News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Griffith burns in anger 

Griffith burns in anger

15 Dec, 2011 02:30 PM
AN estimated 12,000 community members attended yesterday's Murray Darling Basin Authority meeting in Griffith, expressing dire concern about the draft Basin Plan’s potential impact on their futures, due to its proposed drastic water reductions.

About 280 local businesses closed for the morning to attend the fiery meeting and submit their views to the Authority’s community consultation process.

Buses trucked crowds to and from the Yoogali Club and black-armbands were worn by crowd members to signify their displeasure with the government’s proposed water planning measures.

Local Federal Riverina MP Michael McCormack attended the meeting as did NSW Nationals Senator, Fiona Nash.

Mr McCormack said he was proud of the Griffith community.

“They’ve turned out en masse, in force, united, true and solid and they have given the Minister and the Authority Chairman, an unequivocal message that no-one will pull the economic rug out from underneath this region,” he said.

“It’s high time this government started listening to regional Australians and started taking heed of what they say.

“We all like to eat but these Green based policies are not helping those who grow the food to feed this nation and keep thousands of rural communities alive.”

Griffith rice farmer John Casserly has been farming in the region since 1953 and said he saw the draft Plan as a major threat to his future by proposing to slash irrigation water by about 30 percent which would decimate primary production in the southern Basin community.

Mr Casserly said he wore a black arm band to show the region was “mortally wounded” and facing “potential death”, with lower water entitlements in future.

“I don’t think they’ve got it right,” he said of the draft Plan.

“I’m expecting a few answers.

“There’s still a long way to go; we’ve got 20 weeks consultation and adjustment and the plan doesn’t come into play until 2019.

“But the NSW Liberal government can still block the plan and will certainly come into play in a big way, if they don’t like it.”

Opposition leader Tony Abbott received a rock-star reception from a fired up crowd.

He was loudly applauded and cheered when he entered the meeting, when he spoke and also when he departed, albeit early.

In contrast, Federal Water Minister Tony Burke was jeered as he walked in the front entrance with one person yelling, “Get out of here; go home”.

The audience regularly interjected when he spoke and booed when answering questions on the government’s plan.

As the Minister tried to explain the reasons for his presence at the meeting to hear the different community views, one audience member yelled, “That’s bullshit – you don’t listen” and another accused him of only attending to “Get your photo taken”.

A mock coffin was carried into the meeting saying, “RIP Basin Communities” but overall the crowd’s behaviour was largely kept in check with no repeat of last year’s wild scenes where copies of the Guide to a draft Basin Plan were burnt and a mock horse’s head was thrown onto the stage.

Rankin Springs farmers, Jock Munro and Andrew Ryan said the government was showing contempt for farmers and breeding business “insecurity” by planning to radically reduce water for primary production, which was the community’s lifeblood.

Mr Ryan said Mr Burke was also responsible for deregulating the bulk wheat export market which also removed business certainty and confidence.

“Every time it’s Tony Burke; when are they going to stop,” he said.

Mr Abbott said the Basin was home to two million people and produced 40 per cent of Australia’s agricultural output as the nation’s food bowl and potentially the Asia’s food bowl.

“…we want to ensure that it continues to be the greatest food producing area of our country,” he said.

“Food security is an increasing issue in the modern world and we won’t have food security if we don’t also have water security.”

Mr Abbott said one aspect of the Murray-Darling Basin debate that has upset him is that the “whole tenor of so much of our conversation in Canberra” has been an assumption that somehow the country’s farmers, foresters and fishermen are against the environment.

“Wrong,” he said.

“The farmers of this country are the best environmentalists, the best conservationists that we have.

“You live off the land you know that you have got to protect the land because if you don’t look after the land there’s no more living for you; there’s no more living for your children and your grandchildren.

“If there is one group in this country who have a commitment to continuity, who have a commitment to doing the right thing by future generations, it is the farmers of this country and the farmers of the Murray-Darling Basin.

“You’re trying to practise the best possible environmental farming methods and we should try to put more water into the river for environmental purposes but we can’t put more water into the river for environmental purposes in ways that destroy your livelihoods and damage these communities.

“I think we can get significant amounts of water back into the river and we can do that by actually intelligently spending the $5.4 billion I think it is that the Howard Government put aside for infrastructure improvements.”

Mr Abbott said the Coalition would not support a bad plan and wanted a plan that secured the future of rural communities and provided certainty.

He also acknowledged Mr Burke for “having the guts to turn up”.

He said, “you’ve got to respect a bloke who is prepared to turn up and face what he knows is going to be a hostile audience”.

“In the end, what we have all got to understand is that for you in this room and for the people living throughout the basin, water is life,” he said.

“You have a stake in this system in a way that, dare I say it, Bob Brown and his colleagues in Canberra just don’t and that’s why it is important that this government spends more time listening to people like you and less time being dictated to by Bob Brown and the Greens.”

Griffith City Council Mayor Mike Neville said the political elephant in the room was in South Australia where politics was central to their attitude towards water planning reforms.

But he said, “we have to take the politics out of it” to ensure the future of rural communities and food security.

MDBA Chairman Craig Knowles promised to keep working with Basin communities once the crowd had dispersed and the media had gone but warned, simply rejecting the Plan “won’t make the problem go away”.

He said there was a wide range of views within the river system, including irrigation communities who say, “one drop of water’s too much” and environmentalists who believe 4000 gigalitres should be the minimum volume of Sustainable Diversion Limits and not the draft Plan’s proposed 2750GL.

Mr Burke said there was a range of views on the Plan throughout the different Basin communities.

But he said he wanted a Plan that resolved many of the river system’s long term problems.

He said a Basin Plan would be presented before parliament next year but so far, the Greens were the only party that have said they will vote against it.

Members of the Griffith business community spoke to the meeting and said the proposed water cuts would see the gross value of irrigated production drop by $300 million a year, resulting in thousands of jobs lost and “enormous” flow on impacts for the local community.

They also spoke about some of the immediate impacts of the government’s water planning processes, creating genuine business uncertainty and reduced farm-land and residential property values.

“Once productive capacity is taken away with this plan, it’s lost forever,” said Les Worland, president of the Riverina Winemakers Association.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Great meeting, great turnout. Griffith isn't central Sydney, Canberra or Adelaide where GetUp can send CBD office workers a turn up here at lunchtime Tweet or Email and loosely claim to have 8000 at an Enviro rally
Posted by PetefromHay, 15/12/2011 3:01:03 PM
Yesterdays meeting was a farce. Burke and Knowles only heard what they wanted to hear . They couldnt even answer the right questions. Ask them how the government trading water is good for the environment !. So they strip it off farmers to sell to the highest bidder ,.Wake up australia before its too late
Posted by john bisetto, 16/12/2011 5:20:30 AM
Well, Knowles is a political fixer not someone focussed on giving a fair go all round within the boundaries of the Water Act, and Burke is only there because he couldn't have survived not being around twice over.

But what's the problem, really? All the irrigator AGW denialists are saying the last decade has been one of drought, meaning that it will break, then we'll all be back to the good times. If they do actually believe that, then the water itself will be returning - once the drought breaks.

Unless very good at the loaves and fishes, you can't take water that isn't

there.

Posted by R.Ambrose Raven, 16/12/2011 8:29:05 AM
There is a lot more to Basin issues than water totals. Any good approach, especially good day-to-day water management, requires a well-funded Authority with skilled, specialised, permanent employees and a strong emphasis on balancing irrigators, urban needs, the science, and the whole system.

Yet, greatly helped by farmers and the NFF, the Laberals have worked hard for decades to destroy such a public service, starting with Hawke in 1984. Politicians aren’t out to do the best for the Basin, but to do a fix.

Posted by R.Ambrose Raven, 16/12/2011 8:29:58 AM
This government has done severe damage to Australia's wheat industry and now this half baked water plan looks to be another failing. Time for an election to get rid of these morons ....
Posted by MD, 16/12/2011 8:36:26 AM
Governments can't be trusted,they listen but still carry out the draft in its original form. I have given up going to meetings on water,tree clearing,reef quality etc.etc. as it is a total waste of time.In my experience they pretend to listen,take away a huge pile of butchers paper and have a bonfire with it,then implement the draft after saying they "consulted widely".
Posted by Jude, 16/12/2011 9:01:35 AM
MD, we had an election last year. Do you propose we keep having elections until we voters get it "right"?
Posted by Bushie Bill, 16/12/2011 9:59:11 AM
R. Ambrose Raven, it might pay to work with some facts. Hawke was elected in 1983. He was from the Labor party. Sucessive governments of every persuasion, including Rudd and Gillard have added to the public service. The MDBA has over 250 staff, and spends well over $250m. More than twenty years of work have delivered the hopeless mess that is the subject or community anger now. The plan for taking 2750GL is on top of the 1200GL taken to date, 100% from irrigators - not one ML from green groups, GetUp! or other assorted lobbyists. Worst of all - it will not "fix" the MBDA.
Posted by ME Again, 16/12/2011 10:38:46 AM
Most of these comments appear to come from people who dont think or read. or are just ignorant. If water is not available to meet allocations there has to be rationing. Just ask anyone who has had an irrigation allocation/ licence over the last ten years.

Allowing limited flows to be diverted for irrigation during severe droughts will result in the distruction of the total basin environment, most people know and acknowledge this fact.

All sides of politics know they must act, political opportunisn is not a solution as the coalition will soon find out.

Posted by Bazza, 16/12/2011 10:53:32 AM
By allowing wheat farmers to decide for themselves to whom they would sell their wheat,Tony Burke restored their property rights.Something they had been denied for 70 years.Now he proposes to allocate water, in the MDB ,by purely political criteria, denying security to water allocations for irrigators in perpetuity.Instead of criticising his decision to respect farmers property rights in their wheat,Burke should be asked to apply the same principles to irrigators.. National socialists like Jock Munro ,undermine the irrigation farmers' just cause.Jock prefers a Fuhrer to Commissar in control
Posted by diesel head, 16/12/2011 11:14:39 AM
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
15 December, 2011
03 December, 2011
15 December, 2011
POLL
Q: Do you think consumers in general believe farmers don't produce food ethically?

Yes - consumers in general don't trust farmers
(32%)

No - consumers in general understand modern farming practices
(30.2%)

Somewhere in between
(37.7%)

Total Votes: 506
Poll Date: 12 December, 2011

Most popular articles

Advertisement



The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...