News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Fielding urges delay on emissions trading 

Fielding urges delay on emissions trading

12 Mar, 2009 04:29 PM
The Government's chances of getting its emissions trading system through the Senate by the middle of the year, took another hit when the Family First senator Steve Fielding confirmed that he believed the scheme should be delayed.

All the cross-party senators, as well as the Opposition, have now said they will not pass the legislation in its current form, leaving the Government scrambling to secure the scheme's future.

Senator Fielding said yesterday that the scheme should be put back by at least six months: "We don't want to see jobs booted offshore. That would be crazy, especially in these economic times."

He was also concerned that it did not recognise voluntary action taken by households, such as recycling, or programs that allow people to pay more for their energy to come from renewable sources.

Yesterday the Senate approved two inquiries into the legislation. One was put forward by the Government.

The other was proposed by the Greens and the Coalition and will look at whether emissions trading is the most cost-effective way of reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

The argument about the composition of the inquiry's committee is a demonstration of how hard it will be for the Government to get its legislation through the upper house.

There is one spot on the committee for an independent.

Both the Independent Nick Xenophon and Senator Fielding believe they should have the position.

If they are unable to agree, the Senate will have to hold a formal vote on who should sit on the committee.

The Government says the trading scheme will create thousands of jobs in an expanding renewable energy sector.

It predicts jobs in that area will grow 30-fold by 2050.

But this does not seem to have persuaded Senator Fielding or Senator Xenophon, who worry about job losses as a result of the higher costs faced by industry.

The Greens and the Coalition said this week they would not vote for the scheme without significant amendments.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
And what will the taxes raised by this stupid scheme be spent on? By increasing the cost of our food, our warmth in winter, the cost of our water reticulation, getting the kids to school, what is it that the "champion of the poor", the ALP, hope to achieve?

And who will benefit from this scheme based on such flawed science? The rich, that invest in carbon sequestration schemes! Man-made climate change is charlatan science.

Posted by Brindi, 12/03/2009 7:47:18 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Family First Senator Steve Fielding.
Family First Senator Steve Fielding.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
POLL
Q: Do you support SA Premier Mike Rann's High Court challenge to force the removal of water trading caps in the Murray Darling Basin?

Yes
(41.6%)

No
(47.1%)

Undecided
(11.2%)

Total Votes: 490
Poll Date: 08 March, 2009

Most popular articles

Advertisement



The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...