News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Full carbon cycle must be recognised: NSW Farmers 

Full carbon cycle must be recognised: NSW Farmers

30 Jul, 2008 02:56 PM
The NSW Farmers' Association will urge the Federal Government to ensure that any accounting system applying to agriculture under the Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme takes into account the full carbon cycle, including all emissions and sequestration.

Speaking from the Association's annual conference in Sydney, president Jock Laurie said the National Greenhouse Gas Inventory is based on Kyoto greenhouse gas accounting methodology.

"This represents the Government's current view of agricultural emissions, but they incorrectly describe this data as 'net' amounts," Mr Laurie said.

"The accounting construct doesn't include agricultural sinks such as the sequestration that continually occurs in soil and groundcover.

"When you try and account for the emissions from cattle, you should also consider that the grass and grain these animals live on are carbon sinks."

NSW Farmers', via the National Farmers Federation, has lobbied the Federal government about the general need to improve carbon accounting for agriculture so as to reward sequestration and to accurately reflect the net position.

"NSW farmers are committed to finding workable new ways to reduce the sector's carbon footprint and ways farmers can adopt solutions to build on our leading contribution to reducing emissions on an equitable basis, but it does need to be equitable," Mr Laurie said.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Wool is 50pc carbon. Will Kevin Rudd pay us for that sequestration?

Forestry is included for sequestration, but the timber and woody weeds that farmers and graziers are unable to clear because of Labor legislation isn't to be included.

It's quite simple.vLabor wants to kill off rural Australia. They're just The Greens under another name.

Man-made global warming is not proven. Climate has varied on this planet since the beginning of time.

What ended the Ice Ages? Was it fossil fuels? Government policy?

And what impact will Australia's ETS make? Less than 1pc, while our trading partners laugh at our self-imposed stupidity.

Posted by Brindi, 30/07/2008 8:33:30 PM
With more and more real scientists pointing out that the "science" of Global Warming Climate Change is only hypothesis, not science, and that the billions of dollars spent by governments to try to establish a link between global warming and carbon emissions have still not found any evidence to support this hypothesis, I am still hoping that before 2010 truth will prevail.

Meanwhile, I have worked out the cause of the confusion: air conditioning.

Very large numbers of the population now spend so much of their time in climate controlled buildings and vehicles that when they then step out into the open air it feels like the climate has changed. This leads them to believe the nonsense.

Posted by Ted O'Brien, 2/08/2008 8:16:05 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
POLL
Q: Did you support the striking truck drivers?

Yes - they need fairer conditions
(80.7%)

No - they have disrupted business
(12%)

Undecided - more information needed
(7.3%)

Total Votes: 777
Poll Date: 28 July, 2008

Most popular articles

ELDERS NEWS MREC SJ



The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...