News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 COP 15: Global agriculture's big day out 

COP 15: Global agriculture's big day out

10 Dec, 2009 11:29 AM
THE world's farmers will be united this weekend when the global farm community meets in Copenhagen to fight for a climate change deal that will protect agriculture, not destroy it.

On Saturday, farmers will take centre stage in Copenhagen for Agriculture and Rural Development Day, which will highlight the importance of agriculture in beating climate change and feeding the world.

Farm leaders from more than 200 countries will be there, as will scientists and farm policy makers to develop a work plan with strategies and actions to fully incorporate agriculture into the post-Copenhagen agenda.

An international lobby of farmers has been pushing for agriculture to be recognised in a stand-alone agreement when a new climate deal is reached.

Many believe this could be the only outcome achieved in Copenhagen at the end of the week.

This lobby now has the support of the World Bank, which recognises the good work farmers are doing to adapt to climate change and mitigate its effects.

They now want UN secretary general Ban Ki Moon to come out in support of including agriculture as part of the climate change negotiations.

"Farmers will not accept a one-sided outcome in which emissions are penalised, but contributions to sequestration are ignored," International Federation of Agricultural Producers' (IFAP) president, Ajay Veshee said.

"The adaptation of the agricultural sector is crucial for future food and energy security, but this is a responsibility that must be shared by society."

One of the key themes at Agriculture Day will be outlining the triple challenge to agriculture of increasing food productivity, climate resilience and greenhouse gas mitigation.

An "ideas marketplace", showcasing specific examples of ways farmers are adapting to climate change, will also be a feature.

The National Farmers Federation has sent a delegation to attend Agriculture Day, headed up by president David Crombie, and has been working closely with IFAP during this week's intense negotiations.

* Lucy Knight will be attending Agriculture Day in Copenhagen this weekend, with reports on the ongoing negotiations to be published on FarmOnline and in the Rural Press weekly newspapers.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Hallelujah! Finally some sense out of this climate change crap. If you want to know more about how our agriculture and livestock help the climate please go to drovers site: http://www.drovers.com/news_editorial.asp?pgID=675&ed_id=6559&ts=nl2 and also link to the full EPA report if you like. Finally some truth and sense is coming out of the dubious science associated with the proposed ETS. Please note when agricultural emissions are calculated they include from oil well to table but when transport emissions are calculated they only account for the fuel used in transport and none of the manufacture of the trucks or any other on costs.
Posted by Common Cents, 11/12/2009 8:08:48 AM
This is a complete waste of time until the carbon emitted to produce food is attached to the food when it is exported. We export 75% of our beef and 85% of our grain but under current IPCC rules we are stuck with all the CO2 emissions. This is the greatest fraud in the IPCC accounting framework. A major part of our recorded emissions are for products, like food, woodchips and aluminium, that are exported, and mostly to less developed nations that appear to have very low per capita emissions. When proper "user pays" principles are applied to carbon accounting, Australia's per capita emissions decline significantly and those of many less developed nations increase. And make no mistake, gonzo accounting for carbon WILL cost jobs, trash marriages and break businesses.
Posted by Ian Mott, 11/12/2009 9:29:03 AM
Cop-out 15 is all about money and very little to do with the environment.
Posted by Len, 11/12/2009 12:52:43 PM
Yes, the user pays principle is the best approach and doesnt need agreement from other countries. As with GST, exports should have the carbon tax rebated and imports are charged the carbon tax. Simple and fair. The consumer of the goods who is the one actually responsible for the emissions pays the tax.
Posted by terry, 11/12/2009 2:29:21 PM
The end user hardly pays for the farm-made section of the produce in finished goods and demands things such as mulesed sheep, but the test comes when it is sitting on a supermarket shelf. Tax the finished product I say.
Posted by john, 11/12/2009 2:58:39 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Farmers will not accept a one-sided outcome in which emissions are penalised, but contributions to sequestration are ignored, says International Federation of Agricultural Producers' president, Ajay Veshee.
"Farmers will not accept a one-sided outcome in which emissions are penalised, but contributions to sequestration are ignored," says International Federation of Agricultural Producers' president, Ajay Veshee.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
09 December, 2009
10 December, 2009
POLL
Q: Which do you think is the best method for reducing Australia's carbon emissions?

Emissions Trading Scheme
(8.7%)

Carbon Tax
(11.7%)

Laws regulating behaviour
(7.7%)

Direct Govt investment in renewable energy
(42.9%)

Direct Govt payments for emissions reductions
(5.2%)

None of the above
(23.8%)

Total Votes: 762
Poll Date: 06 December, 2009

Most popular articles




The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...