News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Great Southern case takes another twist 

Great Southern case takes another twist

10 Dec, 2009 01:46 PM
A FINANCIAL planner who earned steep upfront commissions for investing his clients' funds into Great Southern, the agribusiness that collapsed amid irregularities in its accounts, is fighting in court to stop Bendigo and Adelaide Bank from putting his clients' details on a credit agency blacklist.

The Australian Financial Review reports that Stephen Navra, of Navra Financial Services, has asked the NSW Supreme Court to prevent Bendigo Bank from telling credit agencies that 273 clients of his financial planning firm have stopped repaying their bank loans.

The loans were taken out to invest in Great Southern's managed investment schemes but the collapse of the agribusiness means many investors have stopped paying.

Mr Navra's lawyers will argue the bank loans are unenforceable because they are tainted by misrepresentations made by Great Southern.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size


comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
I agree. GS have mislead many investors and always commented on how the loans were limited recourse over the agriculture project itself. Anyone with a GS loan should not have to pay it back if the project/asset no longer exists..
Posted by sydney, 11/12/2009 10:07:01 AM
Sorry Mr Navra. If I borrow money to buy a house and it burns down, if I am not insured it's my loss and I still have to pay it back. Did you not inform your clients that loan insurance is a wise investment on any large sum of money? As a shareholder and client of B&A Bank the money that the bank lent is "My Money Ralph" and I expect that the bank will do whatever it takes to recoup their losses.
Posted by she's my ute, 11/12/2009 1:20:17 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
09 December, 2009
10 December, 2009
POLL
Q: Which do you think is the best method for reducing Australia's carbon emissions?

Emissions Trading Scheme
(8.7%)

Carbon Tax
(11.7%)

Laws regulating behaviour
(7.7%)

Direct Govt investment in renewable energy
(42.9%)

Direct Govt payments for emissions reductions
(5.2%)

None of the above
(23.8%)

Total Votes: 762
Poll Date: 06 December, 2009

Most popular articles

Advertisement



The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...