News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Fifth hottest year for planet Earth 

Fifth hottest year for planet Earth

09 Dec, 2009 05:23 AM
AUSTRALIA will record its third warmest year on record in 2009, and the planet its fifth, according to data collected by the World Meteorological Organisation.

The annual analysis found the 2000s were warmer than the 1990s, which were warmer than the 1980s, challenging claims that the globe has cooled in recent years.

Only North America had a cooler-than-average year in 2009. Large parts of southern Asia and central Africa are expected to have their hottest year ever.

Arctic sea ice - often at the centre of the debate about global warming - is at its third lowest level since detailed measurement began 30 years ago. The lowest level was in 2007.

''Every summer the amount of Arctic ice is getting very low,'' World Meteorological Organisation secretary-general Michel Jarraud said in Copenhagen.

In Australia, the year was marked by three ''exceptional heatwaves'', including the wilting south-eastern summer that culminated in the Black Saturday bushfires that killed 173 people.

Victoria recorded its highest ever temperature - 48.8 degrees.

Heatwaves were also recorded in the south-east in November and on the subtropical east coast in August.

Winter was exceptionally mild over most of the continent, with maximum temperatures 6 to 7 degrees above average in some places.

Northern Australia, however, recorded a cooler-than-average summer, with some sites recording temperatures be-tween 3 and 4 degrees below average.

The data behind the report was drawn from the various national meteorological and hydrological services of 189 countries.

It was analysed separately by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration in the United States, NASA's Goddard Institute of Space Studies and Britain's Hadley Centre in partnership with the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia.

A final version of the 2009 weather data will be published in March.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Statements about sea ice records for 30 years, fifth hottest year and so on show how little we know about the Earth's changing climate. Records that were kept in the past were only in populated centers which did not reflect a true picture, now there are remote sensors everywhere giving a more accurate picture which does not necessarily mean that things have changed as dramatically as made out. It is strange that KRudd and those at the climate conference do not bring up the fact that the earth's population must be controlled, the only country that does this is China. With the demands of higher population on energy, cars, manufactured goods etc, it would seem logical that this would be the starting point. Unfortunately logic does not enter the climate debate being driven by money, Rudd TAX, Al Gore trading permits and all the other entrepreneurs looking for a quick buck.
Posted by jerangle, 9/12/2009 7:24:50 AM
Good sense from Jerangle ... not many people see the importance of population. "It would seem logical that this would be the starting point ..." says Jerangle, quite rightly. But tell that to the business community ("more people means more customers!"). Tell that to the incredibly short-sighted housing industry. Tell that to the conservation organisations. Tell that to the political parties, left or right. Sorry, population is a hot potato which we're not ready to pick up ... while the entrepreneurs go on looking for a quick buck, business as usual, and (the evidence suggests) the planet warms up. There is a small international science-based group at Copenhagen who are trying to get population on to the agenda, with so far little success. The potato is too hot.
Posted by nico, 10/12/2009 6:14:38 AM
I love these quotes, they are priceless and obviously you can sell lots of papers with them. Is there any wonder there are people out there that have no idea what is really going on. A question for Adam, your headline says the 5th hottest year - since when? Can you tell me what the average temperature was in Australia in 1554, or 1112, or 948, or 12BC, how do those averages stack up? Oh and if you can't give me Australia's average then can you provide the world average temperature for those years? And the other thing, when I was growing up a heat wave required that the temperature went above 100F, now it is above 35C which is only 95F, is this in part why we are having more heatwaves? Have a nice day folks.
Posted by katandra, 10/12/2009 6:36:08 AM
Does anyone believe this stuff anymore?
Posted by jaimie, 10/12/2009 7:24:12 AM
jerangle... do you have a primary source for your claims? Or is this merely your opinion? According to the Goddard Institute, there has already been an adjustment for Urban Heat Island effect, but they have found that city weather stations are not necessarily recording warmer temps than country ones.
Posted by GT, 10/12/2009 7:45:11 AM
Hansen's Goddard Institute has been just as recalcitrant in providing source data as the Hadley Centre. They have the same MO and have been doing the same sort of data manipulation to the Urban Heat Island effect. The adjustment they made was nowhere near adequate. see http://climateaudit.org/2007/02/19/jones-russian-uhi-study/ And who could miss the "big lie" straw man in the article. Claims of global cooling have only been in respect of very modest cooling since the 1998 peak. But the climatistas have implied that someone is out there claiming the whole decade is cooler than the previous one. And they then trumpet the data as if it refutes some central sceptic argument. The facts remain that under the GW theory there should not be any decade long intervals without increases to trend but that is what has taken place. An absence of temperature increase is an absence of warming. And some localised temperature rises do not constitute evidence of global warming in the absence of planetary scale warming.
Posted by Ian Mott, 10/12/2009 9:02:41 AM
GT, it still does not hide the fact that accurate records have only been kept for the last 30 years and all the fiddling of past records are as good as the person creating the computer program. As for the headline 'fifth hottest year', when is this true for, last 30 years, 50 years or 100 years?
Posted by jerangle, 10/12/2009 9:12:42 AM
This information in this article appears to be as manipulated as the CRU data. I am from the WA wheatbelt. I am now wearing a jumper. I had one on yesterday. The weather has been quite mild. To say this is the fifth hottest year on record is complete bull$@#t.
Posted by Len, 10/12/2009 10:40:08 AM
I am sure the aborigines who walked between Victoria and Tasmania during the last ice age would agree that it is hotter now than it was then. This is just redicilous scare mongering. It is the climate advocates that have reduced this debate to a low level. The sceptics just want a reasoned argument about facts. It is the pro-climate change lobby (everyone agrees the climate is warming) that vilifies anyone with a different opinion. On reflection, I guess that just confirms they are scientists, because that is the way true scientists have treated anyone with the slightest doubt of their credentials for centuries now.
Posted by denis, 10/12/2009 10:41:25 AM
It seems to me strange to say accurate records have only been kept for the past 30 years. I'm sure many country Post Offices were recording temperature every 4 hrs for a lot longer than that. If you want to see if non urban weather stations are recording temp increases I suggest you vsit CO2science.com
Posted by The Quiet Farmer, 10/12/2009 3:26:00 PM
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
07 December, 2009
08 December, 2009
POLL
Q: Which do you think is the best method for reducing Australia's carbon emissions?

Emissions Trading Scheme
(8.7%)

Carbon Tax
(11.7%)

Laws regulating behaviour
(7.7%)

Direct Govt investment in renewable energy
(42.9%)

Direct Govt payments for emissions reductions
(5.2%)

None of the above
(23.8%)

Total Votes: 762
Poll Date: 06 December, 2009

Most popular articles

Advertisement



The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...