News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Exodus fears for Murray towns 

Exodus fears for Murray towns

18 Mar, 2009 07:23 AM
Northern Victorians are in danger of becoming Australia's first climate change refugees, according to a top Brumby Government water official.

Speaking at a water conference in Melbourne yesterday, Department of Sustainability and Environment executive director Campbell Fitzpatrick said the human aspect of climate change in the Murray-Darling Basin must not be forgotten amid the heated debate over water reform.

Victoria and South Australia have renewed hostilities over water, after South Australian Premier Mike Rann threatened to use the High Court to secure more water for the lower reaches of the Murray River.

Mr Rann, along with the Rudd Government, wants Victoria to remove the "4 per cent" limit on trading water out of irrigation districts.

Victoria wants to retain the limit to prevent the sudden removal of water - and therefore wealth - from northern Victorian towns, and Mr Fitzpatrick told the conference people living in those towns faced similar plights to the inhabitants of low-lying Pacific islands.

"I think a lot of these communities in northern Victoria are pretty close to Australia's first climate change refugees," he said.

"We think of climate change refugees as groups out in the Pacific Ocean on atolls about to be swamped by rising sea levels. Well, these are our own version of them."

Mr Fitzpatrick did not name towns, but the comments were a clear reference to communities such as Swan Hill and Mildura whose local economies are largely dependent on irrigation from the Murray River.

The Rudd Government wants the 4pc limit removed to ensure it does not pose a barrier to its plans to buy back $3 billion worth of water entitlements.

Mr Fitzpatrick said the limit was put in place long before such mammoth buyback plans were implemented.

"We didn't contemplate having billions on the market over four years," he said.

The limit is expected to rise to 6pc at the end of this year, and Mr Fitzpatrick indicated its removal might be more feasible once the Productivity Commission has finalised its advice to the Commonwealth on alternative water markets.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Implement the principles of Natural Sequence Farming to improve water and carbon retention in the soil and we're on the way to a sustainable future for the environment, agriculture, country towns and the source of our national identity.
Posted by mbh, 19/03/2009 8:24:35 AM
They'll be refugees only because the government has bought all the water to satisfy the green global-warming scaremongers.
Posted by Kevin Rude, 19/03/2009 12:49:20 PM
The alarmists will link their dodgy (climate change) religion with anything to keep the grant funding coming in.

When the Murray ceased to flow from Echuca, Vic, in 1945 and with the dry riverbed in 1914, the same population exodus would have occurred.

Posted by Len, 19/03/2009 1:21:05 PM
Why dont we all move to South Australia...on second thoughts, I just rembered I am a climate change sceptic, and therefore this drought will break and the Murray Valley once again will be the food bowl of Victoria/Australia.
Posted by MurrayCod, 19/03/2009 3:18:43 PM
Why is Victoria so special? The same thing will occur across all the other basin states if it doesn't rain soon, not just Vic.

Have they forgotten what a drought is down there? Welcome to Australia, 'land of droughts and flooding rains.'

Posted by Trev, 20/03/2009 9:42:00 AM
Trev, it's called 'dryness' now, not drought. Rudd and his band of socialist mates needs to look out of the windows of there city offices at the vandilism that has occurred there before ever pointing the finger at the farmers with their clean air. Farmers can feed 80 million people, a big lead on 300,000 that was here before white settlement. Kevin Dudd
Posted by Kevin Dudd, 20/03/2009 5:20:03 PM
"Dryness is when it doesn't rain for a few days in the city - this isn't dryness, it's a dust bowl that doesn't get any moisture."
Posted by Chrissy, 22/03/2009 11:27:02 PM
Australia has always prided itself on its fair and equitable society, giving everyone a fair go! It is a shame this attitude doesn't apply when it comes to water distribution, "oh no sir'eee!", it's every man and state for himself. Or should that be every city for itself in Melbourne's case! It is a huge insult to northern victorian communities - Melbourne is not the only place that is experiencing lower rainfall and even with the drought what Melbourne gets in rainfall compared to the northwestern communities in Victoria is like chalk and cheese. Why isn't Melbourne doing more to secure its city requirements other than a desal plant and the N/S pipeline? What gives a government the right to take water from areas that are more drought stricken than the place they are taking the water too? Where is the equity here? "Oh I forgot, that's right, there isn't any!" We all use water, no matter where we live. No state/city should have right of water over any other state or city, especially when such an integral commodity gives economic life to such a major section of Australia's population. The Murray Darling Basin delivers flows all the way from the north of this country to the south. The river knows no such boundaries such as borders/cities/country communities. Governments delineate these differences and should be fair in how they distribute "liquid gold". It stinks and the losers are the country communities and the environment.
Posted by LJL, 23/03/2009 3:19:46 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
16 March, 2009
17 March, 2009
18 March, 2009
17 March, 2009
POLL
Q: If a federal election were held on Saturday, which party would you vote for?

Labor
(16.8%)

Liberal
(40.5%)

Nationals
(25%)

Greens
(8.6%)

Family First
(1.3%)

Independent
(5.9%)

Other
(1.8%)

Total Votes: 1043
Poll Date: 15 March, 2009

Most popular articles

SPRAY AWARDS NEWS MREC



The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...