes, 283 feral cats and 115 wild dogs in the last two years. "There's no better way to make friends with a farmer than to get rid of a few foxes," Boyle said.

Not everyone is happy to see public land used for recreational hunts. Bushwalkers and horse riders have reported qualms about sharing public bushland with a growing number of camouflaged hunters. And the NSW Greens believe the Government's willingness to declare more than 2 million hectares of public land available to conservation hunters has more to do with appeasing the NSW Shooters Party than a love of native wildlife.

"It is in the interests of these hunters to have plenty of potential game animals available in the hunting parks, so the idea that they are eradicating pests does not stack up," says a Greens MP, Lee Rhiannon. "Controlling pests should be part of a wildlife management plan, not a recreational pursuit."

The NSW Government says hunting in each newly gazetted reserve will be part of an invasive species management plan.

"These forests contain important native wildlife which must be protected from feral animals, including foxes and wild pigs," the Primary Industries Minister, Ian Macdonald, said in a statement.

"The Game Council and Forests NSW will implement seasonal closures of a number of these forests to coincide with peak-use periods by other visitors."

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
6436 rabbits, 3012 goats, 2478 feral pigs, 1507 foxes, 283 feral cats and 115 wild dogs can't lie. If the greens were serious about conservation they would get behind this. Bushwalkers, hunters, and other outdoor enthusiasts co-exist amicably in NZ, wihout conflicts. I think the concerns expressed by the other legitimate users are due to a lack of experience in knowing how such arrangements work. The fact is, hunters are not going to want to hunt where the people are -- since the game and pest species avoid areas frequented by people. They may see them traveling in or out along the tracks, but are unlikly to see them in the act of hunting -- that is my NZ experience.
Posted by Matt, 21/10/2008 9:14:11 AM
"Conservation hunting" in State Forests (SFs) was a sell out to the gun lobby by our incompetent State Labor Government. Most recreational users of SFs would be unaware of the authorised hunting. Whilst licenced hunters are usually responsible, entrances of appropriate forests are NOT signposted when hunting is taking place. It is only a matter of time before some innocent hiker, cyclist, camper etc is shot. By the way, my understanding is that authorised hunters are to wear bright jackets. What's with the camoflage gear Rambo?
Posted by razor, 21/10/2008 9:45:39 AM
It's cheaper than the State Government forking out tax payers money to control pests. Look at Toorale? Imagine the potential for pigs and goats to explode there? As long as these hunters are accreditated and are acting humanely I have no problem with it.
Posted by HW, 21/10/2008 10:10:40 AM
The statistics from hospital admissions demonstrate that hunting is actually one of the safest of all sports. Every person licenced to hunt in NSW State Forests has passed a character check, a background check, a competency check and at least two safety tests. Very few other users of public land have been passed under such a high level of scrutiny. The use of volunteer hunters for the management of pest and game animal populations is considered "Best Practice" throughout the world. Closer to home, volunteer hunters have been used to reduce feral animal populations in some of South Australia's National Parks for well over a decade. Not only has this been conducted without a single significant incident, but the Parks' managment have expressed a high level of satisfaction with the outcomes. Regardless of the green groups' emotional objection to hunting, they have yet to propose a single alternative that is both practical and cost-effective on the scale required. With this in mind, it is easy to conclude that they would rather see native fauna destroyed by foxes, than see those same foxes hunted by competent, accredited volunteers.
Posted by Farmer Pete., 21/10/2008 10:11:06 AM
I'd like to congratulate the Primary Industries Minister, Ian Macdonald, and the NSW government on committing to such a great program. It's impressive to see a government recognise the hidden resource of recreational hunters, and recognise the conservation merits of tapping into this very cheap and target specific method of feral animal control. Not only does the scheme support conservation in controlling our feral pest problem, it also supports recreational hunting and its traditions in a responsible and respectable matter. We need a program like this in Qld.
Posted by Ben, 21/10/2008 10:43:10 AM
In western NSW feral goat numbers have increased alarmingly over the last 30 years. They are turning the Western Division into a desert, and no-one is doing anything about them. Struggling farmers see them as a source of income, but this is short-term thinking as the goats are destroying their properties.
Posted by Barney, 21/10/2008 11:15:31 AM
Over the years the Colong foundation for Wilderness (no less) has advocated the aerial shooting of feral horses in NSW National Parks. If one of the most science-based, research-oriented and oldest and respected conservation organisations in Australia (like the Sierra Club in the USA) advocates shooting as a control method - albeit by professional cullers, then surely these pseudo conservationists bleating from their inner-city fortresses against reality have no basis for an argument - unless it's purely emotive claptrap designed to appeal to masses of deluded bambi watchers. Responsible, approved hunters are a significant part of the solution. Mindless, ill-informed urban "greens" who will not entertain productive dialogue with hunters are the problem, or should I say "issue" in the modern parlance.
Posted by Mod, 21/10/2008 12:59:07 PM
Thank 'GOD' there is an alternative to pest control other than the poison 1080.
Posted by capt al, 21/10/2008 1:55:25 PM
I concur with Ben's comment, we need to see a similar thing in Western Australia. My experience with the deer hunting season in northern USA sees that this proactive conservation work generates a lot of revenue for regional and rural areas due to the need for accommodation, supplies and associated services. As long as the licensing requirement are kept uniform on a nationwide basis, I say bring it on!
Posted by the_don, 21/10/2008 2:05:13 PM
Razor. It wasn't a sell out at all, base things on fact, not what you think it was. The hunting has been widely advertised, & farmers adjoining the forests were advised of the activities. All hunting forests "are" signposted, though people who oppose the hunting, "irresponsibly" steal the signposts. Most game animals are colour blind, so they don't see the blaze colours on our heads, just a shade of grey, while our bodies fit into the enviroment, with different shades of green. So you wouldn't wear a white or black t-shirt in the bush hunting would you? It's only a matter of time, till we loose all our native animals, cos people like you are worried about a proven, very low risk sport. Base things on fact, not emotion!
Posted by Rob the Shooter, 21/10/2008 5:39:10 PM
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Getting the point… the detail of the arrow used by Brian Boyle. Photo: Nick Moir
Getting the point… the detail of the arrow used by Brian Boyle. Photo: Nick Moir
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
POLL
Q: Who will receive your first vote in the AWI board elections?

Brian van Rooyen
(19.7%)

George Falkiner
(14.1%)

Chris Abell
(3.8%)

Will Roberts
(7%)

Ken Boundy
(1.6%)

David Webster
(7.8%)

Robyn Clubb
(3.5%)

Meredith Sheil
(12.7%)

John Keniry
(5.4%)

Laurence Modiano
(24.3%)

Total Votes: 370
Poll Date: 19 October, 2008

Most popular articles

SPRAY AWARDS NEWS MREC



The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...