News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 ETS won't cause major food price rise: Climate Institute 

ETS won't cause major food price rise: Climate Institute

02 Feb, 2010 03:00 AM
The impact of extreme weather events on food prices dwarf the modest increases expected under the proposed emissions trading scheme, according to The Climate Institute.

It says droughts and other extreme weather events, which could potentiallyi increase under climate change, have recently increased grocery shopfront prices for lamb by almost 60 per cent and tripled the price of bananas.

But it says UK and Australian analysis of emissions trading schemes found average grocery prices would face significantly smaller rises.

"Hysterical claims by some politicians and business lobbyists of food prices sky-rocketing because of action on climate change that limits and prices carbon pollution are just not supported by publically available, credible evidence," Climate Institute CEO John Connor said.

"Making big polluters pay through an emissions trading scheme, as part of a global effort, is the best way to manage the risks of climate change and the threat it poses to food prices and farming productivity.

"What all the credible research shows is that farmers, consumers and producers will be hit hardest in the hip pocket by the impacts of climate change – not by policies that limit and price the carbon pollution through an emissions trading scheme.

"An emissions trading scheme is part of the solution – not part of the problem."

To support its claim, the Climate Institute says that in the last quarter of 2009 fruit prices rose 16 per cent because of poor growing conditions.

"Those conditions will get tougher and ultimately near impossible in our Murray Darling foodbowl if global warming gets over 2 degrees above pre-industrial levels, and especially if it approaches 4 degrees," Mr Connor said.

The group also cites the Garnaut Report as warning that unmitigated climate change would all but wipe out farming in the Murray Darling Basin by the end of the century.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
So, gather round all you deniers and sceptics from the agriculture industry, I will say this only once: you have more to lose from not supporting an ETS than you do from supporting an ETS. Why don't you all sit down on the back verandah, and have a good think about it. Thinking is not all that hard, you know, and it gets easier ther more you do it. Go on, have a try.
Posted by Bushie Bill, 2/02/2010 11:21:34 AM
The Climate Institute are up to their old tricks again. Think up a title that sounds official and send out press releases, it's that easy. These people are con artists intent on making you pay more for everything, including 4 times more for electricity so that they can profit from the useless renewable technology they call wind power.
Posted by mick, 2/02/2010 12:31:15 PM
Don't we love all this crap. Where are the statements about the failure of Jokenhagen? So Bushie Bill the Rudd TAX is going to solve all the perceived problems with wealth redistribution to buy votes.
Posted by jerangle, 3/02/2010 12:59:22 PM
With Copenhagen nothing but a pointless pilgrimage the ETS serves no purpose and is seen by the public as a political dead body, why would you want to pursue it? It does nothing for anyone, except tax average mums and dads of course, for nothing!!!
Posted by What the, 3/02/2010 7:05:53 PM
From objective analysis, it seems an ETS will be more successful than "the magic pudding at the end of the rainbow" approach from the Abbott camp. Are you all so stupid as to believe the "trust me I am an ex-seminarian and won't lie to you and I won't let you down we are honourable Liberals who always honour our promises, especially to our coalition partner " approach from a senior member of the government that bought you to the status you have been whingeing about and been running around Canberra like headless chooks? How quickly you forget. Question: how many positions can you remember Abbott adopting on climate change over the last twelve months? Second question: how much empathy has Abbott exhibited for Nationals causes over his time in parliament? A special prize selected by Bonehead Barney for the most correct answer.
Posted by Bushie Bill, 4/02/2010 9:10:44 AM
Hey Bushie, Labor, Bill. Where are the details of the Rudd TAX? When questioned it is basically the same, trust us, we will compensate you, so you will vote for us again and you will have money for the beer, smokes, poker machines at your club. You can't get an answer out of any of the goons, Garrett, Combet and Wong.
Posted by jerangle, 4/02/2010 3:12:34 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
29 January, 2010
31 January, 2010
POLL
Q: What level of trust do you have in the claims made by environmental campaigners?

Total
(5%)

High
(12.7%)

Moderate
(6.2%)

Low
(21.3%)

None
(54.8%)

Total Votes: 1310
Poll Date: 31 January, 2010

Most popular articles

Advertisement



The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...