News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 ETS amendments after Copenhagen no worries for Nats 

ETS amendments after Copenhagen no worries for Nats

08 Oct, 2009 04:14 PM
OPPOSITION spokesman for agriculture, John Cobb, says he won't have a problem with amendments to the Government's Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme if they ensure Australia won't have a harsher scheme than America's, and it is not voted on before Copenhagen.

Turmoil is raging in Opposition ranks over what position the Coalition will take on emissions trading, and how much support Liberal leader, Malcolm Turnbull, can muster for action on climate change.

More and more backbenchers, as well as some frontbenchers, have come out at odds with Mr Turnbull despite his "back me or sack me" calls arguing that he would be unable to lead a party that did not support action on climate change.

Mr Cobb said agriculture would be the most affected industry regardless of whether they are actually incorporated in the scheme or not, and Mr Turnbull was acutely aware of this, he added.

He said many in the joint party understood the global mood for action on climate change, but did not want that action to come at any cost to Australian industries competing on the world stage.

"We should all be arguing for nothing stronger than what the Americans are doing – and why in heaven's name would we want to go out with one without knowing what the rest of the world is doing," Mr Cobb said.

"We can't avoid the fact that the world wants to deal with climate change and obviously Australia should play its part but it is nonsensical to penalise one of Australia's dominant export industries like agriculture, which is the industry responsible for us not sliding into recession. Why make us less competitive?"

Mr Cobb said he was not arguing that the Rudd Government or Opposition ignore climate change.

"But everybody involved in agriculture needs to remember that the big point is not whether we're in or not and I'll add it would be impossible to be in – but we are going to be the most affected industry by a Rudd scheme," Mr Cobb said.

"Australia cannot go down a Rudd scheme because it penalises us.

"If Turnbull can get Rudd to negotiate to a point where we're not going to have a scheme that's any worse than America's or that doesn't come out before Copenhagen, I won't have a real problem, and I don't think anyone does – National, Liberal or otherwise."

Minister for Climate Change, Penny Wong, said the Government is prepared to have a discussion with Mr Turnbull when he presents amendments supported by his party room.

"It’s time for members of the Liberal Party to stop playing these tricky political games on an issue as important as climate change," Senator Wong said.

The Opposition will return to Canberra a day early for a special joint-party meeting on the legislation and amendments on October 18 before meeting with the Government that week when parliament resumes from its month-long spring break.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1


comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Mr Turnbull is right - the only chance the Coalition has of getting elected is to offer what the community wants (or has been told it wants). As Peter Garrett said during the last Federal election campaign - It doesn't matter - it will all change once ... elected. The dissident Coalition members need to get a dose of political acumen and get on with getting elected instead of being so holier than thou.
Posted by AJ, 9/10/2009 7:44:36 AM
The voter has not been told that there is a bipartisan agreement on this and Turnbull needs to demonstrate that they do not stand for what KRudd is putting forward. Turnbull is no politician and his arrogance is showing by demanding he be followed, he needs to listen and show he stands for something different from what Labor is and not a clone, then as a last resort temper the legislation by amending it. His approach is we stood for this and let's amend it, therefore it give the appearance of bipartisan support. The sooner people believe that the liberals do not believe that carbon is a pollutant then the support will return.
Posted by Alan Mears, 9/10/2009 8:58:35 AM
I have tried and tried to understand all this ETS stuff but I cannot get an agreement with myself one way or another. The more I read the more confused. I think by waiting to see what the rest of the world is doing makes sense. One thing that I have learnt in business is that being a pioneer requires a big ticker and plenty of cash reserves. The government appears to have the ticker but any reserves they have come out of our collective pockets. Maybe hasten slowly for just a few months.
Posted by Just wondering, 9/10/2009 8:59:13 AM
All the politicians should know that Global Warming is a fraud. There is overwhelming evidence that it is a fraud. Why do they persist with the scam?
Posted by Len, 9/10/2009 10:47:43 AM
They persist with the scam because it means BIG MONEY, out of your pocket and into there's.
Posted by hey loc, 10/10/2009 7:02:39 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Nationals agriculture spokesman John Cobb.
Nationals agriculture spokesman John Cobb.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
07 October, 2009
08 October, 2009
POLL
Q: Should the Liberal Party follow Malcolm Turnbull's lead and push for amendments to Labor's emissions trading scheme (ETS)?

Yes - an amended ETS is needed
(39.7%)

No - they should flatly oppose the ETS
(51.9%)

Other
(8.5%)

Total Votes: 567
Poll Date: 04 October, 2009

Most popular articles

Advertisement



The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...