News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 'Greener' ag land better for climate change 

'Greener' ag land better for climate change

09 Nov, 2009 03:04 PM
MOST land use changes occurring in the continental United States reduce vegetative cover and raise regional surface temperatures, according to a new study by scientists at Purdue University, the University of Maryland and the University of Colorado-Boulder.

The study, which will appear in the Royal Meteorological Society's International Journal of Climatology, found that almost any change that makes land cover less "green" contributes to warming.

However, a less obvious finding is that the conversion of any land to agricultural use results in cooling - even land that was previously forested.

This suggests that local and regional strategies such as creating green spaces and buffer zones in and around urban areas could be a tool to use in addressing climate change.

It is also further evidence that land use should be better incorporated into computer models projecting future climate conditions, said Purdue doctoral student Souleymane Fall, the article's lead author.

"What we highlight here is that a significant trend, particularly the warming trend in terms of temperatures, can also be partially explained by land use change," said Dev Niyogi, a Purdue earth and atmospheric sciences and agronomy professor and the Indiana state climatologist.

Niyogi and Fall said the idea that land use helps drive climate change has been poorly understood compared to factors such as greenhouse gas emissions.

"People realise that land use cover also is an important force - and not only at the local but also at the regional scale," said Fall, whose doctoral research focuses on the impacts of land surface properties on near-surface temperature trends.

The researchers used higher-resolution temperature data than previous studies, meaning the data were more detailed, Niyogi said.

They also employed dynamic data on land use changes from 1992 to 2001 that were derived from satellite imagery.

Among the study's findings:

  • In general, the greener the land cover, the cooler the surface temperature.

  • Conversion to agricultural use results in cooling, while conversion from agricultural use generally results in warming.
  • Deforestation generally results in warming, with the exception of a shift from forest to agriculture. No clear picture emerged from the impact of planting or seeding new forests.
  • Urbanisation and conversion to bare soils have the largest warming impacts.
  • In general, land use conversion often results in more warming than cooling.

    The study took an approach called observation minus re-analysis.

    Through this process, the researchers used temperature data from local ground observations, observation and computer modeling, Geographic Information Systems and statistical methods.

    They were able to separate the effects of land use or cover from greenhouse warming and isolate the impact from each land use or cover type.

    The more detailed data provided a clearer picture of the effects of land surface properties on near-surface temperature trends.

    "We found that most land use changes, especially urbanisation, result in warming," said Eugenia Kalnay, University of Maryland professor of atmospheric and oceanic sciences and one of the study's co-authors.

    "A clear exception is conversion of land from other uses to agriculture, which produces relative cooling, presumably because of increased evaporation."

    While the effects of greenhouses gases like carbon dioxide are clear, Kalnay said the study does suggest that land use also needs to be considered carefully.

    Another study co-author, Roger Pielke Sr, a senior research scientist in atmospheric and oceanic sciences at the University of Colorado-Boulder, said the results indicate that "unless these landscape effects are properly considered, the role of greenhouse warming in increasing surface temperatures will be significantly overstated".

    More to climate change

    Until recently, most scientists have viewed human-induced changes (warming) in climate as primarily the result of increasing concentrations of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases.

    However, the current paper is the latest of a number of studies in recent years to shed light on the climate impact of land cover change.

    These finding don't negate the effects of greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide, according to Kalnay.

    "I think that greenhouse warming is incredibly important, but land use should not be neglected. It clearly contributes to warming, especially in urban and arid areas," she said.

    Print
    Increase Text Size
    Decrease Text Size

    comments


    Date: Newest first | Oldest first
    That should baffle the doomsayers - some interesting science - they should all sell up, abandon the cities and go farming.
    Posted by AJ, 10/11/2009 9:56:27 AM
    Oh no, don't tell me that farming contributes to global cooling. Better stop them before we plummet into the next ice age - it is coming you know!!!! So concrete jungles contribute to warming and large amounts of greenhouse gases. But wait, there are a lot of votes in them jungles. Hmmm, how will that be spun to hide the truth?
    Posted by The orchardist, 10/11/2009 10:01:52 AM
    Restoring degraded grazing land is one of the most powerful and effective means immediately available for us to address climate change. Not only does it sequester massive amounts of carbon back into our soils, where it is an asset and not a "pollutant", but it also impacts on the water cycle and now this recognition that it has geo-engineering benefits. Forget the "white roofs" and "solar umbrella" schemes - just reward our farmers for good grazing management and get even better results for less money. Green grass is 60% more reflective than bare soil, and with some 5 billion hectares of degraded grasslands on our planet, restoring this much land would really tip the scales in our favour.
    Posted by soil carbon, 10/11/2009 10:10:30 AM
    Fantastic! Another opportunity for a tax. However, this time it would be a fair one, on the real cause of human effect warming, ie rising population and urbanisation of society. The sleeping bogey man that is also kept quiet is globalisation with the high rate of shipping goods around the world. If all goods were produced locally and only surpluses transported, there would be one massive reduction in greenhouse gases. Let's focus on the root causes for once, nar, futile, but at least for 10 seconds.
    Posted by denis, 10/11/2009 10:53:16 AM
    Hmmn, dude gets a PhD for confirming something farmers have known all along. It is welcome research, if only to remove one extra layer of ignorance from the minds of the metrocentrics. The fact that most of the recorded surface temperature change was the result of an urban bias in the temperature stations is not new. The fact that the "climate muddles" did not take surface change impacts into account is also not new, to us sceptics anyway. It is more evidence of biased treatment of farming and land use issues by the climate malignerati. They earnestly model the impact of a short lived addition to a trace gas on heat retention but completely ignore the role of a permanent increase in evaporative cooling. So let's spell this out once more for the eco-plodders: 1. Bare earth warms faster than vegetated ground, especially in winter. It gets the soil microbes working earlier, increases soil fertility, gets the crop up faster and might show up as a slight but unambiguously beneficial rise in spring and autumn temperatures. 2. Grazed pasture uses soil moisture more slowly than tall grass or tree cover. So evaporative cooling continues for longer after each rainfall event. It's cool, man.
    Posted by Ian Mott, 10/11/2009 11:07:19 AM
    Clive Mcalpine did some research on the effect of land clearing and increases in surface temperatures in the Murray Darling Basin. The conclusion was that there was a correlation between a 2 degree rise in surface temperature attributed to removal of vegetation cover. We have the city folk up in arms about a 2 degree rise in global temperatures when we can fix it now with the technology we have and not a word. If the city folk are prepared to break up the supermarket duopoly and take the hit on their super and to pay farmers to properly maintain their properties, we could alleviate the up to 2 degrees of warming in the MDB without an ETS. But where is the money from the government? Billions to the coal industry and SFA to landholders. Who needs power when you have nothing to cook?
    Posted by the lorax, 10/11/2009 11:43:56 AM

    post a comment


    Screen name  *
    Email address  *
    Remember me?
    Comment  *
     
    We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
    This map shows observation minus re-analysis trends in the continental US from 1979 to 2003. The trends are associated with land use and changes in land use. Researchers from Purdue and the universities of Colorado and Maryland conducted a study showing land use can affect surface temperatures locally and regionally. Units are in degrees Celsius per decade. Photo: Purdue University/Souleymane Fall
    This map shows observation minus re-analysis trends in the continental US from 1979 to 2003. The trends are associated with land use and changes in land use. Researchers from Purdue and the universities of Colorado and Maryland conducted a study showing land use can affect surface temperatures locally and regionally. Units are in degrees Celsius per decade. Photo: Purdue University/Souleymane Fall
    Related Coverage
    ARTICLES
    MULTIMEDIA
    06 November, 2009
    09 November, 2009
    POLL
    Q: Has the emissions trading debate changed your voting intentions?

    More likely to vote Labor
    (10.5%)

    More likely to vote Coalition
    (47.2%)

    Less likely to vote Labor
    (12%)

    Less likely to vote Coalition
    (3.2%)

    No change
    (21.8%)

    Other
    (5.4%)

    Total Votes: 685
    Poll Date: 08 November, 2009

    Most popular articles

    ELDERS NEWS MREC SJ



    The Land







    Weather brought to you by:

    Weatherzone

    Classifieds

    Front Page

    Current Issue
    Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
     SEND...
     SAVE...
     SHARE...