News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Greenhouse burial trial a success: scientists 

Greenhouse burial trial a success: scientists

20 Apr, 2009 06:27 AM
VICTORIA'S potential role in developing divisive "clean coal" technology will be underlined this week when scientists announce 50,000 tonnes of greenhouse gas has been successfully stored underground in the Otway Basin.

The news comes a year after Australia's first greenhouse burial trial began removing naturally occurring gas from a well, compressing it into a liquid and injecting it in a depleted gas field more than two kilometres beneath farmland.

The revelation coincides with State Government scientists releasing preliminary results that suggest Gippsland's offshore geology is well suited to storing greenhouse gas released during coal-fired electricity generation in the Latrobe Valley.

Peter Cook, chief executive of the Co-operative Research Centre for Greenhouse Gas Technologies, said that while there had been minor equipment problems, the most crucial aspects of the Western District trial were working.

"When it comes to the really important stuff of 'has it stayed in the ground, has it behaved as we expected?' then the answer is unequivocally yes," he said.

The announcement comes after Prime Minister Kevin Rudd last week launched the Global Carbon Capture and Storage Institute, a Canberra-based body charged with determining if the technology will be commercially viable.

Governments and industry are pinning their hopes on clean coal playing a central role in tackling climate change, but progress has been slow.

Even under a best-case scenario, experts say it will be at least a decade before it is commercially available.

Dr Cook said not enough was being done. "I think we've got a window of opportunity here and that window will narrow if we don't act," he said.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Quote; "When it comes to the really important stuff of 'has it stayed in the ground, has it behaved as we expected?' then the answer is unequivocally yes," he said. Unquote. Unequivocally Yes??? After only 12 months of underground storage. Don't forget, in geological time scales, that equates to a millisecond. How are they going to reassure the locals that a catastrophic eruption of gas to the atmosphere won't occur as a result of a shift of the earth's crust through an earthquake or similar event. Don't forget what happened to all the animal life forms around that lake in Cameroon W Africa back in the eighties when a massive amount of co2 erupted from the lake there and over 1800 people suffocated in their sleep. Be damned if I would have that stuff buried below my farm.
Posted by Trugger, 20/04/2009 5:45:18 PM
So the trial has been going on for 12 months & has been classed an unequivocal success? As a scientist I consider that the timeframes have been too short & these results need to be treated with caution. The technique is a bandaid solution & energy from renewable & green sources need to be promoted. Economics always gets in the way of truly sustainable living.
Posted by dr po, 21/04/2009 8:44:15 AM
Carbon sequestration is a joke, it is dealing with a symptom and not the cause. So it was an unequivocal success for 50,000 tonnes, the average coal fired power station pumps out 20 million tonnes of CO2. How cost effective or successful is it going to be at full scale? Why isn't this type of investment going into truly renewable or lower emitting fossil fuels like gas? Coal fired stations only pay $0.06 cents per MW of tax whereas cleaner gas - $1.06 per MW. Stop the easier option and blind support of coal and implement some long term solutions.
Posted by Carbon Burial Joke, 21/04/2009 9:06:17 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
17 April, 2009
16 April, 2009
POLL
Q: Do you think tree changers generally have realistic expectations of rural life when they move to the bush?

Yes
(9.8%)

No
(89%)

Other
(1.2%)

Total Votes: 764
Poll Date: 19 April, 2009

Most popular articles

Advertisement



The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...