News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Fears of lasting harm ended Spencer's strike 

Fears of lasting harm ended Spencer's strike

14 Jan, 2010 05:55 AM
AS PETER SPENCER ended his 52-day hunger strike, a family member last night drew a line under suggestions that the NSW grazier had climbed up his pole over a family debt.

The person said: ''Any suggestion that his debt to family members was behind the protest is completely inaccurate. We are all pleased at the news that Peter has come down, and we look forward to his full recovery.

''Peter's hunger strike was motivated by his concern at the effects of the Native Vegetation Act and other related issues.''

Mr Spencer burst into tears after being winched by a harness from his coup, 10 metres above the ground on his property at Shannons Flat, near Cooma. He said he had never expected the hunger strike to last so long.

Mr Spencer was urged by his doctors to end the hunger strike after concerns that his pulse rate, heart condition and low electrolytes could do permanent damage.

''The surgeon called me at 4pm yesterday [Tuesday] and I made the decision to come down then,'' Mr Spencer told the Sydney Morning Herald.

''But once I made that decision I had to really steel myself to stay up there another night before I could come down. It [the last night] was the hardest thing I have ever done.''

Mr Spencer was protesting over land clearing laws that prevent farmers removing trees from their properties without a permit. The laws were introduced, in part, to help Australia reduce carbon emissions and meet its Kyoto Protocol target.

Farmers have long demanded compensation for not being able to remove trees from their land, and Mr Spencer has called for a royal commission into the laws. He would continue his campaign for an investigation, he said.

He was too weak to walk yesterday and was taken by ambulance to Cooma hospital, where he was to stay overnight for observation. He said that he hoped his first meal would be salmon, but thought it would more likely be steak. He survived the 52 days consuming just water, lemon juice, vitamin tablets and painkillers.

The acting Environment Minister, Penny Wong, said the Federal Government welcomed the news that Mr Spencer had given up his protest and said the parliamentary secretary for water, Dr Mike Kelly, was willing to meet Mr Spencer to discuss his concerns. ''Mr Spencer has certainly made his point very clear,'' Senator Wong said.

The Opposition Leader, Tony Abbott, said the grazier had made ''an important point''.

''I think he's … highlighted the failures of the Labor Government, both here in NSW and federally, to deal with this issue.''

The Nationals Senator, Barnaby Joyce, who has publicly backed Mr Spencer's campaign, said he would continue to fight against ''these crazy environmental laws''.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Much like a marriage BOTH sides are to blame, but if any minister has the welfare of this nation and its poeple as a priority, by your actions in dealing [ ignoring ] the Peter Spencer issue you are all unworthy of the positions you hold. To the ministers such as Barnaby Joyce regardless of how he may benefit, did take the podium and speak loud and clear the TRUTH. If you live or work on Australian soil the message Peter Spencer made clear , I DO THIS FOR ALL AUSTRALIANS.
Posted by MACCA, 14/01/2010 10:29:12 AM
A different opinion of Peter's drafting of legislation in PNG, from http://larvatusprodeo.net/2010/01/11/peter-spencers-protest-50th-day/ That law and order policy document amounted to the recolonisation of PNG by Australia at the cost of billions of Australian dollars. It was never going to happen but Peter could not see this. When the Wingti government fell his chance fell with it. But he hung on, bailing himself up in the Office of the Prime Minister for weeks refusing to move; in much the same way as his hangs on to his property by sitting up a pole. It is tragic really. He should have learned from Lawrence of Arabia: “It is better that they do a thing imperfectly than for you to do it perfectly: for it is their country, their war, and your time is limited” He continued to pursue his policy option for PNG when he returned to Australia, further neglecting his farm. In fact was he ever a farmer? After 30 years in the Land of the Unexpected it must have been really boring for him to be just an Australian farmer. Better to start a tribal war between Australia’s left and right, between the land clearers and the greenies.
Posted by Mary, 14/01/2010 3:12:03 PM
I notice no comment from the Prime Minister's office !!!!!!!!!!
Posted by Sam, 15/01/2010 5:47:32 AM
What rot Mary, whatever was the initial prompt for Peter to do this does not matter. What matters is that he has finally managed to get mainline press to acknowledge the inequity that is occuring in rural Australia in regard to tree clearing legislation. Shame on Rudd and his mob for their blatant disregard of the whole situation, At least we now know how highly our vote and opinion is held by him and his rabble when he won't make the effort to even meet Peter. That is typical of the whole Labor Government, the rural voters don't exist for them.
Posted by Mrs Mac, 15/01/2010 6:20:44 AM
Your article has skirted around the issue of the theft of property rights .
Posted by wally, 15/01/2010 7:00:31 AM
Peter Spencer will be more effective alive than dead. It took too long before his voice was heard by Sydney media. We had enough of the city life and thought retiring to the country would be a more healthy place to live but didn't realise just how special country life has become to us and it is worth fighting for. Our children just shrug when we talk about the possibility of a third mine in Gloucester, their eyes glaze over which is said really; they don't have the maturity yet to understand, just as we didn't when we were in our early 30's, I guess. The country was a long way from the hustle and bustle of city life, we were raising kids and to be honest, didn't give it much thought, until we retired. We left the city to the young ones and perhaps when they are our age they will want to fight for what we are fighting for. A place where the air is unpolluted and the land is saved for agriculture; that is what we are striving to do for our grandchildren, so they can experience that life isn't all about making money but also about saving a lifestyle for the next generations to work and enjoy. Penny Wong came across very cold and uncaring when she spoke about Peter.
Posted by Lifestyle, 15/01/2010 9:07:43 AM
18 years ago when I lived in Canberra, I had a friend in a high position in a certain department and he told me then that he had been to meetings where the topic discussed was NIL FARMING IN AUSTRALIA. So do you expect these morons to care about anything that is happening in the country? I don't think so! People in the bush really need to get together and fight together for their future. And soon ... or there will be no future.
Posted by Jeff, 15/01/2010 9:56:16 AM
Senator Wong has obviously missed the point - the protest has not finished with the end of Peter's hunger strike. There are many others now wanting to continue to fight for justice.
Posted by towardswellness, 15/01/2010 10:30:03 AM
Thank God Peter is still alive to fight another day for the truth. Peter may not be perfect as Mary points out, but you must all admit he has guts and grit and those of us on the land know he has a cause to fight for. It is a cause common to city folk - it is the cause of freedom. Many people have lived and fought and died for this cause over many thousands of years. Please do not forget Peter's enduring feat and the reason for it. The fight against the green cancer that is destroying our land.
Posted by Common Cents, 15/01/2010 12:39:59 PM
Peter Spencer has been a brave catalyst towards seeing that our democracic institutions of government now urgently deal with the important issues he has highlighted. It is essential that the issues Peter has raised are given full and proper consideration by all levels of our governance. The NSW Farmers Association and the National Farmers Federation must remain pro-active and ever to the forefront to see that happens. Dinger.
Posted by Dinger, 15/01/2010 1:33:43 PM
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Fifty-two days - Peter Spencer on the ground with his daughter, Emma. Photo: Glen McCurtayne
Fifty-two days - Peter Spencer on the ground with his daughter, Emma. Photo: Glen McCurtayne
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
13 January, 2010
POLL
Q: Does the 'catastrophic' fire warning unnecessarily inflate bushfire danger?

Yes - it is over used and its meaning diluted
(61.8%)

No - it truthfully represents danger and should not be ignored
(28.3%)

I don't know what it really means
(9.9%)

Total Votes: 212
Poll Date: 13 January, 2010

Most popular articles

Advertisement



The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...