News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Greens blast Land and Water Australia shut down 

Greens blast Land and Water Australia shut down

08 May, 2009 06:03 PM
THE AUSTRALIAN Greens have condemned moves by the Rudd Government to shut down the Land and Water Australia (LWA) rural research and development corporation.

It's more evidence that the Government is "totally clueless" on natural resource management and sustainable agriculture, the Greens say.

"Land and Water Australia is one of the few sources of funding for essential research into tackling some of Australia's biggest environmental problems," according to Senator Rachel Siewert.

"And it has been engaging farmers in managing the health of our soil, water and remnant native vegetation.

"Shutting down LWA will cut the legs out from under a whole string of ongoing research projects where LWA is one of the funding partners.

"For a significant amount of this research, extension and technology transfer there is no-one else to turn to for funding and support.

"Projects include crucial work that focuses on helping farmers manage climate variability, tackling growing problems with environmental weeds, sustainable irrigation practices and managing biodiversity and native vegetation in mixed landscapes.

"Ministers Tony Burke and Peter Garrett clearly do not understand the significance of the crucial gaps in our knowledge in sustainable agriculture and natural resource management.

"With many of the serious problems that the Caring for Our Country program aspires to address, there simply isn't the knowledge base or sustainable farming systems available to sustain or remediate threatened landscapes.

"LWA's current work on seasonal forecasting and agricultural productivity in the WA wheatbelt is (an example) - absolutely crucial to the ongoing viability of our regional towns and our food security.

"This move is a yet another step backwards for natural resource management in Australia.

"This further reduces our scientific capacity to mitigate and adapt to the threats climate change poses to our environment and our way of life in our hour of need.

"With all the Rudd Government rhetoric about evidence-based policy, Burke and Garrett should be backing science, not slashing it."

Another blast has come from Professor David Brunckhorst, director of the Institute for Rural Futures at, University of New England, which has led several LWA-funded research projects.

“Research funded by LWA has delivered innovative, practical and real results to farmers and landmanagers across Australia," he says.

"Clearly not all the answers have been found. Accelerating declines of the environment, the production base, water quality and availability and globalclimate change are crucial issues we face as a nation.

"By abolishing LWA, the government will be compounding social and ecological debt, leaving us with an inability to cope with future change.”

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1


comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
The Greens should spend some time examining what contribution Land and Water Australia (LWA) made to rural science. They will find nothing but wasted public monies. LWA was behind a flawed salinity science that resulted in $1.3B being spent on dehydrating the Australian landscape with groundwater pumping and drainage channels. It squandered the first $5M allocated to a Healthy Soils program in about 2003 with 1/3rd to administration and the rest to public salaries for routine soils training. LWA just circulated public monies around other public agencies and had no interest in the work of private industry scientists or their innovation. Eliminating LWA is a step in the right direction to refocus public science to the common good of industry and the community, rather than the self-serving interests of public scientists.
Posted by Mangiri, 11/05/2009 8:40:40 AM
That's assuming that it's being replaced with something else. Or is the money just going back to consolidated revenue? If the government is making a change to where the research money is going then good - but why don't they come out and say it.
Posted by David, 11/05/2009 10:03:30 AM
Well you can say goodbye to any biodiversity related research by the 'other' R&D agencies. If it wasn't for LWW there wouldn't have been a biodiversity project for Australia's sheep graziers or for mixed farming systems. There is no 'research' in Caring for Country. So all the frutiful relationships, the collaborations, the capacity building, between farmers, regional catchment authorities and researchers that have developed from programs like LWW and Grain & Graze will be left stranded. Working towards understanding, maintaining and recreating (where possible) a 'healthy' landscape is for the 'common good' of industry and community.
Posted by researcher, 11/05/2009 11:10:51 AM
Land & Water Australia consistently delivered returns on public investment in rural R&D that were the envy of many R&D corporations. It played an essential coordinating role in managing jointly-funded R&D programs on priority areas such as dryland salinity, climate variability, native vegetation management and water-use efficiency by irrigators just to name a few. The demise of Land & Water Australia is short-sighted and is robbing the future (where R&D is focused) to pay the present.
Posted by Glenn, 11/05/2009 11:21:33 AM
When are we (rural australia) going to stand up for what is right? We just continue to take these funding cuts and urban centric policy decisions. NFF where are you in this debate? A press release after the event seems like reactionary tactics. Where was the lobbying prior to the budget being drafted? Agriculture in Australia is well on its way to becoming an endangered species and with it goes our ground troops for the climate change battle. How can this government pretend to be climate savvy when they are implementing policy that ultimately means food must be imported rather than locally provided.
Posted by David, 13/05/2009 8:47:20 AM
David's words are the most profound. We need the kind of organisation that L&W provides. We need leadership and direction and philosophy to make sense of the future.

There can be no denying that an investment framework extending beyond traditional public agency based research is required, and we should work at this. Getting rid of L&W is not the answer.

For now, we should write to our local papers and our politicians to make them aware of the injustice they do to all Australians through this decision.

Posted by Phil, 7/06/2009 12:08:56 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Land and Water Australia is set to be dismantled.
Land and Water Australia is set to be dismantled.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
07 May, 2009
08 May, 2009
POLL
Q: Has the swine flu outbreak caused you to reconsider your consumption of pork products?

Yes
(6.9%)

No
(93.1%)

Total Votes: 580
Poll Date: 03 May, 2009

Most popular articles

SPRAY AWARDS NEWS MREC



The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...